Mahabharat Analysis

716 Words3 Pages

Mahabharat presents the story of the throne of Hastinapur, the kingdom ruled by the Kuru clan where Kauravas and the Pandavas brothers compete for rulership. Both Duryodhan and Yudhisthir claim to be first in line to inherit the throne. When Bhishma asked for Gandhari 's hand in marriage for his blind nephew Dhritarashtra, her brother Shakuni got furious. But he later agreed when Bhishma persuaded them that Dhritrashtra would be the future king of Hastinapur. During the Coronation Ceremony; Dhritrashtra’s younger brother Pandu was made the king with the high interfluence of Vidura(Dhritrashtra’s another younger brother). Shakuni felt that he was cheated and so he swore to himself that he would destroy the Kuru race. He sowed the seeds of the climactic battle during the adolescence of the Kauravas (Sons of Dhritarashtra) and the Pandavas (Sons of …show more content…

Tiwari wrote that "If it maintains the quality of writing and able actors who portray key characters, we may have another winner among us". DNA praised the costumes, scenery, Krishna 's flute theme, and most of the CGI special effects, but said the story pace was too fast. However, as the series progressed, it soon beated all its comparisons with the earlier hugely popular BR Chopra version and carved its own unique space in the history of Indian television, especially among the youth. The original series was supposed to be a 120 episode series but as the show raked in ratings as it progressed, two more extensions were given. Its premier had a viewership of approximately 8.4 million people, the highest for any weekday show in Indian television on its first day of launch.The show has become the highest rated weekday mythology show in the last three years on Indian