Mahatma Gandhi once said “There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supersedes all other courts.” One key term in Gandhi’s statement is justice, which means the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law. Another key term in Mahatma Gandhi’s statement is conscience, which means the sense of moral goodness in a person’s character that makes him or her feel an obligation to do right. Taken as a whole, Gandhi means that unlawful behavior is acceptable when a person’s actions are for a greater good. Furthermore, Gandhi implies in his statement that when the criminal justice system fails to provide righteousness, taking the unjust situation upon him or herself is valid. Finally, when looked under the Lens of William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi’s statement can be proven true through Shakespeare’s use of conflict between Brutus and his honor.
Firstly, Shakespeare’s portrayal of conflict demonstrates that Mahatma Gandhi’s declaration is verifiable. For example, Brutus battles with his honor at his house after
…show more content…
By doing so, this helps to prove that Mahatma Gandhi’s statement is true. Similarly, in 1955, where racism was especially prominent, a courageous woman named Rosa Parks performed an illegal act. She refused to give up her seat in the colored section of the bus to a white person. As a result, she was arrested and spent a day in jail. Rosa Parks changed an immoral law in order do live in an equal world. Despite her actions being criminal during that time period, she is a role model for society. What must be taken away from this analysis is that moral duty trumps the criminal justice system because, in the end, people are the ones that have to live with their