In today’s world, with all the technology that is readily available, finding information that is creditable can pose as a challenge. With social media and everything being online, it seems as if anyone from everywhere can post whatever they think, whether it is deemed to be accurate or not. Using the topic of national debt of the United States as a guide, I was able to analyze plausible sources and compare them to inaccurate sources. Journalist, Brandon Greife, in his article, “Liberals are Losing the National Debt Argument,” elaborates on the topic of what liberals are having to say about National debt. Greif’s purpose is to tell readers about what liberals are doing and why it is the wrong way. Greife expresses a biased tone to convey his …show more content…
He captivates the audience by drawing out how much the nation is in debt and using logic and reasoning to do so. Robbins narrates that America is currently in debt by $15 trillion dollars but then goes on to ask the question, “what’s the difference between millions, billions and trillions?” (Robbins). No one knows just how significant the differences between the numbers are, people see these numbers all the time but have not fully grasped how truly different these ginormous numbers are. He makes these numbers more comprehensible in our minds by relating them to seconds. He goes on by asking the question of just how long ago was one million seconds ago, and the answer is “one million seconds, was 12 days ago from now” (Robbins). Continuing …show more content…
However, this is challenged by the Salt Lake Tribune’s article, “Blame Republicans for huge national debt,” which is a response letter to someone who wrote to the paper, expressing their opinion on how democrats are to blame for the national debt. The article points out the fallacy in the argument made by Greife by contrary evidence that, “When President Bush took office, the national debt was $5.6 trillion and there was a balanced budget. When Bush left office, it was almost $12 trillion, and the debt has now grown to about $19 trillion” (Olsen). Olsen then goes on pointing out that the Republicans were indeed the ones who supported the tax cut that Bush created and that have to own up to the fact that they created the huge national debt. Greife’s article employs selective evidence, leaving out how then conservatives are winning the national debt argument which gives the reader a skewed and incomplete view of the issue. Furthermore, with further research, Greife’s article turned up to be a blog. Finding your information from a blog is not an authentic source to use because anyone from everywhere can write any opinions they want on