ipl-logo

Oath Of Allegiance Analysis

1043 Words5 Pages

In 1921 following the War of Independence, The Anglo-Irish Treaty was signed establishing the Irish Free State, which would grant Ireland limited autonomy as a dominion of Great Britain and have equal status as that of the other dominions. However the Anglo-Irish Treaty had certain conditions that bitterly divided Irish politics. These included the “treaty ports”, the decision for Northern Ireland to “opt-out”, the crown being represented by a governor general and most notoriously the “Oath of Allegiance”. As a result the 1922 Constitution was heavily influenced by the limitations of the treaty. Eamon De Valera strongly opposed it and resigned as President and sought re-election but was defeated by Arthur Griffith and Michael Collins who then …show more content…

the “Treaty Ports”) and foreign affairs.
While under the 1937 Constitution, the role of the British was reduced and while it did not declare a republic, it established the conditions necessary for it to happen. This included according to Ó Tuma (2011) “the position now was that the Oireachtas had an absolute control of the Constitution” and De Valera “abolished the two remaining symbols of imperial power: the Privy Council appeals and the office of governor …show more content…

Under the 1922 Constitution , the role of the executive was according to the Irish Free State Constitution under Article 51 “ The Executive Authority of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Éireann) is hereby declared to be vested in the King” and the head of government shall be a the “President of the Executive Council” and members shall be appointed by the “representative of the crown” based on the Presidents nomination, who in turn according to Article 53 “shall be appointed on the nomination of Dáil Éireann” and lastly if the President lost majority, he must resign along with his ministers, according to Article 53 “shall retire from office should he cease to retain the support of a majority in Dáil

Show More
Related
141 Words | 1 Pages

In your discussion, there are valid points about the Article of Confederation that cripple the government and the states. The balance and supportive evidence allows an articulate flow of your paragraphs as I read along. In an agreement, the Article of Confederation left the government with minimal power and the states with more only provided the instability to those actions and affect the colonist of each state. Also, the uneasiness of the government’s control and the state’s managing within the states left other affairs in question, such as the foreign trade, debt from the previous war and treaties or taxation. However, those issues only formulated the urgency for additional balance among the government and states.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

The Olive Branch Petition was sent from the colonists to Great Britain in hopes of achieving peace and relieving the tensions between them put in place prior to the Battle of Lexington and Concord in 1774. Great Britain responded to the petition with a letter referring to the colonists as traitors to their mother country. This response effectively initiated the Revolutionary War for the colonists. Many varying political views stemmed from whether the colonists should embark on a revolution that would move them out of the guidance of Great Britain and that would provide them independence from Great Britain. Some argued that the revolution would be a “conservative” revolution where every thing will remain largely the same, in terms of political

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

This system also gave limits to the sovereignty of states, such as they could not get rid of national legislation or leave the Union (Champagne,

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

We as Americans can say that we are proud of what we have fought for and achieved. Years ago, oppression of self law and liberties constrained us from being the free men and women we are today. Though we see good in the change, there must be order to the new chaos we have witnessed. We fought as a Union to gain this freedom, yet we act as distant siblings traveling in their own direction. This is why we must formulate a new government, a government for the people, by the people.

Read More
65 Words | 1 Pages

The anarchy that manifested from the imbalanced of power and liberty by the Articles of Confederation and the dysfunctional nature of the military caused mistrust between Americans and their Continental army. As a new country, the mistrust shed the light on how America, in the midst of a revolution, needed an adamant central government in the event that there is another war or national

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

The Articles of Confederation: A Re-Interpretation, “that the confederation was to make the colonies into a single individual: "it is to form us, like separate parcels of metal, into one common mass. We shall no longer retain our separate individuality” (page 137). Adams wanted the nation to unify under one common name and leave behind our stately names. They didn’t want any of their rights to be harmed as well, since the new constitution was being written without a bill of rights and was going to change the voting to be based on population. The Antifederalist were unhappy about this proposed constitution, and they would only agree to its ratification once the smaller states had equal say in congress and the constitution to have a bill of

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was a step in the right direction of democracy. However, the document was fundamentally weak. In this essay, I argue that the Articles of Confederation was not the ideal governmental model. Primarily, the weakness of the Articles of Confederation revolves around the weak central government's inability to tax.

