ipl-logo

Max Soffar's Argument Against The Death Penalty

785 Words4 Pages

The death penalty is a sentence that has no use. The process has become too slow over the years to the point where some people die before they get executed. Similar to the case of Max Soffar who may have been innocent, but died of cancer before he had the chance to fight for the freedom he may have deserved(Houston Press). This also shows that the death penalty has taken and ruined the lives of innocent people. A study shows that 4% of defendants sentenced to death penalty are innocent(The Guardian).The second reason is the high number of botched executions that happen in the USA. The only one without failed executions is the most intense one which is the firing squad. The second most successful execution is the electric chair with a fail …show more content…

They people who want the death penalty mainly say that they think that if they commit enough of a sin that God would understand the execution of that person IN the sense that the person is pure evil. The biggest problem is that the Bible says that all people should have their sins forgiven. Besides that it's shows that the real reason is so the person that can feel the pain that he victims family and friends feel. That shouldn't be a way we handle the pain we can’t remember what the person meant to use if we have the thought of death in our head. It almost cause a wall in our heads to not think straight because you are hurting more than helping the healing …show more content…

We need to fight for a better way because I feel like this process is hurting more than it is helping and until we stop this crazy idea of “justice” we can't have easier way to take away these bad people.

Works Cited

1. Ballard, Scotty. "Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?." Jet, vol. 103, no. 9, 24 Feb. 2003, p. 4. EBSCOhost,
2.Cushing, Renny and Adrianne Haslet-Davis. "Should the Death Penalty Live?." Time, vol. 185, no. 21, 08 June
3.Von Drehle, David. "Bungled Executions. Backlogged Courts. And Three More Reasons the Modern Death Penalty Is a Failed Experiment. (Cover Story)." Time, vol. 185, no. 21, 08 June 2015, p. 26. EBSCOhost,
4.Latson, Jennifer. "A Gruesome Historical Argument against the Death Penalty." Time.Com, 07 May 2015. EBSCOhost,
5.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/28/death-penalty-study-4-percent-defendants-innocent
6.https://new

Show More
Related
1434 Words | 6 Pages

Oshinsky did a remarkable job explaining the history of the death penalty in a clear and concise way. While the text was fairly short, he effectively provided his readers with well documented and relevant information on how controversial the death penalty has been throughout the past few centuries. He undertook an exceptionally important issue that many Americans do not know much about, or may have conflicting feelings

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

In his article “To Kill or Not to Kill”, Scott Turow tries to convince the audience advocating the capital-punishment system in Illinois to inspect its fairness and efficacy. He tackles this issue because he provides that the system is defective. Even though he goes back and forth from favoring the capital punishment issue to rejecting it, he clearly states his penalty opposition, supporting it with powerful examples, factual data, and a metaphor. To appear moral, credible, and knowledgeable, the author uses his scholarly tone, demonstrating his respectable position. He, as a lawyer and “one… members of a commission appointed by Governor”, had to present his position on the law during the reforms of the capital punishment system in Illinois.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

Nathanson uses his essay, Does It Matter If the Death Penalty Is Arbitrarily Administered, to combat the notion that capital punishment is an effective outcome for criminals. It is my goal to propose that capital punishment in itself is as fair outcome, and point out that it should remain established as long as the ones sentencing criminals to this fate are held to higher, more fair standards. The driving force behind Nathanson’s argument against capital punishment is statistics. While no one comes forth to outright say that race plays an important role in the decision on who receives capital punishment, there are statistical findings put forth by Bowers and Pierce state that killers of whites have the highest chance of being executed

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Support for capital punishment requires valuing retribution over rehabilitation. Those who favor capital punishment value highly the closure it provides to the families of the victims, and they believe that it deters would be murderers from killing. Retribution, closure and deterrence are the main reasons in favor of the death penalty. Opponents of capital punishment generally believe that it is hypocritical and immoral for the state

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

The University of Texas-Pan American Essay #2 Anna Salkinder LSPI July 27, 2015 The death penalty has been a major topic of debate in the United States as well as various parts of the world for numerous years. At this time, there are thirty-one states in which the death penalty is legal. Nineteen states have completely abolished it (“States with and without The Death Penalty”). Since its initial development back in the 1600’s, the death penalty has taken a different course in the way it is utilized. In its early days, the death penalty was greatly used and implemented for several offenses.

Read More
321 Words | 2 Pages

The most essential argument against the death penalty is that it is immoral. Regardless of how you look at it, the death penalty is slaughtering, and murder is never right! A further take a gander at the profound quality of the death penalty is required, on the grounds that albeit homicide is considered an ethical total, this is not generally the situation. This can be discussed through the virtue ethics theory. Virtue Ethics is the main non-defective theory of morals and was established by Aristotle.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 87(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1143970 This article was written by Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L. Akers. They both consulted experts on criminology and criminal behaviour to evaluate the effectiveness of the Death Penalty.

Read More
2017 Words | 9 Pages

Around the United States, there are substantial variations in the way people view methods of capital punishment. Some conclude it essentially violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment, while others see it as the only form of justice. But even so, this does not remove the fact that there are thirty-two U.S states that support and act upon capital punishment. In fact, there is a total of five different methods of execution authorized by most states that currently have death penalty statutes. During the course of this paper, I will be discussing each method which includes: Lethal Injection, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

In the article “Abolish the Death Penalty” written by Bill Ryan the chairman of the Death Penalty Moratorium Project presents a solution. He thinks of the death penalty as “horribly expensive, ineffective, and inefficient” (Ryan). Ryan first starts off with a cause and effect moment then continuous to state the problem and his solution. He uses certain words, statistics, and questions to entreaty the readers in order to make them be understanding towards his explanation. Ryan’s structure first uses the cause and effect format, the cause would be having the death penalty and the effect are the results of having one.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

For the last half-century one of the most controversial topics in America is capital punishment and its practice. Both sides of the argument have valid justifications for their point of views, but the issue is still at hand. Should criminals be put to death or should there be another form of harsh punishment? Ethical values play a huge role in arguing one way or another. The topic of death penalties is nothing but an open forum for citizens and politicians to debate on their opinions and values and not so much on facts.

Read More
1488 Words | 6 Pages

Evan Deason Mrs. Tollett Honors 10th Lit. 10 April 2017 People always want to say that the death penalty is horrible and that it will bring down society in some way or form, but it is not. The death penalty is needed in society today as it is put in place to attempt to decrease crime rates, Even if the ways it does it are not the best. People always argue that the death penalty is bad for morale, but the only reason people think that is because the people who go against the death penalty spread lies that the death penalty is a random lottery, which it is not, it is only reserved for the worst of crimes like planning to kill someone or murdering a police officer on duty or killing multiple people (The Pros and Cons of the death penalty).

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

It is very difficult to know the exact moral status of the death penalty, though many see it to be a degrading, barbaric, and amoral. The opponents of the death penalty argue that it causes incredible suffering and pain for the sentenced and brutalizes society as a whole where it operates. Both of these factors could have negative effects on crime and criminality. The vast majority of people would at least argue that human life is highly valuable and should be preserved, though the extent at which preservation should make-way for retribution is where things become very

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

The death sentence decisions and methods aren’t being placed in good hands, and cause humans to suffer more pain than they deserve.

Read More

More about Max Soffar's Argument Against The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document