“The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves.” Julius Caesar articulates a story of fragmented friendships caused by the thirst for power, and a war caused by similar occurrences. Consequently, I agree that this play expresses a story of lost morality in the political sphere. Caesar’s close companion, Brutus, loses all morals and exterminates Caesar. His reasoning behind this being, he has a need for political supremacy. Furthermore, this causes an uproar among many others in the political sphere, instigating more people to lose their morals. As has been noted, Caesar’s close companion, Brutus, loses all morals and murders Caesar. Without his morals, Brutus sees no wrong in killing his beloved friend, and he murders him thinking that he is doing the right thing. Comparatively, his morals in the beginning almost stop him from going through with this horrendous action, but in the end he still finds himself assassinating Caesar. Nevertheless, losing track of what is right, and what is wrong, can blind …show more content…
Ordinarily, that Caesar’s followers are confused and hurt when they find out that he has been killed. This causes an uproar amongst the city people, and it causes them to also lose their morals, like Brutus. Accordingly, the city goes into a civil war, one group being the people that were thirsty for power, and the other group being the followers of Caesar. Correspondingly, both groups have lost morality in the political sphere. In conclusion, I agree that this play tells a story of lost morality in the political sphere. Caesar’s beloved friend, Brutus, loses morality and murders Caesar because he has a need for political power. Furthermore, this causes an uproar among many others in the political sphere, causing more people to lose their morals. When faced with an opportunity to seize power, morals become