ipl-logo

Loving V. Loving Vs. Virginia Court Case

774 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Racial discrimination in the united states

1967, a court case was brought up to supreme court, involving two people, a white male and a black female fighting for their right to love each other without having any consequences. One night this married couple were arrested and banished and even jailed due to the fact these two people were just sleeping in the same bed and living in the same house. The laws prohibiting the right to interracial marriage and these two to even be together was called miscegenation laws. These laws prohibited any different race from being together, especially blacks and whites. The loving vs. Virginia court case proved that miscegenation laws were unconstitutional and exchanged back equality after the case was resolved, these laws didn’t allow any race to marry another and had unnecessary rules and punishments …show more content…

The equality act holds the evidence of allowing everyone to be considered and given permission to be equal and have rights. But because of the rules against marriage between two different people not in the same race, the act is not being followed and being held back from these people and their natural born rights. Mildred Loving and her white husband Richard Loving got married in Washington since miscegenation laws didn’t allow them to marry in Virginia, they came back to their home and arrested later in the middle of the night because they were living together and because they were together and married they got jailed for a year and banished from Virginia for twenty five years. These laws made them guilty for just loving each other and living together. Miscegenation laws take away their rights to do all of those things and they make the white man unequal to the colored person. Miscegenation laws are found to be unlawful and unconstitutional because it doesn’t allow two different races to feel equal to each other and provide there equal rights crossing and ignoring the equality

Show More
Related
999 Words | 4 Pages

The government of Mississippi charged his great-grandson with charges of miscegenation, which is two people of different race having sexual relations with one another. This was back in a time when most southers still believed that even if you had a drop of African-American blood, that a person was a “negro”. Because his great-grandmother was African-American, he was convicted of miscegenation and sentenced to five years in prison. However, the state supreme court overturned the decision because the court didn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was ⅛

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

Don’t Sleep Through the Amendment Annoyed about the loss of the civil war and hoping to declare continued superiority over the blacks of the South, the Southern states created the poll tax. All who wanted to vote in 1904 Virginia had to pay a tax of a dollar and fifty cents a price about thirty dollars in today’s money. Because of its high price poor whites and most African Americans were not able to vote because they were generally poor. Many saw the injustice of the poll tax and tried to push for its demise. “The poll taxes themselves were at one point ruled not to be unconstitutional in the Breedlove v. Suttles case because it did not violate the provisions set forth by either the Fourteenth Amendment or the Fifteenth Amendment”

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

Within our contemporary society, the Bill of Rights serves as symbol of the basic American freedoms and protects individuals from irrational government policies, which are not explicitly stated in the Constitution. In the Supreme Court case Maryland v. King, the culprit, Alonzo Jay King, utilized the Fourth Amendment after Maryland police arrested him for first and second-degree assault and swabbed his mouth to collect his DNA in order to check for any previous crimes committed. King argued that the practice of collecting DNA was unconstitutional because Maryland did not have a definite reason to analyze his DNA, as this intruded his privacy and that law enforcements would abuse the collection of DNA in order to convict people of unrelated

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

The Road to Ending Institutional Racism in America The road to end institutional racism in America was rocky, to say the least. It was filled with many setbacks, and triumphant victories that would shape the course of American history. Two court cases in particular, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, played a significant role in challenging Americas “separate but equal” doctrine. The ruling and precedent first set by Plessy v. Ferguson, was then challenged by Brown v. Board of Education, resulting in them relating to each other based on a changed precedent.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In the stories of Loving V. Virginia and “ Desiree’s baby ” both take place back in the day when racism was prevalent. The United States Supreme Court invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage. Although one of them is a fictional story while for the other one is an article on a real case that happened. After a close reading of Loving V. Virginia and the fictional story Desiree 's Baby by Kate Cho both couples react to interracial marriage in a way that demonstrates race relations don’t allow them to be happy and they believe they are as equal as anybody else and deserve to live how they choose to live. Loving V. Virginia took place in 1967 back then normal couples were considered as two people of the same race.

