Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both strived to influence equality amongst the Black and white society. These Civil rights leaders fought for what they stood for in many different ways. Such as, King influenced the movement through non-violence, whereas Malcolm X wanted to react with a violent approach. These two Civil rights leader’s differences were influenced by their experiences and contrasting backgrounds. Martin was raised surrounded by a middle class family and was provided with quality education, where he later grew up to be an Baptist minister which influenced his Christian belief in using nonviolent civil disobedience in his movement. Whereas, Malcolm X grew up in an underprivileged environment jumping from foster homes with …show more content…
This speech was to influence everyone to unite and fight with oppression and violence for civil disobedience. Malcolm expresses many rhetorical appeals such as ethos, pathos, and logos. In the Beginning of the Speech, He reflects a major appeal of ethos by saying how his religious beliefs have a huge impact on what he believes in and why he’s fighting but has no correlation with the issue of black equality, “but as a Muslim minister; and I believe in action on all fronts by whatever means necessary. Although I 'm still a Muslim, I 'm not here tonight to discuss my religion. I 'm not here to try and change your religion. I 'm not here to argue or discuss anything that we differ about, because it 's time for us to submerge our differences and realize that it is best for us to first see that we have the same problem, a common problem, a problem that will make you catch hell whether you 're a Baptist, or a Methodist, or a Muslim, or a nationalist” This reflects an ethos appeal because it shows Malcolm is dedicated to making a change, despite his religion. He also expresses a pathological appeal to portray the actions of the white men against he Black society and to describe what will happen if they don’t use force or an violent approach soon. “If