ipl-logo

Monster To Steve Harmon Essay

1517 Words7 Pages

Although humans are complicated species in terms of behavior, there are guidelines that differentiates between them and classifies them to either a good person or a monster. Turning a person from one to the latter is possible though by a sequence of events that can take a person’s life south and change him into a monster even though he was good in the beginning. Being a monster is really dependent on the perception of what you do, what you act like in the eyes of the people, and the social organizations like schools, clubs, courts, and ….etc. . It is dependent also on the perception of the person himself to his acts and what he is. That is what happened in the novel Monster to Steve Harmon who was merely a teenager at the time that was in the middle of judging a murder case which he was …show more content…

That is my definition of a monster which I think was not much different from what Steve was struggling to define as the story was progressing. But in the eyes of Sandra Petrocelli who was the prosecutor of the case, the judge, jury, and the whole legal system a person is a monster when they after a long process called a trial condemn him guilty of a crime. Their way however seems to be deficient because many people who are innocent have been put behind bars and been labeled as monster just because the evidence of them being innocent was not as clear as the legal system wants. That Is why the legal system is faulted and is often criticized because it is a state institution that makes people live jobless in poverty and blames them for crimes they commit for the sake of getting by in life. This is exactly like not blaming Dr.Frankistien for creating his creature that turned into a monster which is really wrong in my opinion. Walter Dean Myers’s Monster is an experimental novel written in the form of a film script by its main character, Steve

Show More
Related
374 Words | 2 Pages

From a death in the family to receiving a bad grade on a test, although different, every day people go through challenges. The difference between these people though, is how they choose to tackle these problems. Some choose to talk to their acquaintances, while others choose to keep it to themselves--it is just a preference. In Monster by Walter Dean Myers one of the characters is on trial for felony murder. This sixteen year old’s name is Steve Harmon and he chooses to write about his challenges.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

If you were blamed for a crime you didn’t do, would you let that accusation go and let it tarnish your reputation? Would you let it fly by and have others judge from every angle? No, right? Normally people who get accused of crimes demand justice as they know they did not commit the crime and only justice can give them the freedom they deserve. But let’s look at Steve Harmon, the main character from the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers who was on trial for murder.

Read More
201 Words | 1 Pages

Change can cause a catastrophe of the mind; some individuals handle it well while others don’t. Change can transform one’s mindset and one’s treatment of others. In Walter Dean Myers’ Monster, Steve Harmon, a somber teen, undergoes a massive change by being sentenced to prison,in addition to being on trial. Firstly, at the beginning, Steve, fearful and unsteady, struggles with his emotions.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Your Eloquence Engine Trial ends on 29 March 2018 - Subscribe to GradeProof Pro Monster Conflict Essay: Innocence vs. Guilt The definition of a “monster” is a threatening force. In Walter Dean Myers’ Monster, Steve Harmon the defendant in the trial is being charged for felony murder. The monster in him is the struggle between his innocence and guilt.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

He has check marks next to all three components that define personhood, and thus must be defined as a person with certain unalienable rights. One of the strongest counter arguments, even after this justification, may be that the Monster does several things that could be considered inhuman. However, persons do acts of inhumanity every single day–be they arson, murder, theft, or even genocide. The argument that the Monster is a primitive creature that acts out of anger is invalid, for he does no worse crimes than the general society. He may be considered a Monster on the basis of his unique origins and physical appearance, but as has been shown, he deserves the equal treatment and justice as any other person would be

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

To be accused of both “child” neglect and abuse towards the monster is unjustifiable for Victor Frankenstein. Victor Frankenstein is not guilty for the “child” neglect and abuse of the monster because the monster is not a child, he was made up of many adult human body parts, Victor only created the monster, Victor did not teach the monster to kill and because the monster is responsible for its own actions. As the one of Victor Frankenstein’s defense attorney I believe that Victor Frankenstein should be declared innocent. When Victor Frankenstein was creating the monster, he was getting body parts from any place that had body parts such as the morgue or the slaughterhouse. Calling the monster a child is wrong, since he was made up of adult

