ipl-logo

Maryland Vs Pringle Essay

627 Words3 Pages

Case Citation: Maryland v Pringle, 540 U.S. (Washington, D.C. 2003).
Parties: Maryland, Petitioner / Appellants Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee
Facts: Pringle along with two other men were stopped in the early morning for speeding. Upon the driver getting his registration out for the officer, the officer noticed a wad of money. During a search the officer seized $763 of money that was rolled up in the glove compartment, along with five baggies of cocaine. None of the three confessed to owning the drugs, to which the officer arrested all three men. In this case, the officer had probable cause to arrest the men including Pringle. Pringle waived his rights under Miranda v Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1996), [1] he gave the police a written …show more content…

[1]
Decision: In this case it was found that the officer did have probable cause to believe that the crime of possession of the cocaine was that of Pringle. Due to this the arrest did not contravene the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. So, the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Maryland was reversed, leaving the case remanded for any further proceedings and is not inconsistent with the opinion of the Court. [1]
Comment: This case shows a warrantless search and arrest based on what the officer sees with his belief that a crime is being committed or that it has been committed.
Resources:
1. Opinion of the Court, Supreme Court of The United States (2003)

Show More
Related

Chimel Vs. California Case Study

455 Words | 2 Pages

Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.

Read More

Case Study: Spinelli V. United States

519 Words | 3 Pages

With surveillance, they observe that he meet with a person, and proceed to return to Illinois, via driving. Based on the anonymous tip and the observation of said events, matching in similarity to the information provided in the letter, the law enforcement obtained a search warrant. Duing the exection of the search warrant, a massive durg load was discovered in Gates car, he was subsequently arrested. The decision of the Trial Courts, made judgement that there was no probable cause, thus invalidating the search warrant, leaving the drugs found, inadmissible to the case.

Read More

The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief

510 Words | 3 Pages

United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) Capsule Summary: Seizing a person’s luggage for an extended period until a warrant is obtained violates the Fourth Amendment as beyond the limits of a Terry stop, but, a sniff by a narcotics dog does not constitute a search for Fourth Amendment purposes. Facts: The respondent Raymond Place was stopped by Federal Agents (DEA) upon his arrival into LaGuardia Airport on a Friday afternoon. The respondent refused to consent to the search of his luggage. His luggage was seized by the agents under suspicion they contained narcotics. The respondent was informed the agents would be obtaining a search warrant from a judge.

Read More

Wendell Clayton Case Study

1593 Words | 7 Pages

The Majority of the court 's decision includes McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Deschamps, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ. The court had to decide in this case whether the seriousness of an offence or knowing that one might be a threat to public safety can be a justification to stop anyone without having solid evidence against them. The court stated that both Mr. Clayton and Mr. Farmer were guilty of carrying concealed weapons in a public place. The police had the right to search them even though their car didn’t match the description described by the 911 caller because the officers have to be consistent with their duty towards public safety and act in accordance to the seriousness of the

Read More

Case Brief Of Maryland Vs Pringle

503 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore it is not illegal to make a warrantless arrest of an individual for violating the law in a public place, in presence of an officer, as long as there is probable cause. When the three men were questioned by the officer they did not offer any information in regards to ownership of the cocaine or the money. These facts gave the Police reason to believe that all three occupants had knowledge of the cocaine and money, giving him probable cause to arrest all three of them. Later, that same morning after the arrest of the three men, Pringle waived his Miranda rights and decided to give an oral and written confession, in the confession he took ownership of the drugs, and stated that “they were on their way to a party, with the intention to distribute”. For the before mentioned facts, Pringle was found guilty of possession of a controlled

Read More

US Vs. Cummings: Case Study

177 Words | 1 Pages

1. When Stan Johnson told Trooper Cummings to come in he gave him permission to enter his home and the opportunity to begin a conversation. I do not believe that the police acted in an improper manner in this case. Stan identified himself, invited the officer into his home, and proceeced to distribute cocaine to the undercover cop. I agree with the court decision to not dismiss the case because they were able to prevent the misuse and intent to sell drugs to other people. 2.

