Man In The Water Analysis

Roger Rosenblatt, a New York Times reporter, wrote “Man in the Water," an article about the sacrifice of a plane crash survivor. He was a passenger of the Air Florida flight 90 when it flew into a bridge. The man did what no other person would have done on the flight, passed the lifesaving rope to his fellow passengers. He forgot about his own needs and eventually sank into the black water of the Potomac River. Rosenblatt wrote his article because he wanted people to understand the selflessness of the human race. The continued act of love that the man in the water demonstrated the best of mankind. In his article, Rosenblatt wanted to prove that people are equal to nature. All humans have the potential to give life, like the plane crash hero. He says, “He could not make ice storms or freeze the water until it froze the blood. But he could hand life over to a stranger, and that is a power of nature too.” The powerful themes of “Man in the Water,” are love, sacrifice, and the struggle against nature.

The man in the water demonstrated love for the people he saved. A major theme in Rosenblatt’s essay is love for fellow human beings. Love is the driving power behind the world. It holds

The main in the water gave everything he had to fight nature’s wrath. Rosenblatt demonstrates the man in the water's overpowering kindness through his humanity. A major theme of Rosenblatt’s article was kindness because the man in the water was so strong. He firmly gave up life, in order to save others. You can guarantee he wasn’t just sitting in the water. He must have been encouraging others to hold one with grim tenacity. The man in the water was kind and strong. He believed in something more than himself. Therefore, Rosenblatt uses strong language to emphasize the meaning of his words and the significance of the actions portrayed. He says, "His selflessness was one reason the story held national attention; his anonymity