ipl-logo

Mortgage Crisis Essay

388 Words2 Pages

a. Mortgage companies/ brokers The role that mortgage companies/brokers played, in the subprime mortgage crisis, is that lenders were approving subprime mortgage loans to borrowers with poor credit and a high risk of default. The consumer demand drove the housing bubble to an all-time high in the summer of 2005, which ultimately collapsed in August of 2006. Lenders saw the high demand for mortgages and increase in housing prices as a good thing because the economy was healthy. However, they were not taking into account the consumers whom they were lending to.
b. Subprime borrowers Subprime borrowers were those consumers who managed to get loans and were unable to pay it back. They had poor credit and were a high risk of default. More than 40% of loans were behind on payments or were in foreclosure. Delinquent loans rose from 1.45% to 1.55%. The majority of people who made up the subprime borrower category were irresponsible borrowers with bad credit.
c. “Money center” banks …show more content…

They also charged large fees and received high margins from these subprime mortgages, also using the mortgages as collateral for obtaining private-label mortgage-based securities. This was all a result of the pressure U.S. had on the money centered banks due to regulations that were passed. When increasing numbers of consumers defaulted on their mortgage loans, banks lost money on the loans, and so did banks in other countries. This caused banks to stop lending to each other. Soon it became tough for consumers and businesses to get credit. Among the money centered banks who played a role in the subprime mortgage crisis were JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and

Show More
Related
141 Words | 1 Pages

In Addition to maldistribution stood the credit structure of the economy, some farmers were in deep land mortgage debt, so they lowered their crop prices in order to regain credit, and because the farmers were no longer accountable for what they owed banks. Across the nation the banking system found themselves in constant trouble. In America both small and large bankers were concerned for their survival, so they began investing recklessly in stock markets and granting unwise loans. These unconscious decisions would lead a large consequence, such as families losing their life savings and their deposits became uninsured. “ More than 9,000 American banks either went bankrupt or closed their doors to avoid bankruptcy between 1930 and 1933.”Although

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

What happened to all the banks then? Well first off people had complete trust in them, that is until the stock market crashed. Banks had invested a lot of money in the stock market also. But when it crashed they lost it all and

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act gave banks the authority to underwrite. This gave both, power and great responsibility to the investment banks since they became the reps of those CDO’s (which were at core bad debts of incapable homebuyers). They did not flag the reality to their investors till the last day (final date of crash), moreover, iced it with Triple-As. They stood for service and honesty towards their clients but knowing the shallowness of the investment they only sought to insure

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

However, the recession of 2007 was affected largely by the house bubble collapsing. The financial industries had designed complex ways for people to receive lends. There was a larger risk later that neither the investors of firms

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

The rating agencies, the mortgage brokers, and the regulators were accomplices in crime, and they all have responsibility to the crisis. 1. The bankers (The rating agencies, the mortgage brokers, and the regulators were accomplices in crime.) Banks were allowed to grow to be too big to be managed. They use their political influence to get regulations and regulators that allowed them

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

During a period of tough competition between mortgage lenders for revenue and market share, and when the supply of creditworthy borrowers was limited, mortgage lenders relaxed underwriting standards and originated riskier mortgages to less creditworthy borrowers.[10] In the view of some analysts, the relatively conservative government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) policed mortgage originators and maintained relatively high underwriting standards prior to 2003. However, as market power shifted from securitizers to originators and as intense competition from private securitizers undermined GSE power, mortgage standards declined and risky loans proliferated.[10] The worst loans were originated in 2004–2007, the years of the most intense competition

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Even if the Glass Steagall Act was not repealed, this lethal financial securitization would yet be possible because of a loophole present in the Act. Even though the act prohibited integrations between investment and commercial banks, the term 'commercial bank' was very tightly defined and included only the large member banks of the Federal Reserve. This meant that the investment banks could own smaller non member banks (as subsidiaries) such as savings and loan associations who would be made to aggressively give out subprime mortgages and these mortgages later being bought by the parent investment banks to issue CDOs against. Lehman Brothers had BNC Mortgage, Merrill Lynch had First Financial

Read More
1744 Words | 7 Pages

In the new financial system lenders sold mortgages to investment banks, that gathered different mortgages and loans. The investment banks then sold the CDOs to investors. This meant that when homeowners paid their loans, the money went to investors all over the world. But CDOs were poorly constructed, and riskier loans were made by lenders. The investment banks didn’t care either, as they solely focused on maximizing their profits.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Investment bankers were purchasing lots of mortgages and created collateralized debt obligations and made these mortgages available to other investors who wanted minimum risk. But suddenly people were defaulting on their mortgage payments and this resulted in the financial crisis of 2008 known as the housing

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

The credit default swaps created a housing bubble as banks were now able to trade mortgages and offer more money at what they thought was low-risk. In “The Giant Pool of Money” we heard from some of the home owners who were getting massive mortgages. They had surprised responses as one named Clarence Nathan who made around forty-five thousand a year got a mortgage of five hundred and forty thousand. These loans/mortgages looked great for a while until banks started to run out of cash to afford taking on Credit Default Swaps.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Subprime lending is risky because clients are less likely to be able to pay back their loans. Subprime borrowers pay premium above the prime market rate in order to compensate the lender for bearing greater default risk. In addition, subprime borrowers pay higher origination and continuous costs, such as applications fees, appraisal fees, mortgage insurance payments, late fees and fines for delinquent

Read More
1606 Words | 7 Pages

As William Black coined the term “control fraud” which denotes that this savings and loan debacle was due to the fraud done by the people in power, who run those large corporations. The savings and loans institutions or thrifts were built to provide the housing facilities to the local communities. Basically they were built for single house families. Keeping this goal in mind it provided individuals with low interest loans. But by 1970s this model began to change when the interest rates started rising.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

To many historians many banks failures triggered the great depression. Since a great number of people were speculating in the stock market, when stock markets went down, it meant that everyone's investments and ability to pay back bank loans went down the drain. During this time the mentality that most banks had was the idea of depositors deposit their money in the bank and get paid interest. The bank then takes the depositor's money and then gives out loans to borrowers, and charge them a higher interest rate .The difference between what banks are getting paid by their borrowers and what the bank pays their depositors would be the money that the bank earns.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, regulators tolerated their unethical trading and mishandled it at the beginning of the crisis. They could have done more to prevent the crisis from expanding and mitigate the damage brought by it. Start with unethical traders. Years before 2008, due to the prosperity of real estate market, banks issued subprime mortgages to people with poor credit history and unable to afford the

Read More
1603 Words | 7 Pages

The financial crisis that occurred in 2007 to 2009, likewise known as the Global Financial Crisis or the Subprime Mortgage Crisis, has been considered by many economists to be the world’s worst financial crisis since the Great Depression in the 1930s. The subprime mortgage crisis started off in the United States and the trigger of the crisis was the bursting of the housing bubble which peaked in around 2005 to 2006. This led to a large decline in home prices that had caused increased levels of mortgage defaults and foreclosures. The growth of such mortgage debts industry was financed with mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO) which were greatly backed by credit worthy and reputable financial intermediaries.

Read More

More about Mortgage Crisis Essay

Related Topics

Open Document