ipl-logo

Liberian Women In The Civil War Essay

1157 Words5 Pages

Evaluation of Sources SOURCE A Origin Bekoe, D. & Parajon C., 2007. Women’s Role in Liberia’s Reconstruction, USIP Publications. Online: USIP Publications Available: http://www.usip.org/publications/women-s-role-in-liberia-s-reconstruction This is an article that directly discusses the steps that the women of Liberia took in order to achieve peace and begin rebuilding their country once again by forming united and joined organizations and this article was published on the 1st of May 2007 and this is a secondary source. Usefulness The usefulness of this source is that it clearly reveals and explains what exactly the Liberian women did in order to stop a civil war, and what steps they took to cause such a revolutionary movement. Purpose The …show more content…

Karim, S. Bernstein, E. 2013. Liberia. Online: Women under Siege Project Available: http://www.womenundersiegeproject.org/conflicts/profile/liberia This article discusses the Ethical Background of Liberia and the road to the civil war, and this is a secondary resource. Usefulness The usefulness of this source is that it clearly explains the background of Liberia and how it started and the source also goes into depth about the different ethnic groups in Liberia and why and how they were formed. Purpose The purpose of this source is to make one understand what exactly led to the Liberian Civil War and the source goes into depth about explaining why sexualised violence is used as a war tool because Liberian women went through hell because of sexualised violence. Validity This source is valid, in connection with the fact that it clearly highlights the background of Liberia but it does not really go into detail about where the women came into the equation and it the source went around in circles before getting to the point. Limitations Instead of the source discussing the role that Liberian women played in ending the war, the source focused too much on the history and back story of Liberia and the authors added too much unnecessary information into the source which made it too

Open Document