ipl-logo

How Does Malthusian Principle Of Population Affect The Way We Live?

2110 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Thomas malthus’s essay

IS MALTHUS STILL ALIVE? This paper is a faithful and unbiased restatement of Malthus’s original 1798 ‘An Essay on the principle of Population as it affects the future improvement of society with remarks on speculations of Mr Godwin, Mr Condorcet and others’ aiming to rehabilitate this man’s reputation. Now why I say reputation is because Jaffery Sachs (2008), a development theorist of repute says Malthusian reasoning was a target of mockery, held up by his professors as an example of a naïve forecast gone wildly wrong! #ORIGINS: Malthus published six versions of his famous treatise “An Essay on the principle of population” appearing first in 1798 while the last edition came out in 1826. He acknowledges his work as a reaction to the work of …show more content…

By inductive reasoning he claims them “Fixed” since we haven’t seen any alteration in them by seeing man’s history on earth and therefore have no right to conclude that they will ever cease to be what they are now. Population & Subsistence He refers to the fixed laws which makes food necessary to the life of man and concludes that effect of these two unequal powers must be kept equal from where one finds his “Principle of Population” whereby population must always be kept down to the level of means of production. He states that having assumed his postulates granted the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man which is true since geometric progression definitely leads ahead of arithmetic progression. Population when Unchecked, increased in a geometrical ratio which he takes from his observation of USA population and since there was little scarcity and land was abundant, he takes the time of 25 years in which USA population doubled as the standard time for doubling of population when unchecked and the growth of subsistence in an arithmetic …show more content…

Others critique that Malthus was wrong since he didn’t foresee the dramatic increase in production of food, but it is clear in his writings that he anticipated this well in advance, ‘No limits whatever are placed to the productions of the earth; they may increase for ever and be greater than any assignable quantity, yet still the power of population being a power of a superior order, the increase of the human species can only be kept commensurate to the increase of the means of subsistence by the constant operation of the strong law of necessity acting as a check upon the greater power. It makes no difference how much productivity increases, Malthus writes, it could not long keep up with unrestrained reproduction. Population must be constantly checked to keep it in line with what the earth can

Show More
Related
1151 Words | 5 Pages

He begins by arguing that that men do not choose their opinions. Instead, these opinions naturally follow from the arguments and evidence that are “proposed to their minds” (PR 18). That is, opinions and beliefs are involuntary. They are not chosen and, although they can be influenced by what a person is exposed to, they ultimately follow from how the mind reasons out the evidence that it collects. This means that beliefs simply cannot be changed by outside decrees or forced into submission by others.

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

In August of 1969 a chaotic time with new fears of overpopulation had begun. A Stanford University biologist by the name of Paul Ehrlich had predicted doom for the world because of overpopulation. He believed that because we had a finite planet with finite resources, that we could not continue to procreate without suffering dire consequences. Later he wrote a book called “The Population Bomb” which put all of his theories together. Stewart Brand and Adrienne Germaine looked up to Paul thinking that what he was predicting would happen in the future.

Read More
1047 Words | 5 Pages

Without the checks of crop failures and famines as mentioned by Hardin (588), the human population will continue to grow, which will eventually lead to a food shortage

Read More
1739 Words | 7 Pages

The ecological catchcry of 'limits to growth ' takes on a new meaning

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Tal uses a famine happened in China in 1958 to 1961 as an example against “technological optimists”. A lot of people passed away in that famine. This is a strong evidence to show us that it is matter to control the population and environmental sources at the balance level. Tal claims that setting up a law is a good way to slow down the population growing. He makes an example of Bangladesh, Iran, Singapore and Thailand; they all have significant success on controlling the birth rate.

