ipl-logo

Mr. Bennett Case

539 Words3 Pages

Mavrik Sylvia 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr.Bennett should not be found guilty of the murder of Mr.Adams because there is reasonable doubt. Mr.Bennett didn’t kill Mr.Adams because Mr.Bennett always has gloves on him and if he killed Mr.Adams with Rat Poison why would Mr.Bennett have traces of rat poison on his hands the only reason he had rat poison on his hands because he touched the mug and that had rat poison in it. The strongest piece of evidence that I have is that the police noted that Mr.Adams had bad eyesight and the rat poison looked the same as the sugar, so Mr.Adams could’ve grabbed the rat poison instead of the sugar. The police noted that Alfredo was the only one with the rat poison. The police also noted that Mr.Bennett had gloves and he had traces of …show more content…

So I believe the killer is Mr. Alfredo. This evidence explains my claim because it shows that Mr. Bennett is not guilty and is innocent. And it also shows that if Mr. Bennett was the killer, then he would’ve put on his gloves and wouldn’t have any traces of rat poison on his hands. Mr.Bennett is not guilty because Mr.Alfredo is the only one with access to the rat poison. There was also a towel and soap outside, next to a water hose. So someone washed their hands to get rat poison off of their hands, and Mr. Bennett said that he was NOT outside at all. So the person who killed Mr.Adams was Mr.Alfredo. The police noted in the trial that Mr.Bennett was never outside and said that Mr.Adams had bad eyesight. Then again, the only person with rat poison was the exterminator, Mr. Alfredo. I believe he might have left the rat poison next to the sugar so Mr. Adams wouldn’t be able to see the difference and grab the rat poison and drink that instead of sugar. This evidence shows that again

Show More
Related

Eldridge V. Arms Case Essay

656 Words | 3 Pages

This only proves that Mr. Eldridge had committed the crime because according to William Warden, Mr. Eldridge and Mr. Arms were the only two people to have keys to the establishment. If Mr. Eldridge hadn’t killed Mr. Arms, why were his fingerprints on the spatula? With Mr. Eldridge’s prints being at the scene, and there being no sign of a break-in, it leads me to believe that he is the one responsible for Mr. Arms’s death. The next reason that Mr. Eldridge is guilty of Mr. Arms' murder is that he has a motive and the motive is that Mr. Eldridge had asked for a raise because his house was getting repossessed and he was in desperate need of money but was denied, leaving him to be upset. According to Mrs. Sandy Smith, Mr. David Eldridge had asked for a raise from Mr. Arms but was denied.

Read More

Ia 52801 Jury Evidence

396 Words | 2 Pages

Reese Morden 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr.Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams beyond a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt because of the evidence that Mr. Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee, and the poison that was used is only available to exterminators, there are other witnesses that aren't trustworthy.

Read More

Was David Eldridge Guilty

582 Words | 3 Pages

David went to the restaurant the morning Mr. Armes died before David was going to beg for a raise. Also, David Eldridge’s footprints were found all over the greasy floor around Mr. Armes’s body inside the Family Fun restaurant. This evidence proves my claim that David Eldridge is guilty of Mr. Armes’s murder, since David wanted to get revenge from Mr. Armes, David went to the restaurant the morning Mr. Armes died before David

Read More

Why Is Mr. Bennett Guilty

416 Words | 2 Pages

Another reason why Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty is because Mr. Alfaros prints were also found on the coffee mug, and Mr. Alfaros was an exterminator and rat poisoning was only available to exterminators. A coffee cup was on the floor near Mr. Adams, the cup had rat poison residue and Mr. Alfaros prints were found on the cup. Miss Singleton saw Mr.Alfaro pour Mr.Adams a cup of coffee before Mr. Adams went into the kitchen for his cream and sugar.

Read More

Case Charles Laverne Singleton

920 Words | 4 Pages

Treatment or Killing In 1979 Charles Laverne Singleton convicted of murder Mary Lou York, owner of a grocery store. According to Police Officer testimony at the crime scene, Mary York before die identify Charles Laverne Singleton as whom convicted the crime before she died. She died in the way to the hospital due to bleeding of her neck wound. That same year, Singleton was sentenced to death.

