The choice of using Charlie Gordon in Daniel Keyes’ book, Flowers for Algernon, for an intelligence altering surgery was unethical and biased. The first reason that Charlie should not have been chosen for the surgery is that it left him and his life in worse condition than when before the surgery. “ I dont want Miss Kinnian to feel sorry for me. Evry body feels sorry at the factery and I dont want that eather
Algernon Essay Imagine the opportunity to triple your IQ by a simple surgery. Would you take it? Charlie had that opportunity and took it. Charlie Gordon was a 37 year old man with an IQ of 68, and eventually, 204 as a result of the surgery. Before the surgery, he was a janitor in a factory, working for low pay to minimum wage.
Charlie Gordon is a none smart, caring person, living in New York. He has a desirer to be smart and fit in with the world around him. He is 37 years old, with an IQ of 68. Two doctors get him though a surgery to make him smart. They acted un-ethically toward Charlie while going though this preacher.
The main character, Charlie Gordon the mentally retarded 32-year-old man, has the opportunity to triple his IQ of 68 by utilizing a brain operation. This operation has never been tested before, and Charlie will be the first human to go through with this experiment. Charlie decides to go through with the operation. The state that pre-surgery Charlie is in only allows him to fit in a society like a puzzle piece, but it prohibits Charlie from forming worthwhile relationships with the people around him. Most people make fun of Charlie for his lack of intelligence, while others feel sorry for him and see no clear reasons to form a meaningful friendship after the surgery.
Only Charlie, the genius, could analyze the surgery’s inherent problematic components. At this point Charlie did not regret the surgery, nevertheless he should not have been the experimental
Daniel Keyes betrays the theme that intelligence doesn’t affect who you truly are. Before the operation, Charlie has a motivated characteristic and it is still there after the operation when he was getting more intelligent. I know this because in the passage it says, “ I’ll show that mouse I can be as smart as he is (Keyes p. 352),” which shows that Charlie is motivated before the operation . The test also says, “ Miss Kinnian teaches me to spell better (Keyes p. 358),” which shows that Charlie was still motivated and still working to get smarter after the operation. Charlie is a motivated character and that doesn’t change after the operation.
However, after the surgery, Charlie finds intelligence was a nice treat but was far from an importance in life and only took him away from what truly mattered. One could believe Charlie was wrong to undergo the surgery because of the side effects that came with the surgery such as physical and emotional instability, and amnesia, the depresion it came with, and how he lost all of his friends and loved ones with his extreme intelligence. First off, one reason Charlie should not have gotten the surgery is the depression and suicidal thoughts it came with for
In the novel, Flowers of Algernon, by Daniel Keyes, Charlie Gordon, who was born with an unusually low IQ, has been chosen for an experimental surgery that researchers hope will increase his intelligence. This operation is a success and has mainly a positive effect on Charlie’s life. In the beginning of the novel, it is obvious that Charlie wanted to be smarter than his natural IQ of 68. Following the surgery, he can remember trying to make rolls at the bakery he worked at (62.) He can also read much better, “The university library is my second home now.
Have you ever wondered if experiments meant to increase people's IQ are possible? Within his novel Flowers for Algernon, the author Daniel Keyes tells the story of Charlie Gordan, a 32 year old man who has been mentally challenged since childhood. Shortly after Charlie’s 33rd birthday, he is given an operation meant to increase his IQ, and the operation is successful in boosting Charlie’s IQ. But, after obtaining his newfound IQ, Charlie starts remembering parts of his childhood, and later starts to see his mental health worsen, along with having to deal with recurring hallucinations. In his novel Flowers for Algernon the author, Daniel Keyes, uses diction and figurative language to display how inequality can drive people to cause change within
Flowers for Algernon Argumentative essay Intelligence is a valued aspect to many people, but it can be achieved in options that aren’t labeled “intelligence-altering surgery”. The doctors, Dr.Nemur and Dr. Strauss do not follow the ethics of fieldwork. They chose the wrong person, Charlie Gordon, to do the surgery on, and didn’t wait to find out that the side-effects include death. In Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, the doctors made a bad choice by choosing Charlie Gordon for the intelligence-altering surgery.
Omar Bradley spoken once that, “If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” In the 1950’s, Ray Bradbury writes a stories about how technology could change the future. Ray Bradbury is a fantasy and horror author because at a young age he was interested in adventurous and fantasy fiction books. Which connects to the story called “There Will Come Soft Rains,” by Ray Bradbury and shows the truth of technology. Hence fourth, technology has harmed society.
When the scientists performed an intelligence increasing operation on the intellectually disabled Charlie Gordon, the neglected several
Although, if Charlie did not have the surgery, he would not have had the experience of becoming super smart. Charlie would agree with me that he did not feel happy with himself that he had the surgery. He decided that he wanted to leave New York because he was so embarrassed about pulling a “Charlie Gordon.” Charlie should not have had the surgery because, before the surgery, he had the motivation to become smart, and after the surgery, he became depressed and realized that the world plus the people in it are
I dont care if it herts.” He clearly does not fully grasp the implications of the surgery. Charlie only understands the operation may hurt, missing other risks like surgical complications. Failing to understand what the surgery will do to his brain, he only knows it will make him “smart”. He cannot comprehend what smart means, only wishing to be the same as others.
How do we establish virtue? For most of us, the answer is not so easily encountered, and nuance and ambiguity persistently muddy our paths to righteousness. In The Romance of the Forest, however, Ann Radcliffe explicitly crafts her characters’ morality, inventing a limited spectrum upon which most of her characters fall. On the side of uncomplicated wholesomeness exists Adeline and the La Luc family, whose introductions inform their goodness in plain terms. Conversely, the novel’s main antagonist, the Marquis de Montalt, inhabits the side of primarily uncomplicated evil (or at least, expressing a privation of righteousness).
