ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Mlk

718 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparing and contrasting Martin Luther King and Malcolm x

Martin luther king and Malcolm X were two well known speakers. But there has

always been the same question being asked around, whose philosophy is better? Mlk is a supporter of non violence. So is Malcolm X, but his beliefs are a little different than Martin Luther King 's. Malcolm x does not like violence but he does encourage it when the other party starts the disagreement. Mlks believes if the other party has started it you do not fight or hurt them. He will protest their companies or just run away. In Martin Luther King 's word it states “This is a non violence at its peak of power, when it cuts into the profit margin of a business in order to bring about a more just distribution of jobs and opportunities for negro wage earners and consumers. Mlk both served their time in prison,but for two totally different reasons. MLK went to jail because he was protesting,Malcolm X went to jail for breaking and entering and for larceny.
I believe that martin luther king 's philosophy wa better …show more content…

He never saw a good outcome is violence,nothing good comes out of it. If you protest and don 't buy their goods or anything they will break eventually. In Martin Luther King 's own words he says “ IN the past six months simply by refusing to purchase products from companies which would not hire negroes in meaningful numbers and in all job categories, the Ministers of Chicago under SCLC’s Operation Breadbasket have increased the income of the Negro community by more than two million dollars annually”. This is a non violence at its peak of power,when it cuts into the profit margin of a business in order to bring about a more just distribution of jobs and opportunities for Negro wage earners. In these two sentences you can obviously see that by protesting and no violence Negro job distribution has gone up. Also it has increased about two million dollars. As you can see there is a completely different solution than

Show More
Related
140 Words | 1 Pages

Both Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X were born into situations where they did not know much about or interact frequently with their parents. In Frederick Douglas’ case, he was separated from his mother when he was an infant, and he only saw her a few times when he was very young (Douglas 13-14). When it comes to Douglas’ father, all he knew of him was that he was a white man who may or may not have been his master (Douglas 13). Malcolm X ’s

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King believes that nonviolence is power to fight for their freedom instead of using a weapon so they refuse the evil. “Basic to the philosophy of nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil” (Doc F). Martin Luther King refuse to buy any products from companies because he believes that power is

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

The last reason Martin Luther King Jr had a great philosophy is because of his dream for a more equal society that judged people on character and not anything

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Hearts of the oppressed will always cry out in desperation; waiting for anyone to swoop in and liberate them from their cruel reality. Few are capable of mustering up the gumption to throw their neck on the line in defense of the defenseless. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is one such man. Trading in his comfortable life for one of danger and ridicule, King was catapulted to the forefront of the Civil Rights Movement following the profound leadership he demonstrated during the Montgomery Bus Boycott. As a well-educated, African American pastor, he provided a unique perspective on the racial issues at hand.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The ability to read and write is both creative and destructive. This ability opens your eyes to the world and how beautiful it can be. It also has the potential to destroy your entire grip on reality and expose you to the actual world you live in. It imprisons you yet, releases you from your mental confinement. Some people never escape from this confinement, some do; and those who escape sometimes go on to do great things in life.

Read More
2399 Words | 10 Pages

Even after all the injustices done to the black population of the United Sates, Dr. King is calling for them to set aside violence, bitterness, and hatred. He wants them to fight for their equality peacefully. According to Dr. King, this is the best way to stop violence. One side must step up and act peacefully in order for violence to end.

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

When it came to civil rights, finding the right person to lead an entire population into freedom was a pretty important problem. The two most important leaders in the Civil Rights Movement were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, and they were respected by a large portion of the black community in America. Although, when it came the troubling issues of segregation, both of schools and in everyday activities, and the violent approach to fight racism v.s. the non violent approach, Martin Luther King Jr. was a better person to lead black americans. The first reason why black americans needed Martin Luther King Jr. over Malcolm X was MLK’s view on segregation.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

It took the military to allow nine African Americans students to enter a school in a white neighborhood. This is only one event, other events created riots, bombings, discrimination, poverty, and racism. This is why Malcolm X’s philosophy is much better for the sake of time and our nation. Malcolm X

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King’s views helped create a better environment for every race and I really think his political views and strategies were more efficient than Malcolm

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

In the Crito by Plato, Socrates argues against civil disobedience, seeing it as an unjust act. Contrasting this view, Martin Luther King argues for civil disobedience against unjust laws, and seeing it as a responsibility of citizens. Civil disobedience is the active refusal to obey certain law, commands or requests of the government. I will argue that the view of Socrates is superior to the view of Martin Luther King on the justness of civil disobedience. Using the argument against harm, I will show that even if a law is viewed as unjust, you must not repay an evil with another evil, as evident in the Crito while contrary to ideas presented by MLK.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther’s famous quotes was“ I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” I like this quote because just by reading it you can feel the way he felt when he said it. Also you can tell that the saying came from his heart. This is an example of freedom of speech, it's a right until it affects the common good of the people. Martin helped by standing up for what he believed in no matter what other people thought.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Mlk

Related Topics

Open Document