ipl-logo

Mahatma Gandhi's Moral Courage

785 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on brave mahatma gandhi

Even though Mohandas Gandhi was small in size his impact on India’s independence was tremendous. Gandhi had moral courage in fighting for India 's independence. Secondly, when fighting for India 's independence, he used non-violent protesting. Finally, because he used non-violence, his moral courage cost him his life. By examining Gandhi’s fight for India’s independence, non-violent protesting, and how his moral courage costing him his life, it is clear that he was a beautiful and courageous man, who fought for what he believed in. Gandhi’s first act of moral courage was “standing up and fighting for India’s independence, despite the threats from certain groups of people that were against Gandhi’s movements and beliefs” (How did …show more content…

He believed that not any situation should have violence. For example, he did not use violence even when the police arrested him for no reason. Also, when he was attacked by a mob of white people in Durban, he did not want to press charges against the mob of people. He said “it was one of his principles, not to seek redress the world no matter the risks and consequences of his actions”. Even though he had some injuries he still did not want to press charges, which revealed Gandhi really did not like violence and he would do anything to display to the people that you can solve differences without violence. Gandhi connects to the Holocaust because he had a positive impact on India and the Holocaust left a negative impact on the Jews, so they both left tremendous impacts. Also, they are similar because Gandhi felt what he was doing was right, so did Hitler. Another example is after Gandhi was arrested for no reason he did not think all police were mean , just as the Jews did not think all Germans were mean. Gandhi also caused riots just as Hitler caused riots. The only difference is Gandhi was a great man and Hitler was not. Also Gandhi fought for his life and many Jews fought for their lives just as well, and the outcome for many Jews was the same they both got something out of the non-violent

Show More
Related
326 Words | 2 Pages

Could you picture around 6 million people? Now how would you feel if all of them were killed right now? All of them being killed because they were African American or they were Mexican. The Holocaust was when the Nazi’s led by Adolf Hitler persecuted, tortured, and killed people just because they were Jewish. People were separated from their families and gassed or burned just to keep up with how many people were coming into the camp, or just to amuse themselves.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

There are a lot of similar between them. When Adolf was a leader he gave courage to the lower middle class and unemployed that one day Germany will end the suffer. Kamehame wanted to influence the people so he would work as a commoner all day and night, they inspire their people to do more then be negative . There was also a time when country economy improve and unemployed dropped when Hitler became a leader.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi Manav Patel Mahatma Karamchand Gandhi was a humanitarian who used peaceful topics to fight for the freedom of India. He walked 250 miles from his Ashram to Dandi, a coast off of Eastern India. He then proceeded to pick up a lump of salt, thereby defying British Law. This story leads us to ask the question, why did Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? Basically, he could convince the people to join him instead of killing off nonbelievers.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

¨ The- Germans were already in town, the fascist were already in power, the verdict had already been pronounced, yet the Jew of sight continued to smile ¨ ( Wiesel 18).The Holocaust was Adolf Hitlers plan to exterminate the European Jews. During world war ll six million Jews were massacred by the Nazis. The Jew was forced to a camp and the Nazi will also forced Jew to work to the death and if they seem too weak to work they will be executed. Also They made camp for the Jews for them to all stay in one place because the German believed the Jew was the cost for world war 1 and the jews was making the world to a worst place.

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

The Nazis had empowerment over people. The Nazis (Adolf Hitler) were convinced that if the Jewish people were exterminated, it would be a much better place to live. Innocent people were killed. The Holocaust and The Crucible are about killing people that are different.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Gandhi people manage their anger and have peace against the British. He did this by creating a philosophy and encouraging people to follow that philosophy. Gandhi also used peace instead of violence against the British. Gandhi did this because he believed that he can achieve peace among everybody. Gandhi’s philosophy didn't work on everyone.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.

Read More
75 Words | 1 Pages

The Holocaust began many tragedies, many people dying and going through pain, being beaten and hung because they were jews. The Peace Resistance was to help many people get back to their old ways and connect back with their families if they had survived. Many jews were blamed for many things that were not true, they were treated the way there because non-jews believed Hitler and others who thought jews were not the perfect

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Civil Disobedience by Thoreau is the refusal to obey government demands or commands and nonresistance to consequent arrest and punishment this had an extreme effect on Martin Luther King Jr and Mahatma Gandhi. They were fighting for different beliefs. However they both had the same believes about civil disobedience and they both end in the same place, jail. In the first place Gandhi believed that the only way to confronted injustice was with non-violent methods.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

For instance, one difference is where they took place. The Holocaust was mostly in Europe and the Rwandan genocide was in Africa (Rwanda). The fact that they were so far away from each other proves that genocides can happen anywhere. Some just because one person doesn't like a group (Hitler in reference to the Holocaust). Both groups took their “victims” by surprise per-say.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Due to the race inequality along with the economic regulations among the Indian people, Gandhi’s ambition from the beginning of simply just wanting equality between the Indian and British transition to wanting India to become Independence. He wanted to give the Indian citizen a voice in the government and a chance to define their own nation. The Indian people lose their political power in terms of how the British authorities were exercising their power over them, implementing policies according to their own rules and administrating over the Indian’s resources. Gandhi throughout the film had the desire to help gain back India’s political power and it revolves around his method of passive resistance and self-sacrifice. He belief in “an eye for an eye only makes people blind” is what helped him achieve freedom for India without any violence involve.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr “You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty,” Mohandas Gandhi quoted. I have extremely admired Gandhi because his whole life be worked and fought for India’s Independence from the British Empire. Also another important person whom I have respected is Martin Luther King .Jr who attracted many people to his cause by delivering his speech “I have a dream.”

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

The permissive parenting style best exemplifies Rex and Rosemary Walls’ parenting because they rarely discipline their children, they act more like their kids friends than their parents, and they do not believe in their children’s success. Rex and Rosemary didn’t concern themselves when punishing their children for doing bad things. “It was self -defense, I piped. Dad had always said that self- defense was a justifiable reason for shooting someone” (89). Most parents would have punished their children for shooting someone, so parents who wouldn’t are considered permissive parents.

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

Worksheet #5 Mohandas K Gandhi argues that nonviolence is the path for a long term solution and for reaching our goal. He also explains civilization as not a benefit but instead a disaster and dangerous, that it builds laziness and hard work for the low class. He further explains that one side benefits in a greedy matter but the other side is left bare. Additionally, Dietrich Bonhoeffer describes the difference between cheap grace and costly grace.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Gandhi always made sure that they kept the movement nonviolent. They had meetings on how they were going to approach the movement, they were organized and had a plan. Gandhi got many of his ideas and principles through reading the bible, reading the Bhagavad Gita, and writers like Henry David Thoreau. Gandhi and the Indian people created some dilemmas to throw the British government off balance. Gandhi told the Indian people to boycott all British goods and only buy Indian goods.

Read More

More about Mahatma Gandhi's Moral Courage

Related Topics

Open Document