Read More

Exclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case

475 Words | 2 Pages

The Weeks v United States case was the Supreme Court basis in determining to incorporate the Fourth Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause and apply the exclusionary rule in state cases. In this essay, I am going to discuss the reason why the Supreme Court determine that the exclusionary rule should apply to the state police activity. Prior to the case of Weeks v United States, the state police activity “were not limited in their conduct by the Fourth Amendment” (Ingram p.81) and the exclusionary rule of Fourth Amendments illegal search and seizure only applies to federal law enforcement officers. Basically, it means that state law enforcement officials can illegally search and seized criminal activity evidence and court don’t prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in the trial court.

Read More

No Probable Cause To Arrest Hayes Essay

551 Words | 3 Pages

This is a criminal case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that there was no probable cause to arrest Hayes. Hayes did not give consent to be taken to the police station and be detained plus fingerprint. Therefore, Hayed Fourth Amendment rights were violated and the conviction was overturned. Fact of the case: In the 1980’s there was a series of rape and burglary that happened in Punta Gorda Florida.

Read More

Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

In the creating of the US Constitution, the creators hit many roadblocks. It was difficult for the state delegates to decide on much, especially because they were biased and in favor of their own states. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two examples of the disagreement of representation within the states in the legislative branch. The New Jersey Plan was in favor of equal representation throughout the states. The Virginia Plan was in favor of population representation, meaning the larger states would have more representation than the smaller states.

Read More

Essay On United States Vs Virginia

701 Words | 3 Pages

The creation of the VWIL was also declared to not be an equal alternative to VMI, as it did come with the same reputation and prestige that a VMI diploma has with it. The majority opinion, written by Ginsberg, said that because VMI could not justify that their restrictions on genders and how it contributed to the education or structure of the school that it was unconstitutional to deny this right to women (U.S. v. Virginia, 1996). Justice Scalia wrote the dissenting argument in which he argued that the court’s decision was more based on strict scrutiny rather than intermediate scrutiny as it was in Craig v. Boren. By not allowing women, Virginia was facing the same dilemma as Oklahoma in Craig v. Boren when the Equal Protection Clause had been called into question when state law gave two different drinking ages for different sexes. In this 7-2 case was the first to Craig v. Boren, which stated that Oklahoma having two different drinking ages for males and females was unconstitutional as it did not provide justification as to why the genders had different standards (Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2015a).

Read More

President Eisenhower Made The Right Situation Dbq

776 Words | 4 Pages

The people of the United States can depend on the President to fulfill his duties and exercise his power correctly, and laws will be obeyed, no matter what happens. All the influence of the previous cases rolled into the importance of this case, gaining the most attention and receiving the most action to resolve

Read More

Pennsylvania Vs Deep South Essay

539 Words | 3 Pages

During the American Revolution, many states wanted to seek independence from Britain. However, Pennsylvania and the Deep South prefered to remain under British rule. Provided that Pennsylvania was a Quaker-controlled government, independence was not favored. The Deep South was largely occupied by Loyalists, colonists who remained supportive of Britain, therefore, they did not want to split from Britain. Pennsylvania and the Deep South were not necessarily interested in seeking independence.

Read More

Chesapeake Colonies Vs New England Colonies Essay

1211 Words | 5 Pages

The Revolutionary War gave reason for America’s unification, but the diversity of America made it impossible for one unified culture to emerge. By 1700, the New England and Chesapeake colonies had evolved into two distinct societies contrary to their predominantly English populations, but these differences did not happen quickly. Rather, they were the result of the colonists’ intentions during colonization, their distinct environments, and their different social and political inequalities. The New England and Chesapeake colonies began to develop into two distinct societies from their very beginnings due to the intentions of their respective colonists during colonization.

Read More

Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde Research Paper

400 Words | 2 Pages

Unit 4 Project DRAFT- Leela Curteman A theme in the novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, by Robert Louis Stevenson is the temptation of curiosity and discovery that can blind logic. Dr. Lanyon. receives a cryptic letter from his friend Dr. Jekyll, the mystery of this letter and urgency makes Lanyon feel responsible to carry it out. Lanyon retrieves the substances for Jekyll, but seeing Hyde is the person that will be receiving these substances, Lanyon withholds them. To that Hyde states, ““And now,” said he, “to settle what remains.

Read More

Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (PRA)

972 Words | 4 Pages

Issue 6- Does the Act violate the Procedural Due Process? Conclusion 1.

Read More

More about Maryland Vs Pringle Essay

Related Topics

Open Document