ipl-logo

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

784 Words4 Pages

Frankenstein Report - Prompt One
Picture a deranged scientist in a laboratory. Beakers and test tubes filled with funky colored liquids. Bones and parts scattered about, and in the center of a room, sparks fly and a creature is brought to life. “It’s alive!” the creator exclaims. This is Dr. Frankenstein’s lab right? In short, it isn’t. In fact, the real story of Victor Frankenstein, and his creation is quite different. How does the original works of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley differ from its modern counterparts?
In the 1931 depiction of the original “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley; many things changed about how the general public viewed Frankenstein. The 1931 film paved the way for a differing story line that became a staple in popular culture. …show more content…

This appears to have made a mark with the public. Characteristics that are mostly left up to the imagination, I.e. bolt in the neck, Large statue, green pigmented skin; have set in the minds of readers/viewers.
In recent years, a lot of depictions of Frankenstein have been geared towards a younger demographic. With modern science it's easy to understand how any event like the creation of Frankenstein's monster is highly unlikely and scientifically inadequate. Many depictions of Frankenstein later, the image that was once of a terrifying monster is now that a fairy tale. One that could be pictured right out of a children's book, unlike it’s original counterpart that originally could be considered to be likely through modern science during its publication.
Throughout the years, “Frankenstein” has been the subject of many plays and amateur shows, which perhaps is what retains its relevance. No adaptation is the same, one imperfection in a play could change the storyline for future adaptations. Though small adaptations can influence the storyline slightly, large productions in Hollywood are to blame for the dilution of the the Frankenstein title. “...Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, does not feature mad scientists messing around with beakers in laboratories, nor does it deliver any bug-eyed assistants named Igor. Hollywood has given us those stock images...” The Birth …show more content…

For large productions in Hollywood, writers will make whatever changes needed to attain an audience, and most importantly, revenue, all of these measures can heavily alter how a viewer perceives the story. This, eventually, could end up nothing like the original text. Due to this clear dilution of the text of Frankenstein, a common misconception has been established, that the name of the Monster is “Frankenstein”, which for those who have read the original writing of Shelley, know that Frankenstein is the name of the Creator, not the

Open Document