Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of women in leadership roles
Researchs title on women empowerment since 2020
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this paper I will be going over issue 17, “Has the Women’s Movement of the 1970’s Failed to Liberate American Women?”. Sara M. Evans and F. Carolyn Graglia each voice their opinions about the issue. They talk about the history of the women’s movement throughout time and the effects it had in our country. F. Carolyn Graglia writes about how she agrees the movement has failed to liberate American women. Her views on feminism concluded that the feminist movement of the 1960’s and 1970’s was a reasonable but a faulty idea, in that it was based on a worthy opinion (that all men and women should be equal).
In “Coalitions as a Model for Intersectionality: From Practice to Theory,” Elizabeth Cole addresses how the intersectional approach should be utilized to form coalitions that seek to advance marginalized populations (1). However, unlike the feminist movement, that narrowly defined its goals and constituency, these newly formed coalitions should be broad based, incorporating diverse populations and directives. Moreover, the alliances can even be formed by seemingly unlike populations, which when analyzed through the intersectional lens, may share similar experiences and goals. In addition, by examining the numerous axis of gender, race, and other intersectional components, one can identify other similarities not previously recognized.
The predominant ideas put forth in the piece from the Combahee River Collective were those that addressed the shortcomings of the feminist movement to include all women and to address the full range of issues that oppress individuals and groups of people in our patriarchal society. This greatly furthered my ongoing development and understanding of what intersectionality is, what its goals are, and how it can help everyone instead of the predominately white, cisgendered, heterosexual, upper middle class women that composed and continue to compose a large portion of the feminist movement. One of the biggest shortcomings that are addressed in this piece focused on the racism within the feminist movement and its limited or even minimal efforts
Some may live through being sexually abused, live in extreme poverty, or even fall victim of being physical or verbally abused. Whatever the reason is, this book shows an outlet for these struggles. The only way we can help others fight these intersectionality issues is by knowing your privilege and using it to help the oppressed with no voice. In Brittney Cooper’s article “Feminism’s ugly internal clash: Why its future is not up to the white women” she states that “the future of feminism is not up to the white women. Not by themselves anyway”.
She contends that these problems must be addressed in conjunction with other social and economic challenges since they are essential to establishing true gender equality. The book is divided into several chapters, each of which centers on a specific topic related to Kendall’s idea of hood feminism. She examines issues such as the criminal justice system, reproductive rights, food insecurity, and the impact of poverty on women's lives. She also explores the concept of intersectionality and how it applies to feminist activism, arguing that we cannot talk about gender inequality without also addressing racism, classism, and other forms of oppression.
The generic feminist movement consists of “white, middle-class heterosexual women” (Tong 42). These women focus on their needs, and neglect the specific needs of many women of color, who are often of a lower socioeconomic standing. White feminists focus on liberating the oppressive “housewife role,” (Tong 214) and fail to even attempt to include minority women who may in fact dream of a life in which they were able to stay home with their children. White feminists “fail to realize that it is possible to oppress people by ignoring their differences” (Tong 214). This issue makes it difficult for many non-white women to relate to or desire to be a part of the feminist movement.
Feminist literature examines how the language used by the Muskoka Initiative that is paternalistic and essentialist and does not include gender equality in its mandate (Tiessan). It critiques not only the way women are portrayed by the initiative as mothers instead of women, but also how patriarchal and essentialist understandings of women are perpetuated because the initiative fails to address the systemic gender barriers women face. Maternal mortality cannot be overcome unless gender equality is addressed, because in order to move forward in women’s health women’s rights need to be protected, promoted, and advanced (Hord and Wolf). The literature also highlights how Canada, as a country with progressive conceptions of women’s rights needs to use this stance to support programs both at home and abroad that allow for women and girls to achieve gender equality.
The Every Women Matters Program was a program that was put in place to for women to get early cervical and breast cancer screening testing done. This program was for low-income women in the state of Nebraska. Seven different private practices participated in this program. This paper will discuss the reason the program was put into place as well as the reasons it failed.
Nancy Fraser captures this sentiment in her argument on recognition and redistribution (Rai, 1999:87). While quotas increase the representation of women, it is mainly elite women who have access to the political system, which does not directly translate into policies that address the needs of poor women. Although quotas can overcome barriers to “equality of opportunity,” the relationship between women’s increased representation and the pursuit of gender equitable public policy is not always linear. As Fraser has articulated, women’s struggles for justice thus encompass both struggles for recognition as well as for redistribution (Rai, 1999: 87). Thus seeing representation through the recognition-redistribution lens offers new ways to think
Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. Throughout history, many very influential women have contributed to the rise of the feminist movement and distinguished what it meant to be a feminist. It is very important to recognize that the goals of feminism have changed vastly over time. We see this in the documents written by Olympe de Gouges in France, 1791, who some recognize as the world’s first feminist, and bell hooks in the United States in 2000, who is known for her feminist theory focused on intersectionality. The goals of feminism have changed over time, which can be seen in Olympe de Gouges's Declaration of the Rights of Woman, and bell hook’s Sisterhood is Still Powerful.
Compassion, diversity, self-development, community, and inclusion: the foundational pillars of the Working Women Community Center (“Working Women Community Centre”). Imagine arriving at a foreign country, one that’s about to be your new home, knowing little to nothing about what your new life is going to look like. That is a shared sentiment amongst immigrant women trying to assimilate into a Canadian lifestyle. The Working Women Community Center (WWCC) is an organization that gives women the support they need to transition smoothly to their new life. Not only do they offer programs to facilitate this change, but they also provide the women and their families economic relief in a time of financial constraint.
The Religion of Wicca originated in the early twentieth century as part of contemporary paganism. It was founded by the “father” of Wicca, Gerald Gardner. Wicca is a form of Paganism, said to have derived from pre modern Europe. Wicca was founded and based on the idea that witches are not followers of Satan, but rather followers of pre-Christians. Today there are various types of Wiccan’s religions.
Both Marxism and Feminism strive to produce a community in which their vision of equality can be achieved. The reason that feminism, and its means, can be viewed as a more tangible approach to securing this is that it goal is to do so from within currently used political ideologies, morphing their more exploitive concepts. This strongly contrasts to Marxism’s approach which calls for a complete reworking of both political and economic structures in order to complete its objective, this radical approach to correcting inequality though well thought out conceptually would be extremely difficult to implement as all dramatic shifts from the status quo are. This difficulty in execution does not invalidate the ideology but to most relegate it to a pool of conceptual ideas to draw from. Though feminism is also difficult to class a fully formed ideology lacking in certain areas making more suited to acting as a driving force behind a pressure group, the proposals it puts forwards, as seen in both recent and past events, are able to gain traction and be incorporated into mainstream
There are several question that are asked surrounding feminism. One of them are questions about women's role in research like is there a feminist research research different from other social science research and are there any specific feminist research methods? If one believes that feminist research is research about women, by women, and for women, then one may conclude that there are distinct methods that feminists use to study the oppression of women. Also, if one believes, as does Liz Stanley (1993), that there is a direct relationship between feminist consciousness and feminism, then there is research that is distinctly feminist. In trying to answer the above posed questions, we need to examine not only political ideologies as suggested
CHAPTER ONE 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY The concept of women empowerment seems to have been used in the 1980s by third world feminists ‘to address the issue of gender differences that exist in the control and distribution of resources’ (Datta & Kornberg, 2002). There is however lack of consensus on its major characteristics. According to Datta and Kornberg (2002), women empowerment refers to ‘strategies that women use to increase their control of resources and generate decision making capacity’. Other authors like Batliwala (1994) however have a wider definition.