Meta Synthesis Vs Meta Analysis

1) Define the terms meta analysis and meta synthesis. Why did we use meta synthesis in the research design? Meta synthesis is a deliberate and intelligent way to deal with breaking down information over subjective investigations. It is a procedure that empowers analysts to recognize a particular research question and after that scan for, select, assess, compress, and join subjective confirmation to address the explored question. On the other hand, meta-analysis is an endeavor to lead a thorough optional examination of essential subjective discoveries. Its purpose is to give a complete depiction of a wonder and an appraisal of the impact of the strategy that is discussed.
Subjective information is generally accumulated by perception, meetings

Why did we choose this? Justify its relevance.
Content analysis is a strategy for outlining any type of object by checking different parts of its essence. This empowers a more target assessment than contrasting elements in light of the impressions of an audience. Content examination starts with distinguishing research directions and picking a unit or examinations. When picked, the content must be coded into reasonable core classes. The way towards coding is fundamentally one of specific reduction. By diminishing the content to classes comprising of a word, set of words or expressions, the researcher can concentrate on, and code for, particular words or examples that are characteristic of the examination in question.
Because of the way that it can be connected to analyze any bit of correspondence, content analysis is utilized as a part of numerous practice fields, running from showcasing and media, to writing, ethnography and social investigations, human science and political science, and numerous different fields of requests. Moreover, content analysis mirrors an association with political and psycholinguistics which assumes a vital part in the improvement of false

With respect to its Southeast Asian neighbors, China is effective and can misuse that circumstance to expand its own security with respect to that of the Philippines. The Philippines, then again, considers itself to be unsafe concerning China and with the capacity to use its resistance to seek after its own particular security and monetary interests and those of its partners that are independent of China's. In the South China Sea, the security problem is additionally convoluted by recollections of China's past unfortunate experience. It's muddled by the part history plays in approving the Chinese authority.
China, being militarily solid in the South China Sea, draws clear fire for pressuring the Philippines through its forward if not forceful stance, driven by its shortcoming of local governmental issues, an angle the Philippines does not generally consider. The danger of transformation from underneath pushed the Philippines to seek after political change. Furthermore, the unfurling position and dispute, wherever it leads, will without a doubt have significant implications long ways past China's