Read More

The Curse Of The Poisoned Pretzel Analysis

946 Words | 4 Pages

To start it all off, Manchester was a three hundred pound basebal loving, sweet treat addict with a kind heart. Unfortunately for him his brother Skidmore was an evil man who was envious, and down to no good. He gave everyone around him the creeps and that could be another reason of why other people thought he was guilty was because nobody likedf him so they wanted to accuse Skidmore. Initially, Skidmore hated Manchester and finally decided to do something about it like poisoning his pretzel because he knew he could get more than one thing from his death. One of the things that he can get is the family wealth, and another is a better feeling that your brother who everyone loved is

Read More

Why Is Mr Adams Not Guilty

538 Words | 3 Pages

The police had noted that Mr Adams had been poisoned with rat poison and that it was found in the cupboard, which was only available to exterminators. During the nice evening, Miss Singleton had seen Mr. Alfaro pour Mr. Adams a cup of coffee 5 minutes before Mr. Adams went into the kitchen and got some cream and sugar. Had Mr. Bennet committed this crime, if so, he would have had access to the type of rat poisoning on his clothes or belongings, which he only had on his hands.

Read More

To What Extent Was Mr Bennet Guilty

692 Words | 3 Pages

From these pieces of evidence, the jury will find that, Mr. Alfaro was an exterminator and was the only one that had possession of the rat poison that poisoned Mr. Bennet. Next, Mr. Alfaro was the one who poured Mr. Adams

Read More

Mr. Bennett Case

556 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of murder in the first degree because reasonable doubt exists. The prosecution may claim Mr. Bennett is guilty, but they are incorrect because there are multiple other possibilities, like Mr. Alferro’s fingerprints on the cup of coffee that Mr. Adams was drinking the night he died, and the fact that Mr. Adams also had very poor eyesight, and the rat poison that killed him was stored right by the sugar and creamer for coffee in the lounge cabinet.

Read More

Mr. Bennett's Case

471 Words | 2 Pages

The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that he had rat poison on his hands and rat poison was the cause of death for Mr. Adams. The police officer said that the only person with rat poison on them was Mr. Bennett, and Mr. Alfaro, the exterminator, should be the

Read More

Menendez Brothers Research Paper

1010 Words | 5 Pages

They were both aware about the prosecutor, David Conn, having new evidence that could maximize his penalty. The Prosecution had gotten hold of a letter about the crime that Lyle had written. They also found out

Read More

Samuel Ratchett Murder Essay

725 Words | 3 Pages

The murder of Samuel Ratchett was committed by Colonel Arbuthnot and Mary Debenham, with help from the Wagon-Lit conductor Pierre Michel, Mrs. Hubbard, Hector MacQueen, and Greta Ohlsson. First of all, there is the evidence that Poirot heard during the night, and the evidence of the crime scene itself. Poirot heard a cry during the night from Ratchett’s cabin. It was a male voice that said, “‘Ce n'est rien.

Read More

Why Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words

497 Words | 2 Pages

The associates of the Armstrongs all killed Ratchett, so they all had a cover story for no one to be blamed. There were clues found at the crime scene, the handkerchief with the initial “H” and the pipe, but both of these clues could have incriminated multiple people; but there was no actual proof. Poirot, the detective on the train, tried to substantiate who killed Ratchett, but there was no actual proof to pinpoint who killed him. “Are these people whose evidence we have taken speaking the truth or lying? We have no means of finding out – except such means as we can devise ourselves.

Read More

The Final Solution Sparknotes

1316 Words | 6 Pages

This statement is a result of Holmesian deductive that is shown through the life of Holmes. Holmesian deduction shown in the passage as the older Holmes talks to the younger inspector. Holmes uses his sheer mindpower to disregard things the police thought were important and find evidence that was relevant to the crime scene, something the inspector was unable to do. The detail of Holmes’s assumption of how the murder occurred even went as far as what was used

Read More

Descriptive Essay: Capturing Her Castle

1235 Words | 5 Pages

“Don’t fool with me ma’am, you smothered his face in chalk and cut his lip, didn’t you? Such poor attempts at hiding the true nature of his death.” “Are you insinuating that I murdered him?!” she cried in fake horror. “The sugar in his pudding must’ve come from somewhere and guess what the street sellers put in their sugar:

Read More

More about Mr. Bennett Case

Open Document