Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Juveniles rehabilitation
Juvenile justice system in simple word
Juvenile justice system in simple word
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Juveniles rehabilitation
Juvenile justice system in simple word
Juvenile justice system in simple word
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On November 18, 1999, Kuntrell Jackson accompanied his older cousin, Travis Booker, and an older friend, Derrick Shields, to a video store after discussing robbing the store (Chang & Wang, 2012). Jackson waited outside of the store while Shields entered, pointed a shotgun at the clerk, and demanded money; Jackson entered shortly after, and while he was in the store Shields shot and killed the store clerk because she would not give him money and mentioned calling the police (Chang & Wang, 2012). After Shields shot the clerk, he left the store with Jackson and Booker; they did not steal anything from the store while they were inside, even after the clerk had been shot and killed (Chang & Wang, 2012). Nearly four years later, on July 19, 2003,
For the past years there has been a debate on whether juveniles should be tried as life without parole or life with parole. In my opinion juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence to life without parole. Although the juveniles are underage they are well informed of what’s right and what’s wrong, but some of them have difficulty understanding of what they are doing at the moment of the crime because they are angry and act before thinking clearly. I agree with the majority of supreme court justices who believe that mandatory life sentences are unconstitutional, unfair and inhumane because juveniles are immature, their brain is not completely developed, and they are unaware of long term impact
The juvenile criminals are not fit to be a part of society the moment they decide to kill or severely hurt someone. They have no regard for human life and therefore, they should be locked up or given the death penalty depending on the severity of their
Juveniles should be tried as adults with life without parole but only in certain cases: depending on their motive or modus operandi, their crime, and criminal background. Motivation Scandalous kids who commit crimes for unreasonable motives should most definitely have life without the possibility of parole. In some cases, they’re just doing what they think is best. Jacob Ind, a 15 year old from Colorado, was beaten and sexually molested by his step father. His mother abused him as well.
There are certain instances of juveniles being tried as adults and sometimes ending up getting a life sentence without a chance of parole. I find that pretty harsh because there have been some cases where the juvenile meant no harm, they were either confused or brought along by gang members and they end up being charged along with the gang members for just being with them when a crime goes down. I believe that juveniles do not deserve to be given a life sentence because for one they are still maturing, they can learn from their mistakes and make amends, we still have to combat crimes like intended murder committed by a juvenile with extreme punishments especially if they are well over the age of 16. In the article published by the New York Times on March 14, 2012 “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger discusses that juveniles deserve a second chance since their brains are still developing.
In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that it is immoral to give juveniles life sentences, even if they commit a crime as serious as murder, because it is a cruel and unusual punishment. This has been an issue in America as teenagers are often treated as adults in court due to a belief that their crimes warrant a harsh punishment. Many believe that these kids should not be given such major sentences because they are still immature and do not have the self control that adults do. I agree that juveniles do not deserve life sentences because they put less thought and planning into these crimes and they often are less malicious than adults. The article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that the teenagers lose brain tissue that is responsible for self control and impulses (Thompson 7).
When people commit crimes, there should be disciplined no matter what. Juveniles need to learn that their behaviors have consequences. Why should kids be given any less of a punishment for committing the same crime? According to one author, “Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate. After all, the victim’s life will never be returned, and the family will permanently lose their loved one” (“7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults”).
Juvenile Justice is a type of justice that is either given or not given to teenagers, ages 18 and under who had committed any form of a bad crime, like rape, murder, theft, or robbery. These are types of crimes that some adults do that is beyond unbelievable. Juveniles should be treated as adults in courts because even though some juveniles/teenagers are not matured yet, as some would say, those juveniles should know what the right and wrong in certain actions we do in everyday life. However, if the court pleads the prosecutor guilty, he/she must only be sent to juvenile detention center until he/she turns the adulthood age, then he/she can be sent into prison facility, but the sentence should be less harsh as the person who had committed the
What does the age of a criminal have to do with the heinous crime they have committed? While it is understandable to treat a child who has not yet fully grasped the sense of what is ethically right or wrong with a less severe punishment than someone who is matured to a point of being aware of their actions. Teens and even those who are mature enough to see that the crimes they are doing are wrong, but regardless still go through with such an act should not be shown mercy for a crimes that are as serious as intentionally hurting someone or even in the most serious cases murder. The age of a criminal should not be the main or only factor when deciding to let someone who is under the age of 18 off easy on their actions. It should almost always
In our society, crimes are being committed not only by adults but by juveniles as well. By law as soon as a person turns 18 they are considered to be an adult. So what if an adult and a juvenile were to commit the same crime yet were sentenced differently simply based on the fact that one is a child and one is an adult? Juveniles are committing violent crimes just as adults and should be given the equal treatment and sentencing as adults receive. Juveniles aren’t completely ignorant as everyone seems to think.
If the situation calls for it, juveniles should be able to sentenced life in prison and if decided so shall be left no sympathy because they are kids. Although we all make mistakes.
Juveniles Justice Juveniles who are criminals being sentenced to life without parole can be shocking to some people. I believe if a juvenile is able to commit a crime, then they are able to do the time. The article “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” talks about how the brain can be different from the time you are teens to the time you are an adult. After, considering both sides on juvenile justice it is clear that juveniles should face life without parole because they did the crime so they can do the time. Also I believe the juvenile’s age should not influence the sentence and the punishment give.
Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.
The consequences may affect the minors negatively. Minors have a higher chance of rehabilitation if they are tried through juvenile court so that they can become better members of civilization. Despite that, some people think that minors may not learn their lesson if they are put through juvenile court, but minors should not be treated the same as adults. Minors should be treated for their age, not their crime so that they have the opportunity to change and become a better member of
60% of juveniles get convicted are tried as adults with life in prison without parole and without trial. The article “Kids are Kids Until they Commit Crimes” by Lundstrom states that kids will always be kids which means that they can't drive, drink, smoke, etc but as soon as they commit a crime most of them are tried as adults and most of the kids are on there first offence and that too many people is not right if they can't do half of the things adults can do they why do the sentence them as adults. Most kids don't know right from wrong, so why treat them as adults if they're just kids. Kids do lots of bad and stupid thing and mainly because they're not old enough to understand. Therefore you shouldn't have to punish kid as if they’re adult it not right.