Martin Luther King's Injustice And Protest

796 Words4 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream…and this dream was to change how individuals treat each other. I will be explaining the injustice and protest, how were Judeo-Christian ethics applied, how was the injustice tied to the south, what are the four steps to King’s nonviolent campaign, how did the ideas flow from King’s Christian principles, how did King reconcile the “eye for an eye” Jewish principle with the Christian “love one another” principle, how does King’s ethical principles help defend against the charges that his protests were “untimely”, and pick a conflict in the world today and explain how King’s actions and principles might resolve the issue. The first topics are the injustice and protest, how were Judeo-Christian ethics applied, …show more content…

First example of non- Judeo-Christian ethical principle was when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat to a white man. A second example would be when the state troopers attacked the marchers and would beat them with billy clubs, whips, etc. (Martin Luther King, Jr.). Next is to name King’s four steps to nonviolence and how did these steps flow from King’s Christian ethical principles? The four steps are collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action. These steps flow from King’s ethical principles, because he is for freedom and human dignity (Curtotti, 2014). After that, how did King reconcile the “eye for an eye” Jewish ethical principle with the Christian “love one another” ethical principle of nonviolence? The first one is that nonviolence is the way of the strong. This means that nonviolence is not for the cowardly or weak individuals. The second one is the goal of nonviolence is redemption and reconciliation. This means that nonviolence doesn’t seek humiliation, but to offer friendship and understanding. The last one is that nonviolence accepts