ipl-logo

Milgram's Experiment: How People Have Blind Obedience

610 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Experience in concentration camps essay

Milgram's experiment is about how people have blind obedience to authority it also called a shock experiment. His Experiment was created to explain some of the concentration camp horrors of the World War 2, where Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, Slavs and other enemies of the state were slaughtered by Nazis. In the holocaust, jews people were tortured because Hitler told their people to torture Jewish people, so people were following this world blindly without knowing why they are doing that. Many people claim that they were just following the orders, and could not hold to be responsible for their action.
On an experiment, 2 random people were put in a room where one is strapped in a chair that has placed an electrode on his arm. Next, the teacher …show more content…

Many people who learn about obedience research have been able to stand up to arbitrary or unjust authority. People who get to know the purpose of the experiment make them felt Betrayed, Upsetting, Traumatized, Guilty, Embarrassing, Shock, and see them questioning their Self-image. And the people who stopped and refuses to go on felt Relief, Annoyed, Proud, Satisfied, Positive. So to get rid of this feeling we can resist the pressure of authority by questioning the authority, Asking yourself “is this something that I would do on my own?”, don't follow blindly someone, if you think that it is not right, or you felt uneasy about. Always think on your own, and put yourself into others shoes to feel what other will feel.
Milgram used his experiment to bring organizational changes in our society. Changes in between Gangs - initiations, Lawyers - clients, frats - initiations, Teachers - student, employers - employees, Public officer holder - public, parents - kids. Milgram purpose of making people realize that, how nazi people felt in Holocaust by doing this sock experiment, will succeed and create awareness on people to not blindly follow authority and think before you do

Show More
Related
743 Words | 3 Pages

In the book “Opening Skinner’s Box”, Lauren Slater discusses many complicated ideas relating to certain experiments of recent times. In every chapter, she focuses on one specific experiment and poses many controversial thoughts. One of the chapters I found most interesting was the second chapter titled “Obscura”. In it she walks readers through the experiments of Stanley Milgram and questions the purpose, results, usefulness, and morality of the experiments. To begin, the purpose of the experiments seem to be off to me.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

The Milgram experiment was an experiment that tested an individual's willingness to follow the instructions of an authority figure. Subjects were told to shock a person, who they believed to also be a subject, if they answered a question wrong. The people getting shocked were actors and were not actually receiving electrical shocks. Many of the subjects continued to give high voltage shocks because they were told to. This proves that in high-stress situations people are willingly listen to authority figures despite what the say to do.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

1. In the Milgram Experiment, what keeps the subject obeying the experimenter? Why do you think some people continued? Were you surprised by the percentage of people willing to shock to the death? In the Milgram Experiment, what I believe keeps the subject obeying the experimenter is the separation between the two individuals.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

In the experiment, Milgram uses purposeful deception as the teacher is the naive subject and is told they are participating in a memory and learner psychology experiment and are in charge of delivering shocks to the learner, who, in fact, is an actor. The majority of the participants in the study were obedient to the experimenter even though the experimenter "did not threaten the subjects with punishments such as loss of income, community ostracism or jail for failure to obey. Neither could he offer incentives" (Milgram 651). Despite having nothing to gain, the subjects continued participating in the experiment. The participants continued to administer shocks to the student because they were instructed to

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

During the 1960’s Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments to test how a person reacts to authority. He started these tests in response to World War Two and the reports of the German soldiers who claimed they were “just following orders’ when asked about

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

Deception from a moral viewpoint would be something that is seen as wrong, but in a study or experiment for research I think deception is something that is necessary to gain certain knowledge that we wouldn 't be able to gain using regular methods. Usually, the ends justify the means to a deceptive experiments and they usually have good intentions behind them. Many people may be angry after the experiment is over but it is shown that people enjoy an experiment with deception more than an experiment without deception; and people also benefit from them more, educationally. I believe deception is a necessary tool for learning about human behavior and human reaction. Deceptive experiments are experiments that really make you think when the experiment

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

There are many ways to find out how individuals would react in certain situations, for example, by putting individuals in a simulation. Causing stress and discomfort to individuals in order to gain knowledge is at times necessary. For example, Stanley Milgram’s experiments which focus on obedience to authority and the extent a person is willing to ignore their own ethical beliefs and cause pain to another individual, just because he is ordered to do so. Stanley Milgram writes about his experiments and results in his article “The Perils of Obedience”. In his experiments Stanley Milgram causes subjects who have volunteered to be a part of them some stress and discomfort in order to receive relevant results.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

On day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.

Read More
1301 Words | 6 Pages

What is life after death? Since the beginning of time, many people have wondered what happens after death. I chose to read and provide a synopsis of the chapter “Life After Death” by William L. Rowe. There are four main parts discussed in the chapter: the varieties of immortality, the meaningfulness of immortality, the case for immortality, and the case against immortality. By the end of this synopsis, I will explain a better understanding of whether or not we can believe there is life after death.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

While arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

The reason of his interest was caused by a remark after the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who was on trial for war crimes committed during War World II. The remark was how Adolf Eichmann’s defense claimed he was simply following instructions when he ordered the deaths of millions of Jews. The participation to the learning of Milgram’s experiments draw many subjects with the promise of participation to be paid in the amount of $4.50. It all begins with a shock generator, and the focus is on the person who has the role of the “teacher,” the teacher watches the learner taking part in a learning memory game. The shock generator has many levels of voltage starting from 30 volts and all the way to 450 volts.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

The Milgram experiment was conducted to analyze obedience to authority figures. The experiment was conducted on men from varying ages and varying levels of education. The participants were told that they would be teaching other participants to memorize a pair of words. They believed that this was an experiment that was being conducted to measure the effect that punishment has on learning, because of this they were told they had to electric shock the learner every time that they answered a question wrong. The experiment then sought out to measure with what willingness the participants obeyed the authority figure, even when they were instructed to commit actions which they seemed uncomfortable with.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

One of the main things that Asch’s experiments teach us is that people are extremely determined to fit in with others. In the short video clip titled “Would You Fall For That - Elevator Experiment”, we learned that people conform to the majority rather than risk being alienated from a group. This experiment, in particular, tested the Asch Paradigm to see how far people go to feel like a member of the group. They tested this by means of an elevator experiment in which actors would go in an elevator and face the wrong way and the unsuspecting victims were left to decide for themselves whether or not to conform to the group or to instead do what they felt was considered normal.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

Anything is a double-edged sword and so does obedience. Obedience has many functions. Submissiveness to a authentic leader is indispensable to win a war, and also, it provides stability for a country. From another point of view, it will lead to chaos and confusions in an institution without obedience. On the contrary, submission also has some limitations.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Stanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.

Read More

More about Milgram's Experiment: How People Have Blind Obedience

Related Topics

Open Document