ipl-logo

Moral Integrity In Plato's Apology

886 Words4 Pages

A fundamental quality of human character, moral integrity, has a big impact on how people behave and make decisions. Plato was one of the many thinkers throughout history to examine the idea of moral integrity. In the “Apology”, he portrays Socrates as a morally upright individual who is dedicated to leading a good life despite opposition and persecution throughout the conversation. With a focus on three significant facets of Socrates' character—his dedication to the truth, his humility, and his readiness to endure pain in the service of his convictions—to what extent is the subject of moral integrity in Plato's Apology significant to conveying the ideas of Plato?

One of the main tenets of Socrates' moral integrity, which permeates every …show more content…

In his response to the accusations of impiety and corrupting the young, Socrates demonstrates his dedication to the truth. Socrates only wants to engage the jurors in philosophical discussion and discover the truth, not to manipulate or convince them. He presents a sincere and modest exploration of the relevant philosophical problems rather than a polished oratorical performance. Socrates' commitment to the truth and his conviction that philosophical inquiry is a worthwhile effort in and of itself are both highlighted by his candor and authenticity in his defense. Furthermore, Socrates' dedication to the truth permeates every aspect of his life and extends beyond just his defense against the accusations. He had …show more content…

Socrates constantly presents himself as ignorant and in need of direction, despite the fact that he is known for his wisdom and intelligence. He held that only through a dialectical process, in which one participates in a back-and-forth exchange of ideas with others, could one truly come to know anything. Socrates' modesty is demonstrated by his readiness to acknowledge his own ignorance and to pick up knowledge from those with whom he interacts. He once stated: “talking a lot of other nonsense about things of which I know nothing at all” (Plato, pg. 24). This quotation perfectly captures Socrates' humility and his conviction that real wisdom does not result from conceit but rather from a readiness to learn and develop. Furthermore, Socrates' willingness to converse with others stretches to his adversaries and critics as well as those who share his viewpoints. He thought that the only way to find the truth was to have a serious and open discussion with those who had different opinions. Socrates' commitment to dialogue and belief in the value of conversing with those who differ with us are demonstrated by his willingness to converse with his accusers during his trial. He pays close attention to their arguments and respectfully refutes their presumptions in an effort to gain a deeper grasp of the problems at

Show More
Related
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Later in his argument, he asks the jury to excuse his ordinary language and rather to “consecrate your attention on whether what I say is just or not, for the excellence of a judge lies in this, as that of a speaker lies in telling the truth” (Plato 18a). By demonstrating that he does not speak with eloquence or enticement, Socrates proves to speak with honesty and plainness, which shows that he considers truth a virtue. Here he also reveals why it is so important for both a speaker and a judge to focus on the truth; in a court, both are under an oath: the speaker to be honest, and the judge to be just based on the speaker’s actions. By asking the jury to ignore the eloquence of words he uses and focus on the truthfulness of what he is saying, Socrates shows that he is confident that the facts and correctness of his argument will lead the jury to see his innocence and the slander of his accuser’s claim. However, the jury do not seem to adhere to Socrates’ plea and gives its verdict of guilty, and Meletus asks for the death penalty.

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

In the Greek literary work Apology written by Plato, Socrates was convicted for refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state, introducing new divinities and corrupting the youth. It is believed by many critics that Socrates knew he was going to be sentenced to death so, he was able to use his defense as an opportunity to clear his reputation, confront his accusers, but most significantly instruct the Athenians. He wanted them to look into themselves and seek virtue and wisdom before looking into personal interests. We notice throughout Socrates’ defense that there is a continued theme of wisdom and teaching towards the Athenians.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

While this statement is a very interesting philosophical point, and one that will be addressed later for now this paper will ask “What does that philosophical point have to do with his innocence” Socrates claims to be wise, and his basis for saying so is, paradoxically, that he did not think himself wise. This paradox faces the jurors with a decision. Is Socrates wise or a fool? If he is wise, then he is not poisoning the minds of the youth, is not being impious, and is not guilty. In either case he should be tried as innocent.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, Plato analyzes Socrates’ accounts about society, justice, and moralism. In an effort to answer two important questions—what is justice and why should we be just—Socrates engages in a dialogue with various individuals. Polemarchus and Cephalus each offer similar statements as to what they believe justice to be. Polemarchus states that justice is living up to your legal obligations: “to owe something good to their friends, never something bad” (332a). In a clever manner, Socrates refutes his friends by exposing possible contradictions within their arguments.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

Poetry is a unique art form as it usually captures the feelings of a particular individual. Therefore, two poems with the same genre and similar themes can have substantial differences. On the other hand, verses that seem different can share striking resemblances. To compare and contrast two poems, this essay example will focus on the message they carry. “The Negro Speaks of Rivers” is a poem written by Langston Hughes during the Harlem Renaissance.