Read More
1031 Words | 5 Pages

The two theories on how mortality affected population growth rate during the agricultural revolution are discussed as follows. Theory 1: Mortality declined Regular food supply The agricultural revolution brought about regular and regular more reliable food supply. Unlike when the people would still hunt and gather their own food which was not a reliable form of food supply because nomadic people had to move from one place to another in search of food that they can eat. Agriculturalists would just plant their own food and maintain it so that they are sure of what they will produce and when it will be consumable.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

Promoting sustainable development in South America is an incredibly important goal. Millions of people in the developing world face economic, educational, and health hurdles. Overpopulation is one of the many issues facing the region. High population growth generally coincides with low education levels and poor health care. Overpopulation diminishes resources in a country and increases poverty.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

He draws heavily from the philosophy of Thomas Malthus to argue that a zero-sum game of resource depletion will eventually lead to an economic collapse of human civilization. While critics may object to the criticisms presented, many of Hardin’s empirical claims have been proven untrue. The world does not operate as a zero-sum game – increases in efficiency, the limitless potential of materials as resources, and decreasing populations have created a scenario of ever increasing wealth across the world. Over the last thirty years alone global poverty has fallen by 30% (Qui, 2016). Hardin’s article is an interesting historical artifact, but it should not be used to describe the world as it exists

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Especially, he divides his idea in six points. First, he states that humanity is gradually getting richer in terms of income per person. Second, he highlights that because the world population will continue

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Underpopulation was an issue some time ago but with all these changes in the world, the population is increasing exponentially. Overpopulation is the issue economists, environmentalists and researchers now argue about, and they discuss the problems that it will bring in the future. In 1991, there were approximately 5.4 billon people in the world, according to the Population Reference Bureau, if our growth rate is not reduced soon, it is estimated that by the year 2050, the world’s population

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Overpopulation Overpopulation is a condition that is undesirable. Overpopulation is one of the problems that people concern it to. One of the serious countries facing this problem is China. Reports in China show that it has about 1.4 billion people in this country; it takes about one over seven people of the world population. China is the third largest land after Russia and Canada in the world.

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

Malthus, Condorcet, and Godwin: Caught Up on Immortality In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Thomas Malthus ponders a question that seemed to be on the minds of all great philosophers at the time: “whether man shall henceforth start forwards with accelerated velocity towards illimitable…improvement, or be condemned to a perpetual oscillation between happiness and misery.” Yet, while Malthus begins his quest with an attempt to provide a response to this puzzlement, the scholar seems to meander in a different direction. Rather, Malthus spends the better portion of nineteen chapters outlining various criticisms on those who had already pondered the question of illimitable improvement.

Read More
1788 Words | 8 Pages

From the early nineteenth century, the industrial revolution era in Europe, the population (demographic) growth speeds(speeded) up. In the early twentieth century, in 1900, the world population is estimated at 1.613 billion people. This is already a significant (increase, burst) speed of population growth.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

This theory postulates two fixed premises, that the capacity of food supply is finite and that human reproduction is uncontrollable without checks (Abramitzky and Braggion 2005). Malthus further developed the core theory that uncontrolled population growth always outruns nature’s ability of provision, because the former increases geometrically while the latter increases arithmetically (George 2006). Thus, Malthus concluded that it is necessary to call for preventive checks (moral restraints such as sterilisation) and positive checks (restraint through mortality by natural or human catastrophes) to control overpopulation (Gunn MacRae 2015), thereby solving the ultimate problem: the vicious circle of poverty—the more poor people, the poorer they are. First published in 1798, Malthus’s theory of population received widespread recognition by economists. His theory was integrated into the theoretical systems of economics and exerted an immediate and great impact on British social policy.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

The proponents of this theory argued that food scarcity occurs when the availability of food is less than the food necessity of the population. The primary developers of this approach were Adam Smith and Malthus who argued that famines are primarily caused by a sudden decline in food availability. They consider natural drivers as the main causes for food insecurity and analyses their influence on harvest failures and advances in prices. They are supply oriented, in this sense the Food Availability Decline theory differs from climate theory. Food availability decline theory is vulnerable to criticism because it confined on food availability at local levels instead of including assessments on food availability at aggregate or macro levels.

Read More

More about How Does Malthusian Principle Of Population Affect The Way We Live?

Related Topics

Open Document