ipl-logo

Mitch Rapp's Rejection Of Political Rules In Extreme Measures

815 Words4 Pages

Rules, whether enforced by law or inferred by the public, are a preeminent technique for imposing order upon society. Nevertheless, people who claim that rules restrict their full capabilities despise rules. Mitch Rapp is one such person who cogitates that rules hinder his progress at extracting information from captured terrorists. In Extreme Measures by Vince Flynn, Rapp is on a mission to swiftly eliminate terroristic threats across the world, but cannot do so without controversial interrogation methods. Simultaneously, another character, Karim, organizes and trains men for a terroristic advancement on the United States. The three most important conflicts in Extreme Measures are Mitch Rapp’s refusal to abide by political rules, the animosity …show more content…

In the novel, senators explicitly inform Rapp that he must refrain from utilizing torture in his investigations. In turn, Rapp expresses his disappointment: “I’m not going to back down from this fight, Mike. I’ve had it with these…politicians…” (Flynn 37). Rapp is filled with rage at the fact that egocentric politicians who have not yet grasped a gun are restricting his successful system in the espionage field. This intensifies apprehension in the plot, as the reader wonders whether Rapp will abide the rules or keep employing his prior techniques. Indeed, it provides a multifarious number of routes for Flynn’s writing as the novel progresses. The course that the author elects will delineate Rapp’s characteristics. For example, Rapp will be depicted as obedient if Flynn compels Rapp to obey the senators. On the other hand, if Flynn sanctions Rapp to oppose the rules, then Rapp will be proved rebellious. Additionally, Rapp’s friction with the rules affects the climax of the novel. Specifically, the numerous prospects for Rapp’s decision concerning obedience to the rules will coerce variation in the climax’s …show more content…

Precisely, the conflict proves the disparities between those who do the grunt work and those who command others. Rapp, a field operative who recurrently kills enemies, conveys his disapproval of Leland, an officer at a military base: “And you have an overinflated sense of how important you are in this whole thing” (Flynn 150). The plot is affected by Leland’s false senses of authority. Indeed, Leland believes that his crisp uniform and militaristic demeanor entitle him to power over Rapp. Consequently, Rapp feels as annoyed as a dog with fleas (☺ Simile) at Leland, and he puts Leland back in his place. However, Leland feels disvalued and thinks of Rapp in a negative way. As a result, a division is created within individuals operating on the same team. This is a dangerous conflict that Flynn can use to tip the scales in favor of the antagonists, terrorists. Indeed, a mere misunderstanding between Rapp and Leland could prove deadly for the American military

Open Document