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

What The Pledge of Allegiance Means to Me The Pledge of Allegiance means a lot to me. One thing the Pledge means to me is that we are all one nation. The words “One nation, under God, indivisible, With liberty and justice for all. Another thing the Pledge means to me is that we are all equal.

Read More
383 Words | 2 Pages

Why are the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, and why is this a social issue with some people? First of all the pledge of allegiance was written in 1892. The Pledge became part of the U.S. Flag Code in 1942, and in 1954 President Eisenhower and Congress added the phrase "under God” into the Pledge. The supporters that would like to including "under God" in the Pledge argue that the United States is a Christian nation. At least 80% of Americans support the phrase, and it reflects America’s culture, religious statement, federal law, state constitutions, and the U.S. currency.

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

“With liberty and justice for all” is undoubtedly one of the most commonly spoken phrases in America. Unfortunately, when most Americans speak this phrase, the meaning does not carry through. This closing line from The Pledge of Allegiance, written by Francis Bellamy, aims to show how society during the 1900s needed to be inspired and more actively patriotic (Deppner). With this pledge Bellamy intended to instill the American citizens with a sense of pride and satisfaction in their country.

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

The Pledge of Allegiance was created in 1892 and as seen been the way how most public areas start their day. Now when doing the pledge it is respectful and expected for you to stand in honor of the veterans that have lost their lives for our freedom but some people don’t because of religious beliefs or other factors that are covered by the 1st amendment. In these two articles they show the pros and cons of standing during the pledge and what others think. In the first article, the pro side it states, ”Last year, my final year as a high school teacher before retiring, I had two students who decided to take a knee during the Pledge of Allegiance. I wondered why and framed the question in a way they might not have expected.

Read More
2065 Words | 9 Pages

Routine acts of war officially began with seizure of the Four Courts in June , and for roughly 10 months, the pro-Treaty and anti-Treaty forces fought restlessly, ending in a pro-Treaty victory and the ratification of an Irish Free State . In this essay, I am going to analyze the arguments for and against the Anglo-Irish Treaty in order to ascertain whether my above hypothesis regarding the cause of the Irish Civil War is correct. Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921 While the Irish Nationalists were united during the Irish War of Independence, the signing of the Anglo-Irish Treaty split the party in two. Organized in Sinn Fein and the Irish Republican Army between 1918 and 1921 , the Anglo-Irish Treaty offered Ireland a great deal more of independence than Home Rule would have.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

In “Do We Need God in the Pledge” by Jay Sekulow. Sekulow argues that have the word god in the pledge is not about religion but about patriotism. He says that even though “under God” was not in the original Pledge it was implied because Abraham Lincoln wrote the words “this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom…the government of the people, by the people, shall not perish from the Earth in the Gettysburg Address (Sekulow quoting Lincoln) The fact is Sekulow’s article is based on gaining an emotional response.

Read More
1751 Words | 8 Pages

What is religion? Religion is a way of life founded upon the apprehension of sacredness in existence. In order for something to be considered a religion it must have all eight characteristics of religion incorporated in it. The eight characteristics, there must be are; myths or having a sacred text, having a community or house of worship, rituals must be practiced, ethics are involved, material expressions, worldview or beliefs that everyone in the religion believes, sacredness, and emotional expressions.

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

They are responsible, as the guiding committee of Parliament, for the preparation and enactment of most legislation and of the budget. Now, the Republic system as opposed to the Westminster system is one of representative government, while the Westminster system is one of responsible government, which means that the executive is responsible to the legislature, and requires its confidence to remain in power. While in the U.S system, the executive are separate from the legislature, in the

Read More

More about Oath Of Allegiance Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document