ipl-logo

'Mercy Otis Warren, Excerpts From' Observations On The New Constitution

675 Words3 Pages

Despite the fact that excerpt 7.4, “James Madison, Excerpts from ‘Federalist NO. 51’ (1788)”, and excerpt 7.5, “Mercy Otis Warren, Excerpts from ‘Observations on the New Constitution, and the Federal and State Conventions by a Columbian Patriot’ (1788)” have their differences, there are also some similarities between the two. In the first reading, excerpt 7.4, James Madison wrote an essay to why the people of each state should ratify for the Constitution. James Madison is a federalist. Madison describes that the states would have a constitution, which would have certain laws that all states have to follow, but that they can still have some state laws of their own. The federalists want to ratify the constitution in order to have a more powerful …show more content…

Mercy Otis Warren, an antifederalist, observed the disadvantages to the constitution. She says that the government would become too powerful and that will overrule the people’s independence. Seeing that the government may become powerful, Warren proposed that the states do not want to be controlled like before with Britain. She has said that they have finally escaped a government that dictates and she does not want to return to that. Mercy Otis Warren has proposed that if the people were to ratify the constitution, they would do it even before they fully understood what they were getting into. Considering that the men who came up with the constitution did do it in secrecy, she says that they are definitely trying to do this for their own good. Warren says, “Self defence is a primary law of nature, which no subsequent law of society can abolish.” (76) In her statement she identifies that the people of each state are to control their own lives. She does not want a strong government; she wants to keep a weak government. Warren wants the people to fully understand what they are getting themselves into, so they do not regret it in the long

Show More
Related
423 Words | 2 Pages

Mrs. Mercy Otis Warren Mrs. Mercy Otis Warren was an American poet and writer who promoted the revolutionary cause. She was born on September 25, 1728 is Barnstable, Massachusetts and died on October 19, 1814 in Plymouth, Massachusetts. She was the sister of James Otis, a political activist, and married James Warren, a merchant and farmer who served in the Massachusetts state legislature, in 1754. Mercy Otis Warren was a good friend of John and Abigail Adams.

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

Silencing Warren in the eyes of some people may have been bad, but it may have also been good. The Senate voted Warren to be silenced for her refusal of obeying Rule nineteen which says Senators are prohibited “from making attacks of a personal nature.” After this occurred though, Majority Leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell, was considered a “sexsits” becuase he couldn’t “handle a strong women.” A justification McConnell has is his traditionalist views which Harry Reid “destroyed” in the chamber. Reid’s affect dismantled the process to the Senate.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

As an Anti Federalist, Warren was opposed to the idea of the new Constitution. She believed that the United States was moving towards consolidated government rather than state sovereignty. She felt that the federal government should not have complete control (Wolverton). This would be hypocritical towards one of the original ambitions of the Revolution, separating from a government that was too powerful over them. She believed that Federalists, such as John Adams, had not only lost their Revolutionary principles, but they have also begun to renounce republicanism

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist 10 was produced on November 22, 1787 and was written by James Madison. James Madison was the 4th President of The United States and is the author of the Federalist 10. Madison wrote the Federalist 10 to directly defend the ratification of the Constitution and in it he mainly focuses on factions and why we need them. Factions are groups of people with different opinions and even though they seem bad, Madison proved that we need them. In the Federalist 10 he states that there are two ways to remove faction one

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

May 1787. 55 delegates, one long, sweaty conference. The Constitutional Convention was a huge event for the United States. During this convention, the 55 delegates from all states except Rhode Island met up to change their Articles of Confederation. Instead of editing, however, the 55 delegates rewrote the whole thing into the Constitution, which is still used today.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

However this idea was eventually scrapped and they wrote a whole new constitution. This constitution would protect America from tyranny, so they could keep a civilized and united country. The Constitution that was made helped defend America from almost all types of tyranny and is still helping us hundreds of years later. One way the Constitution prevented tyranny is by supporting Federalism.

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

What motivated her was her belief that the Constitution took away their rights. In her argument she believed that the constitution weakened their liberties and that the Constitution would take away those liberties and that they gained after taking their power back from Britain and she makes this clear when she says that the constitution, “threaten to sweep away the rights for which the brave sons of America have fought with an heroism” (Warren, 156). Warren overall believed that the ratification of the Constitution went against what they worked

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

She believed that banks feared that this agency would engage in price fixing, stop innovation, and put banks out of business . Warren defends that this agency would only enlighten the consumers so that they would be aware of the risks that they were taking, so that they could make the decisions on their own behalf. In this way, the agency is not controlling the banks in anyway, and all of the objections from the opposition that were previously listed are not valid. The banking industry did not agree with this argument and viewed it as a threat to their existence and expansion of government control , so they waged a full on war with financial reform advocates in an attempt to kill the

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Judge Danforth’s motivations are based on selfish reasons and also fear of the citizens questioning the court, and the people turning on him. Him and Mary Warren both share the motivation of

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The author of anti-federalist 17# was Robert Yates (not the serial killer), at the time he was a politician and judge also the oldest of his family. he lived in the state of New York and tried to run for governor. The document yates wrote was just about states that the anti-federalists did not desire a constitution as a result of they felt that it 'd offer the central government an excessive amount of power which it 'd remove all power from the states. "to raise and support armies at pleasure, in addition in peace as in war, and their management over the militia, tend not solely to a consolidation of the govt. , however the destruction of liberty..." a stronger central government would higher shield everybody and is additional for the good

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen.

Read More

More about 'Mercy Otis Warren, Excerpts From' Observations On The New Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document