Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Today's juvenile justice system
Pros of juveniles being tried
Today's juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Today's juvenile justice system
Pros of juveniles being tried
Today's juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Today's juvenile justice system
Facts: The Petitioner Evan Miller along with his co-defendant, Colby Smith, brutally beat and robbed their neighbor, Cole Cannon, as well as set his trailer ablaze the night of July 15th, 2003. Throughout that night, Miller and Smith were in and out of Cannon ’s trailer. They were there the first time looking for drugs but when they couldn’t find any they took Cannon’s baseball cards instead. Late that evening they returned where Cannon fell unconscious due to the consumption of drugs and alcohol.
Sending a juvenile to adult prisons won’t necessarily help solve their wrongdoings but they may be influenced by older offenders and never be able to change for the better. Richard may have never been able to get out of jail if he had been strongly influenced by older offenders even with the possibility of parole. The courts have a bias against Richard that can not be shifted even with Sasha’s family's endorsement. They control how Richard’s life will turn out while trying to solve a mistake they had the possibility of making another
Some pro's would be that it would definitely divert youthful offenders from committing future crimes, as well as committing a crime at all, as it would show the child that it can land them in serious trouble, far more trouble if they were treated differently than adults. Juveniles would also have great constitutional protection as an adult compared to being a minor. Being in an adult court, Juveniles would have the right to a jury trial, since most states don't allow jury trials in juvenile courts. Juries could also be more sympathetic to a minor, depending on the
People argue that some juveniles are “too young and they don’t understand” but either way, they still broke the law and should be fairly punished. A fact stating “There are approximately 6,000 juveniles in adult jails and prisons in the United States” shows that people who have broken the law with felonies have been confined by law, no matter the age. People need to learn before they act in a similar manner, again. A similar case is a boy named Craig Price from Rhode Island who had committed multiple felonies, such as four murders and was charged as a minor, meaning he was arrested around age 16 and would get out and have his criminal record sealed at age 21. Because of this, a law was changed so that juveniles could be tried as adults with serious crimes.
This is a much less adversarial system. This allows the court to remain relatively informal, with the aim of not isolating the juvenile form the legal proceedings, and allows them more involvement, making the accountable for their actions. In the case of Police v JM (2011) NSWChC 1, the key objective of the sentencing was rehabilitation. JM had breached the conditions of his parole when he was charged with aggravated break and enter resulting in the imposing of the most serious sentence available for juvenile offenders, a control order. To promote rehabilitation, a condition of his parole was rehabilitation for his alcohol abuse.
The purpose of the juvenile system is to focus on the reasons for their behavior rather than focusing on the being guilty or innocent, like how the adult court system works. Having community based restorative justice is one of the main targets the system should focus on with juveniles. Community based restorative justice focuses on the harm that was caused and what needs to happen in order to be better. I also believe that getting juveniles involved in community service will only do good for the kids as well. Another statement mentioned in the article “Juvenile InJustice: Charging Youth as Adults Is Ineffective, Biased, and Harmful” they write, “When we lock up young people, they are more likely to be exposed to extreme violence, fall prey to abuse, and suffer from illness.
It was also found that the harsher the penalty on a young person the greater the likelihood they would reoffend. The report suggested that a 17yr old child was still of an age that a lifetime of criminal activity could be avoided if there were not exposed to adult prisons and
He explains how these kids are “left without help or hope.” This means that juveniles who get sentenced to life in prison do not have the opportunity to educate themselves, rehabilitate, or enjoy life again. They are simply existing inside four walls that separate them from the real world. This is not a proper punishment for juveniles. They do not learn or change when they are sentenced to life without parole.
There are certain instances of juveniles being tried as adults and sometimes ending up getting a life sentence without a chance of parole. I find that pretty harsh because there have been some cases where the juvenile meant no harm, they were either confused or brought along by gang members and they end up being charged along with the gang members for just being with them when a crime goes down. I believe that juveniles do not deserve to be given a life sentence because for one they are still maturing, they can learn from their mistakes and make amends, we still have to combat crimes like intended murder committed by a juvenile with extreme punishments especially if they are well over the age of 16. In the article published by the New York Times on March 14, 2012 “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger discusses that juveniles deserve a second chance since their brains are still developing.
The ones in the juvenile system often reoffend and end up back in the same place. If the juveniles aren’t tried in adult court for serious crimes their punishment won’t be as long and they will commit the crime again and again. The crimes that the children commit would probably go down if they are tried in the adult court. Some of the children that were transferred to criminal court were more likely to be convicted and receive periods of incarceration. If juveniles aren’t tried in adult court they get off of the crime they committed easier.
We have seen today in society of how crime rates have been rampant and how statistics show that most of the crimes were being made by minors. I believe that when most of them look at the bottom of these young offenders come disproportionately from impoverished single-parent homes that are located in the neighbourhoods desinvertido and have high rates of learning disabilities, mental health, and substance abuse and problems with the help of the system of juvenile justice that can make a great return on a successful transition to adulthood. Their ages ranged from 20 and under, most are under fifteen years of age. Juveniles tried as adults must assume the same consequences as any other criminal and are subject to state prisons with inmates much higher and that have probably committed crimes much more tortuous then you could ever have. These minors between the ages of nine to twenty according to the offence committed or of the number of times that are prosecuted and believe that it is immutable.
Why should teen felons get to spend their jail time in juvenile detention centers for committing the same crimes as adults? In today’s world, teens are increasingly committing violent crimes and being put in juvenile detention centers. Teens need to be tried as adults because it helps to bring justice to families of victims, and it also teaches the teens accountability. Charging teens as adults will also help reduce crime in the United States. Although many people feel that teens should not be given severe punishments because they are immature and innocent, they have not considered the problem teens are creating by committing these crimes..
The criminal justice system was created in order to punish people who choose to break the law. Some people believe they are above the law and decided to do whatever they like regardless of the consequences. Children and adults are both responsible for the actions they commit. The criminal justice should tried children as adults for committing felonies because a crime is a crime regardless of the age of the individual. This can be fulfilled by punishing juvelives with the correct sentence, by seeing that they know their actions lead to consequence and they have the proper process for a teen to be tried as adult.
Those in favor of trying juveniles as adults believe that it deters and minimizes crimes being committing by all minors. That trying juveniles as adults will bring the greatest good to the most amount of people. According to an article posted by the American Bar Association by Nicole Scialabba, “the increase in laws that allow more juveniles to be prosecuted in adult court rather than juvenile court was intended to serve as a deterrent for rising youth violent crime.” It is no secret that youth commit crimes in our society. In 2014, law enforcement agencies in the U.S. made an estimated 1 million arrests of persons under age 18 (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention).
The consequences may affect the minors negatively. Minors have a higher chance of rehabilitation if they are tried through juvenile court so that they can become better members of civilization. Despite that, some people think that minors may not learn their lesson if they are put through juvenile court, but minors should not be treated the same as adults. Minors should be treated for their age, not their crime so that they have the opportunity to change and become a better member of