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates was a greek philosopher who found himself in trouble with his fellow citizens and court for standing his grounds on his new found beliefs from his studies about philosophical virtue, justice, and truth. In “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates defended himself in trial, not with the goal of escaping the death sentence, but with the goal of doing the right thing and standing for his beliefs. With this mindset, Socrates had no intention of kissing up to the Athenians to save his life. Many will argue that Socrates’ speech was not very effective because he did not fight for his life, he just accepted the death sentence that he was punished with. In his speech he said, “But now it’s time to leave, time for me to die and for you to live.”

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

In the Apology Socrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in two ways. In the first way Socrates describes his method and

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates was a man that was in search of the truth about wisdom. However, it became more then just a search when it brought him to trail of accusations. As a philosopher Socrates was known to overdrawn ideas and to frustrate anyone he was talking to. He is always in search of a better idea and for anyone who has experienced Socrates could assume he is making up his own actualities. This becomes evident in “ Apology” written by Plato, where Socrates was brought in charges for corrupting the minds of the youth and not believing in the Gods.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates, a renowned Greek philosopher of his time, is detailed within the “Apology” to have been “corrupting the youth” in the effort to reach the people of Athens with his philosophical teachings. As a philosopher, he is someone who is concerned not with the scientific or mathematics of life but rather with the morality and soul of a person. With this, he is someone who would become a teacher to those around him of his morals and beliefs within the philosophical world. However, upon his teachings, he had eventually come to a blockade in the form of accusations against his way of thinking and what he taught during his life in Athens. This accusation ultimately led to his execution and death following his trial.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

In the reading of “Plato Apology”, Socrates’ vindicates what he values and beliefs to a jury to prove his innocence. Indeed, Miletus a poet, Anytus a craftsmen and Lycon a politician brought an oral charges against Socrates’ attested him of impiety and corrupting youth, required him to appear before the King Archon the legal

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates argued in his defense that he sought knowledge by talking with the youth in philosophical discussions, and he spoke the truth, “I have a convincing witness that I speak the truth, my poverty” (Plato 35c). which he believed was proof of his beliefs.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates attempted to make a logical argument of the accusations when he questioned his accuser, Meletus. Then, to ensure his acquittal, he tried to appeal to the emotions of the judges. While Socrates’ defense was thought provoking, his inflation of self-importance worked against him in his trial, as he failed to persuade the court of his innocent ignorance. Socrates opening statement to the court was not only to build upon his character as favorable but also to lower the character of his accusers. He stated “I know that their persuasive words almost made me forget who I was - such was the effect of

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

In Apology, Socrates faces possible execution as he stands trial in front of his fellow Athenian men. This jury of men must decide whether Socrates has acted impiously against the gods and if he has corrupted the youth of Athens. Socrates claims in his defense that he wants to live a private life, away from public affairs and teachings in Athens. He instead wants to focus on self-examination and learning truths from those in Athens through inquiry. Socrates argues that "a [man] who really fights for justice must lead a private, not a public, life if [he] is to survive for even a short time" (32a).

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

I think that it is a little ironic that Socrates, the man who was all about intellect, had an intellectual error. Socrates was a man who focused on the truth, and unfortunately he failed to realize that the truth might not be what everyone else was focused on. In relation to what I stated earlier here is some in text evidence; Socrates said “to disregard the manner of my speech- it doesn't matter how it compares- and to consider and concentrate your attention upon this one question, whether my claims are

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

His personal defense is described in works two of his students: Xenophon and Plato. Both of them wrote papers called Apology, which is the Greek word for “defense”. In this essay I used Apology by Plato as the main resource, since it contents a more full account of the trial of Socrates and his words. Despite the fact that the philosopher attempted to defend himself and explain the reasons for saying and doing the things he did, it did not do any good for his justification. On the contrary, Socrates’ words seemed to make the jury harden their hearts and condemn him.

Read More

More about Moral Integrity In Plato's Apology

Related Topics

Open Document