ipl-logo

Moral Realism Vs Moral Relativism

763 Words4 Pages

Assignment one
I will consider to highlight on moral theories for my essay, because I believe I am aspired to study about the decisions and judgments all people make. Morality is a very important branch of philosophy, because it educates humans to live a better life of thoughtfulness. Correspondingly, what I have read, it is problematic to understand or to choose a side between views I will discuss: ethical moral relativism and moral realism. In this essay, I will uniquely identify each of the interpretations of morality offers, and I will give my opinion. To start with, the definition of morality is a code of conduct or belief which is held to be authoritative in maters or good or bad. Subsequently, moral, ethical relativism and ethical realism, …show more content…

To clarify, if a culture thing doing (something) is right in their culture, then they are right according to relativism. If another culture is doing (something) is right in their culture, then they are also right according to relativism. But if both cultures interfere, and both cultures disagree with each other. Than according to relativism, neither culture is more right than the other. Therefore, relativist is being fair by saying that each culture’s idea is equally respected. That is why relativists can say there is no worldwide right or wrong, good or bad, and it depends on your own point of view or your …show more content…

Unlike relativism, moral realism does not depend on statements of an individual, society or by culture, but do have truth behind their judgments. All in all, the truth to culture, and society are objectively independent on human thoughts and beliefs, no matter what society or culture colonizes on. Therefore, like James Rachels decision, on the cultural differences of moral codes and because they are universal and independent by ones thoughts and culture, it is not relative or invalid. Next, I agree with Benedict, because he argues the position of moral relativism is appropriate when based on moral principles (Benedict

Show More
Related

Judith A Boss Analysis

308 Words | 2 Pages

As stated in the textbook, Think Critical Thinking and Logical Skills For Everyday Life by Judith A Boss, there are two primary forms of moral theories. The first of these two theories are “those that claim that morality is relative” and the second is “those that claim that morality is universal” (Boss, 279). Moral relativists states that there is no universal law or view on what is considered to be morally right and what is morally wrong (Boss 279). In contrast, a universal morality states that there are specific moral values or views that all should follow (Boss, 279). Both of these views are filled with flaws.

Read More

Moral Relativism Mary Midgley Analysis

424 Words | 2 Pages

Moral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.

Read More

What Does Albl Mean By Rationalism

315 Words | 2 Pages

Ethical relativism is the belief that there are no fixed standards of right and

Read More

William's Arguments Against Vulgar Relativism

849 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will be evaluating whether or not the following two statements are incompatible. Claim one states that “What’s morally right for someone to do is whatever people in his or her culture do.” Claim two states that “It is never morally right to interfere with what people in other cultures do. ” I will define vulgar relativism and its three propositions according to William’s “Interlude: Relativism.”

Read More

James Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative

1070 Words | 5 Pages

In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

Read More

Cultural Relativism Vs Female Circumcision

102 Words | 1 Pages

Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

Read More

Moral Relativism In Criminal Justice

709 Words | 3 Pages

In the discussion of moral objectivism and moral relativism, it is important to understand the difference, and the impact that a moral system has on the criminal justice community. The community exists to enforce the laws. Moral judgments are made with votes, and the decisions on how laws are crafted are made by elected officials. For this reason, it makes sense for the criminal justice community to separate themselves professionally from their own moral views. Moral Relativism is the view of morality, much like beauty, is relative to the person, culture, or organization.

Read More

Ethical Objectivism Vs Cultural Relativism

1091 Words | 5 Pages

To cultural relativists certain actions are wrong because society does not view them as being morally acceptable, or are correct because they fall into society’s ideal. The subjectivist believes that moral acceptability relies entirely on whether the individual approves of an action and carries it out. Both of these views of relativism are inconsistent with ethical objectivism because they believe

Read More

Moral Relativism: The Correlation Between Subjectivism, And Conventionalism

1025 Words | 5 Pages

Moral relativism is an umbrella term that carries both subjectivism and conventionalism. Subjectivism is the ability to kill a man and it be accepted because of individual moral beliefs that it is okay to do so, as to conventionalism, you would be incarcerated for most or all of your life due to the fact that society sees murder as wrong. Conventionalism takes the individuals spread beliefs onto a society level through media, networking, or culture. It creates a safety net for knowing right from wrong.

Read More

Ethical Issues In Cultural Relativism

926 Words | 4 Pages

The ethics of cultural relativism are different than traditional ethical theories mainly because cultural relativism dismisses morality. Cultural relativism is named so because the ethics of different cultures

Read More

Arguments Against Relativism

388 Words | 2 Pages

One of the strongest arguments against relativism discovered during our readings is how individuals take part in cultural traditions that appear morally wrong within one 's own beliefs (Mosser, 2013). So basically saying what may seem wrong to one person and one 's culture would not necessarily be wrong to the culture of the individual who believes that what they are doing is not wrong. A perfect example of this relativism behavior is infanticide. According to one article, it states that Eskimos "often kill perfectly normal infants, especially girls" (Rachels, 1999, para. 36). Consequently, an infant being killed in another culture across the world could very easily be permissible due to their own beliefs of controlling the ratio of females

Read More

Summary: A Defense Of Ethical Relativism

1201 Words | 5 Pages

" We treat morality like taste or aesthetic judgments person relative. This form of moral subjectivism has the sorry consequence that it makes morality a very useless concept, for, on its premises, little or no interpersonal criticism or judgment is logically

Read More

Arguments Against Cultural Relativism

1020 Words | 5 Pages

Moreover, there is no universal truth in ethics, only various cultural codes instead. On the other point of view, it has been suggested that the world should derive an objective truth in every action. This essay will argue against the existence of objective truth in

Read More

Cultural Relativism In Social Media

2321 Words | 10 Pages

In other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.

Read More

Ethical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay

2607 Words | 11 Pages

(Luco, Week 3 Notes, p.9) Cultural Relativism is simply a combination of the following three theses: 1. The only criterion of moral truth or falsehood is the moral code of a cultural group. 2. A moral claim is true, relative to a culture’s moral code, if and only if the claim is generally accepted within that cultural

Read More

More about Moral Realism Vs Moral Relativism

Related Topics

Open Document