Read More
1600 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, the creation’s monstrous actions are in fact justifiable because of the psychological damages he faced from his creator’s abuse. An awful combination of the effects of child abuse cause an innocent creation to become a killer. Frankenstein is the real monster because the effect of his abuse destroys the joy of life for an innocent creation. Frankenstein’s apathetic nature also causes severe psychological damage to the

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

People are not born with the mentality to kill—or are they? Human ambition and desires vary from one another, but for the most part, humans do not seek to commit atrocities. If they do, then who is to blame, the murderer or the ones who raised the murderer? In Mary Shelley’s novel, the main character, Dr. Victor Frankenstein, stitched body parts together to create a beyond hideous, vile-looking creature which caused Frankenstein to abandon him at sight. When the monster ends up killing Frankenstein’s beloved brother due to resentment, one can argue that the creature’s actions are justified (55).

Read More
1165 Words | 5 Pages

The unjust treatment that the creature received from humankind was harsh and unreasonable as he wasn’t allowed the opportunity to prove his intentions were far from malicious. His loneliness, isolation and injustice from those he tried to befriend turned him into an actual monster, evidently his perspective and personality changed after being excluded. The monster had been treated unfairly by humanity “I desired love and fellowship and I was spurned. Was there no injustice in this? … Am I to be thought the only criminal when all human kind sinned against me?”

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

When people hear the word “monster”, most people imagine a massive, horrid, and grotesque figure that haunts people. While pondering what a monster is, mankind thinks of the outward appearance. Seldom do people think of man’s internal qualities as being barbaric or gruesome. Authors allow readers to create their own images of these terrifying beings. Frankenstein is a thought-provoking novel that empowers readers to have their own opinions about who the actual monster is and what it looks like.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines a monster as "a person of unnatural or extreme ugliness, deformity, wickedness, or cruelty. " The being is unnatural right from the very beginning; his "birth." He was not carried in his mother's womb and delivered as normal babies are. The being is solely a construction of random corpses' bodily parts sewn together and brought to life. In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, society continually regards Victor's creation as a monster, both physically and psychologically.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein brings his creation to life and has to endure the repercussions of his actions. While Victor is in fact human, the question of whether the creature or Victor is more human still stands. Humanity is demonstrated as compassionate in the book and monstrosity is the opposite. The creature is more human because of his developed personality and desire to be human. Victor, although born into a humane family, evolved into everything bad about humanity; he developed obsession, resentment, and manipulated life to conform to his idealities.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The monster is directly responsible for killing all those people, he committed those crimes. Frankenstein however, created the monster and is indirectly responsible for the murders his creation committed. While reading the story, you realise, that the creature is actually good at heart. It's the way that he is treated which makes him a monster. He was never loved by his creator, and was feared and despised by everyone who met him.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

In Shelly’s text, the Frankenstein’s abandonment of his creation causes him to revert to monstrosity. The monster himself laments this stating that his “feelings of affection…were requited by detestation and scorn” from Victor, which prompts him to seek “revenge” against him by murdering his friends and family (140). Because these acts stem from Frankenstein’s abandonment of his monster, the blame for all subsequent evils falls squarely to Victor Frankenstein. However, in the film, the monster is not made evil by abandonment so much as the accidental placement of a “criminal” brain in the creature as opposed to a “natural” one, a mistake made by Frankenstein’s bumbling assistant. By placing the blame for his monstrosity on innate, accidentally created qualities of the monster, the film absolves the blame for evil from Frankenstein.

Read More
210 Words | 1 Pages

I agree with your statement. I believe that people become monsters when they experience terrible things. For example in Grendel, he gets attacked by King Hrothgar and his men, this turning point of events is what makes Grendel a revenge seeking, blood lusting monster. People and not even monsters are born with the intention of becoming one. People that tend to let anger, sadness, etc.

Read More

More about Monster To Steve Harmon Essay

Related Topics

Open Document