Did Federalists oppose the Louisiana Purchase for practical reasons or political reasons? The Federalists took it from a more political view with some ethical points regarding putting in new states through the executive branch, treatings, and slavery, (Document B ). Hamilton himself hates Jefferson and tried to make him look dumb and lucky and tried to make the possibility of success slim(Document A ). In Document B Rufus King is concerned about admitting new states with treaties through the executive branch or Congress, but if they do they have to follow their treaty and help settlers and property owners have their property “protected”. They are also worried about treating slaves unequally coming from the current increase of the representation
To the United States Senate and House of Representatives, I am a member of the Cherokee nation currently residing in the state of Georgia. Over the past several years, I have watched as the citizens of Georgia have begun coming onto Cherokee land and slowly attempting to take over. Although I do know that a cause of this sudden disruption was the discovery of gold on our land, this does not change the fact that our fathers, yours and mine, have taken part in multiple agreements over the years which established these land boundaries. However, it has recently become aware to me that it seems we have entered into a Treaty of New Echota, which promises us land in the West, money, and compensation for our lands lost, given that we remove ourselves from our native land within two years time. I have several grievances regarding this agreement, the first of which being that the treaty is not a true binding settlement.
The Louisiana Purchase Dear Editor: I think that Thomas Jefferson and the United States Government should buy the port of New Orleans because they need the get the port so that we can trade and expand the United States. One of the vast reasons that we bought the hefty territory was that we wanted total control of the New Orleans port so we could further our trade. We wanted to be in total control of the port because they stopped our trade and we needed to import and export goods. Another reason was the we wanted the port so we could trade whenever and no one could stop out trade.
Many countries went through changes like the U.S. The U.S grew physically by gaining more land, it grew politically through making the government stronger, and it grew socially by people gaining opportunities and rights. The U.S was originally 13 states. Thomas Jefferson bought land from France to expand the country. This event in history was called the ‘Louisiana Purchase’.
Fort Maurepas was the first European settlement in what would become the Southeastern United States, and was crucial to determining the fate of the region for centuries to come. After La Salle’s expedition down the Mississippi River, the French saw a vital need to find a colony near the mouth
Also, with the control of the Mississippi river we could now have stronger trade and be able to use the Mississippi river for different things. This evidence supports that it was a very smart move that the United States decided to make the Louisiana Purchase with France. To conclude, the Louisiana Purchase was a very smart move by the United States because this allowed many positive thing to happen. First, it allowed the western country to have peace and prosperity mainly with the Indians and opened a free and valuable market. Second, it doubled the size of the United States making it a bigger and stronger nation.
If we were to find the unit price of how much every acre of land cost for this purchase, it would amount to four cents per acre. Which is four cents for every 43,560 square feet of land. With this land, and the amount of resources we could gain from it, we could easily repay our debt with trade after gaining an abundant amount of new resources, which is why I don’t think this argument that The Columbian Centinel made is very valid. With this land, we gain more power, and power can easily lead to money, yet with the $15 million, we wouldn’t gain as much power as we would with buying the land. In summation, the reason why I would’ve approved of the ratification of the Louisiana purchase is because America’s land would be doubled in size, many new opportunities and minerals would be discovered, and the amount of money we would have to pay compared to the amount of land was so little, which made the bargain too good of an offer to pass.
The dilemma that bourdons me the most is that if I buy this Louisiana Purchase then I will not be following the constitution. I have always said that I need to follow the constitution strictly. The constitution does not give me, the president, the power to buy land for the nation. If I buy this land I could be going against the constitution, but I cannot pass up this offer to double the United States overnight.
It was obvious to Jefferson that there was a fundamental political dilemma in running on a platform that advocates for a lesser role in government only to increase it in the purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Jefferson now hesitated with his decision due to the political
The Louisiana Purchase was one of the most significant things to happen to the United States of America in its earlier years. It was the greatest real estate deal in U.S. history, it allowed for westward expansion, and it changed the nation. The Louisiana Purchase was one of the most, if not the most, important event in U.S. history. The Louisiana Purchase was the greatest real estate deal in the history of the world.
The Louisiana Purchase began the westward expansion of the United States in the 1840s. Settlers began moving themselves into the new land, exploring and finding out the benefits and costs of living in a previoulsy uninhabited area. A family of five people followed the trend, moving to a section of land near some of their family. The mother, father, and three sons had been on their journey for weeks. The mother tended to her husband, who had broken his leg not too long ago by tripping over some rocks and falling into a ditch.
Jefferson’s dilemma in the Louisiana Purchase In April of 1803 Thomas Jefferson was faced with many moral dilemmas in the process of buying the Louisiana territory. Though the price for the territory was beyond generous, Jefferson felt that by purchasing the territory he would be going against his beliefs that the constitution should be followed word for word. The constitution said nothing of the president having the power to purchase land from another government, or to use money of the states for the same purpose (“the moral dilemma”). Another problem was once the land was purchased, there was a fear that it could have been a waste since they had no way to know the layout of the land, and what it would be useful for.
The vast territories gained with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, opened up a slew of disputed between the North and South over the issue regarding slavery and its expansion west. The possibility of western states becoming slave states created the greatest debate of the nineteenth century. In 1819, there were an equal number of free states and slave states which maintained a delicate balance of representatives in the senate. However, when Missouri applied for statehood into the Union as a slave state it threatened to break the delicate balance and grant political representation in favor of the South. Desperately trying to prevent this balance from breaking, Representative James Tallmadge Jr. of New York, proposed a resolution to ban the transport
The land mass was first claimed by france, ceded to Spain in 1762, and then ceded back to France nearly 40 years later. History in unclear whether France first offered it to the U.S. or the U.S. showed interest in it to buy it from France. In a Note to U.S. minister Robert Livingston, Thomas jefferson, The Third President said “The day that France takes possession of New Orleans…we must marry ourselves
In America’s history there have been many events or times that have in a way changed and shaped how we live today. The Louisiana Purchase could be recognized as one of the best and most impressive real estate purchases of Thomas Jefferson’s past. Also, this purchase could be looked at as one of the most important events in America’s past. Many historians would agree on this, but many opinions would be different on the fact if this purchase was actually worth the buy or not. Even Jefferson himself would have some doubts about the purchase.
