ipl-logo

Moral Realism Vs Moral Relativism

763 Words4 Pages

Assignment one
I will consider to highlight on moral theories for my essay, because I believe I am aspired to study about the decisions and judgments all people make. Morality is a very important branch of philosophy, because it educates humans to live a better life of thoughtfulness. Correspondingly, what I have read, it is problematic to understand or to choose a side between views I will discuss: ethical moral relativism and moral realism. In this essay, I will uniquely identify each of the interpretations of morality offers, and I will give my opinion. To start with, the definition of morality is a code of conduct or belief which is held to be authoritative in maters or good or bad. Subsequently, moral, ethical relativism and ethical realism, …show more content…

To clarify, if a culture thing doing (something) is right in their culture, then they are right according to relativism. If another culture is doing (something) is right in their culture, then they are also right according to relativism. But if both cultures interfere, and both cultures disagree with each other. Than according to relativism, neither culture is more right than the other. Therefore, relativist is being fair by saying that each culture’s idea is equally respected. That is why relativists can say there is no worldwide right or wrong, good or bad, and it depends on your own point of view or your …show more content…

Unlike relativism, moral realism does not depend on statements of an individual, society or by culture, but do have truth behind their judgments. All in all, the truth to culture, and society are objectively independent on human thoughts and beliefs, no matter what society or culture colonizes on. Therefore, like James Rachels decision, on the cultural differences of moral codes and because they are universal and independent by ones thoughts and culture, it is not relative or invalid. Next, I agree with Benedict, because he argues the position of moral relativism is appropriate when based on moral principles (Benedict

Show More
Related
308 Words | 2 Pages

To better explain, moral relativism states that moral judgments are true or false, but “only relative to some particular standpoint

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Moral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

Ethical relativism is the belief that there are no fixed standards of right and

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will be evaluating whether or not the following two statements are incompatible. Claim one states that “What’s morally right for someone to do is whatever people in his or her culture do.” Claim two states that “It is never morally right to interfere with what people in other cultures do. ” I will define vulgar relativism and its three propositions according to William’s “Interlude: Relativism.”

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

This is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

To cultural relativists certain actions are wrong because society does not view them as being morally acceptable, or are correct because they fall into society’s ideal. The subjectivist believes that moral acceptability relies entirely on whether the individual approves of an action and carries it out. Both of these views of relativism are inconsistent with ethical objectivism because they believe

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Moral relativism is an umbrella term that carries both subjectivism and conventionalism. Subjectivism is the ability to kill a man and it be accepted because of individual moral beliefs that it is okay to do so, as to conventionalism, you would be incarcerated for most or all of your life due to the fact that society sees murder as wrong. Conventionalism takes the individuals spread beliefs onto a society level through media, networking, or culture. It creates a safety net for knowing right from wrong.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The ethics of cultural relativism are different than traditional ethical theories mainly because cultural relativism dismisses morality. Cultural relativism is named so because the ethics of different cultures

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

”(p.19) This shows that in the study of ethics, the study of moral relativism to be more specific, the idea of universal truth does not exist. That is to say what is perceived as “good” or “right” can vary form culture to culture, so there is no way to have one universal truth. Two major examples of cultural differences that are often cited in Support

Read More
388 Words | 2 Pages

One of the strongest arguments against relativism discovered during our readings is how individuals take part in cultural traditions that appear morally wrong within one 's own beliefs (Mosser, 2013). So basically saying what may seem wrong to one person and one 's culture would not necessarily be wrong to the culture of the individual who believes that what they are doing is not wrong. A perfect example of this relativism behavior is infanticide. According to one article, it states that Eskimos "often kill perfectly normal infants, especially girls" (Rachels, 1999, para. 36). Consequently, an infant being killed in another culture across the world could very easily be permissible due to their own beliefs of controlling the ratio of females

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

This is shown in “A Defense of Ethical Relativism” where Ruth Benedict gives examples of different circumstances. However, as shown in the example of the eskimo female newborns and male eskimos those who believe in Cultural Relativism seem to get morals, and cultural distinctions confused. These tribal people have different ways of dealing with their relatives, one being no right than the

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Every society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.

Read More
2321 Words | 10 Pages

In other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.

Read More
2607 Words | 11 Pages

(Luco, Week 3 Notes, p.9) Cultural Relativism is simply a combination of the following three theses: 1. The only criterion of moral truth or falsehood is the moral code of a cultural group. 2. A moral claim is true, relative to a culture’s moral code, if and only if the claim is generally accepted within that cultural

Read More

More about Moral Realism Vs Moral Relativism

Related Topics

Open Document