Lee Strunk's War In 'Friends, By Tim O' Brien
I agree that the conflict between Lee Strunk and Dave Jensen alludes to future conflict between soldiers; however, I believe this conflict also reveals the degraded mindframe that these soldiers endured during the war. Like you pointed out, Jensen becomes wildly unstable after the fight. O’Brien even claims that, “The distinction between good guys and bad guys disappeared for him” (63). Jensen believed he couldn’t even trust his own ally. He would have restless nights and would break down, all because he believed Strunk would kill him over a measly broken nose.
In The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, ambiguity is used to enforce the character of the story. O’Brien communicates the struggle of being on the battlefield, however it wasn’t a choice but a matter of abstract selection in which he couldn’t deny. O’Brien uses series of fear, the savage of the war on the soldiers and how the over certain fear. Repetition of the emphasize the ambiguity of dead. O’Brien fears going to war, he was about to risk his life.
This is important because it outlines how he deals with emotional distraught on his own and how he wants to keep to himself relating with internal problems. An example form The Things They Carried is in the quote, “...I headed straight west along the Rainy River...” (P. 45). This quote refers to when O’Brien received his draft notice for the military during the Vietnam War. He became very upset and responds to it by driving on his own towards Canada in hopes of avoiding the draft and isolating himself from his family and friends.
In the short story, “The Man I Killed,” O’Brien focuses on this to show that everyone fighting in a war has a story. He spends the story describing the man he killed and searching for justification of his actions. He carries around guilt with him because of it, and his fellow soldiers try to help him justify and come to terms with his action by saying things like, “You want to trade places with him? Turn it all upside down= you want that? I mean, be honest,” (126) and “Tim, it’s a war.
The men who served in the Vietnam War were just barely men, some of them were just hitting the age twenty. It was the draft which brought these boys into the fight involuntarily, to fight a war which they saw no meaning in. Many of these boys are the sons of veterans who fought in World War II, that came home to parades and were held up like heroes for fighting. Honorary men of the country and the soldiers fighting for Vietnam did not want to disappoint them. Thus, when O’Brien mentions in the quote, valor was not the point, he is trying to explain to the reader that the men went like it was a job they had to do, not a random act of courage that willed them to proceed.
Challenges at War Robert E. Lee once said, “What a cruel thing war is… to fill our hearts with hatred instead of love for our neighbors”. The novel The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien takes place in Vietnam. He and a handful of other men experience things only one can image and hope they will never have to experience again. They learn how death among them can greatly affect them, and many others. War is not an easy task to get through and these men all had different coping methods.
Regret is a powerful emotion that has the ability to scar someone for the rest of their life. Moments of regret can come from relationships, self-made decisions and life changing events. The idea of regret also applies to “A Marker on the Side of the Boat” by Bao Ninh and “On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien. Although these two literary pieces are very different in many ways, both authors describe the experience of the Vietnam War as a time of regretful decisions that negatively impacted people of both the American side and the Vietnamese side. Both authors tell a story about a character that recalls of flashbacks of the war, where they grieve over the past decisions that have affected them for the rest of their life.
It was explained within the fourth chapter, “On the Rainy River,” in which O’Brien was forced to participate in a war he did not want any part in. Within this chapter, he explains that when he was faced with the eminent doom of war, he ran away.
This quote epitomizes the trauma caused by war. O’Brien is trying to cope, mostly through writing these war stories but has yet to put it behind him. He feels guilt, grief, and responsibility, even making up possible scenarios about the life of the man he killed and the type of person he was. This
O’Brien had no will to kill anyone, nor did he have hatred towards the said enemy. He only followed the orders of the commanders. O’Brien hated the fact that he had to kill innocent people, he also hated the idea that after being on combat for the first time he had become a part of the idea he hated so much. It is a known fact that trauma changes people. When the soldiers run into an injured Vietnamese soldier who happened to be a woman, O’Brien shows different characteristic that was shared among soldiers.
In The Things They Carried, O’Brien’s story-telling method is an attempt to show that the lines between fiction and reality are often not that far. Even though the names or details may not be fully accurate, this does not change the fact that they are a reality for many. Additionally, he challenges the importance that we place on war and links it to a storytelling aspect because he’s pointing out that not every story has a moral to it. With tragic events, we typically want some sort of meaning behind them, some sort of assurance that the incident was not for nothing. However, this is not always true, as a character “Yeah, well…I don’t see no moral”…
(CE) Before O'Brien heard about the war, he realized the war was something he did not want to participate in. (DE) He says to himself that [he] would not swim away from [his] hometown and [his] country and [his] life. [He] would not be brave” (O’Brien 55).
(p. 126). Though he does not see him as the enemy, O’Brien reacts as he had been taught to in war; to forget most of your morals and shoot before you can be shot first, a fact Kiowa points out to him. “Later, I remember, Kiowa tried to tell me that the man would 've died anyway. He told me that it was a good kill, that I was a soldier and this was a war, that I should shape up and stop staring and ask myself what the dead man would ' ve done if things were reversed” (p. 127). Soldiers are expected to forget their morals and act as a soldier should.
War was so much more than just war to O’Brien and he able to share this through his writing. " But this is true: stories can save us. ... in a story, which is a kind of dreaming, the dead sometimes smile and sit up and return to the world." (page
This is evident when Mr. O’Brien says, “I would go to the war – I would kill and maybe die – because I was embarrassed not to,” (pg. 57.) In the end the author realized what he must do and went back home, so he could fight in the Vietnam
More about Lee Strunk's War In 'Friends, By Tim O' Brien
The Conflict Between Lee Strunk And Dave Jensen's War
206 Words | 1 PagesAmbiguity In The Things They Carried By Tim O Brien
249 Words | 1 PagesSimilarities Between Catcher In The Rye And The Things They Carried
1272 Words | 6 PagesThings They Carried By Tim O Brien: A Literary Analysis
1292 Words | 6 PagesCourage In Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried
730 Words | 3 PagesWhy The Challenges At War In Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried
757 Words | 4 PagesA Marker On The Side Of The Boat Analysis
813 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Shame In The Things They Carried
944 Words | 4 PagesPTSD In Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried
1504 Words | 7 PagesIf I Die In A Combat Zone Box Me Home Analysis
894 Words | 4 PagesFiction And Reality In Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried
1413 Words | 6 PagesShame In The Things They Carried
928 Words | 4 PagesMoral Confusion In The Things They Carried
645 Words | 3 PagesThe Things They Carried: An Analysis
688 Words | 3 PagesThe Things They Carried Internal Conflict Analysis
845 Words | 4 Pages