In this essay, MLK and Malcolm X’s philosophies will be discussed to find out who made more sense for the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960’s. This topic will be discussed with topics such as methods of violence and nonviolence while fighting for civil rights and whether people should work together while fighting for civil rights. MLK and Malcolm X both fought for civil rights while using different methods to achieve what they wanted. MLK had seemingly always believed in a nonviolent approach to achieving his goal. His famous “I Have a Dream” speech shown in document 2 shows how passionate he is about achieving this goal for civil rights in a peaceful way. However, this doesn’t mean that Malcom X advocated for a violent approach to achieve his goal. In document 9, Malcom X says, “I don’t favor violence. If we could bring about recognition and respect of our people by peaceful means, well and good. Everybody would like to reach their objectives peacefully. But I’m also a realist.” This shows how Malcolm X wishes that he could fight for civil rights peacefully, but he knows he can’t. Malcolm X then goes on to say, “The only people in this country …show more content…
Document 3 shows how Malcom X wanted people to work in conjunction to make this fight for civil rights easier. “I tell sincere white people, “Work in conjunction with us - each of us working among our own kind.” Malcom X wanted both white and black people to work separately in their own communities because he felt that them working separately would actually in turn result in everyone working together. However, MLK wished for everyone to work together directly as seen in his “I Have a Dream” speech in document 2. “With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to climb up to freedom together, knowing that we will be free one