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

In the movie “The Loving Story”, the director Nancy Buirski presents a story about love and fight for the right of interracial marriage and social justice. In 1958, a white man whose name Richard Loving and his black fiancée Mildred Jeter travelled from Virginia to Washington to get married in a time when interracial marriage was illegal in most of the states in the United States including Virginia, according to the movie. However, the director shows that Mildred and Richard Loving were arrested in Virginia when they came back for violating a Virginia law that forbidden marriage between people of different races. Therefore, the couple had to leave Virginia so that they can live together with their children in Washington, D.C. A long way from

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

In the late 1940s, it was a popular belief that if you were one race you could not love the opposite race. When people use the word “interracial” or “mixed” most people refer to African american and white people. However, the first anti miscegenation law was that “sex and marriage between whites and those of swarthy complexion”(David, 28), was deemed unconstitutional. These laws applied to whites and anyone of color.

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

Interracial marriage may not be as controversial as it once was, but it is still rare between blacks and whites. Miscegenation laws were established in colonial times and lasted for hundreds of years. They were invented for many reasons including fear, power, and control of a population. Each of the riots described above all related back to the fear of interracial sex. Keeping the white race pure became a priority as miscegenation laws had a foundation in white supremacy.

Read More
384 Words | 2 Pages

Alliyah Sharpe In the Southern states, there are Jim Crow laws, which are state and local laws that enforce segregation. The Louisiana Separate Car Act states that there is “separate but equal” train car accommodations for Blacks and Whites. This idea of “separate but equal” is not only used in train cars, but also used among many public spaces such as restrooms, water fountains, hospitals, etc, but it’s clear what blacks receive isn’t equal to whites. In an effort to cease the law and others, a citizens’ committee and railroad company created a case that would challenge the court.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

In modern day now whites and black marry each other. If this were to happen back then people probably would have been killed because they thought of it as a sin. The constitution talks about having “equal rights” among everyone, but really they didn't have equal rights. The whites had more power than the blacks.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

This case was not just an event in history, but a strong point that supported and still supports equality to this day. People can use this case to help support their reasoning for what they believe in and why certain actions should

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

In addition to being mistreated, laws were created to prohibit interracial marriage. In 1967 people believed that it was "preserving 'racial integrity '" (Loving v. Virginia). Many people were called ignorant for thinking about the situation differently. The Equal Protection Law was violated because

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

unclear to the human minds, but studies have shown that some possible causes are inherent germ cells, hormone and vitamin deficiencies, trauma or anxiety, diabetes or diseases, or even malformations of the uterus. The second type of abortion is called an induced abortion (Abortion). An induced abortion consists of a procedure in which a baby or fetus as it is most referenced to is intentionally killed, literally scraping the baby away from its developing life in a mother’s womb. This is murder. Having the intention of killing a human being is not morally right and should have never been thought to be a legal action or practice in the first place.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

Although, the constitution was set in place to allow have equal right and to have justice, there were still some states created laws and policies to prohibit affairs based on ethnic’s and genders . According to McLaughlin v Florida, the court ruled racial classification as invalid a Florida statue that allows more server penalties for cohabitation and adultery by interracial couples than same race pairs. Justice potter steward simply said it wasn’t possible for a state law to valid under our constitution. I honestly believe that discrimination is taught and not genetic. in the article , they also talked about events that happen after miscegenation was legal which were an church elected leaders disinter a mixed race infant who was buried in it all white

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction Richard Loving and Mildred Jeter, defined under Virginia’s 1924 Racial Integrity Act as an interracial couple, married in June 1958 in Washington, D. C., and returned home to Caroline County. However, their happiness did not last long as they were arrested in early July for violating Virginia’s law against interracial marriage, convicted and sentenced to one year in jail in suspension. In 1965, they obtained help from American Civil Liberties Union, which unsuccessfully sought to reverse their convictions in the state courts of Virginia and then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which, in the case of Loving v. Virginia (1967), overturned all state laws restricting marriage on the basis of race. Therefore, focusing on the controversy

Read More

More about Loving V. Loving Vs. Virginia Court Case

Related Topics

Open Document