We consider the U.S. to be the melting pot of people/cultures, but Minster Trudeau claims that Canada has a higher rate of foreign-born citizens than the U.S. Harper wanted to Ban the niqab, which is a face veil that some Muslim women wear at public ceremonies. Harper hoping that the people would assimilate to their culture. It seems even in Canada that there has been a push of fear over Islam/Muslim immigrants. Minster Trudeau took the stance of embracing the Muslim immigrants that want to live in their country. He wanted his people to know that everyone can make a country great no matter what they believe
Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.
Redhead argues that Taylor does not conceptualize how this vision can be reworked and re-legitimated in response to the changing socio-cultural realities of Quebec’s diverse citizenry” (80). Charles Taylor suggests that the best way to make this dualism possible in Canada is to move beyond first-level diversity where French-Quebeckers and English Canadians can be different, but that everyone belong to Canada – having individual rights in a multicultural mosaic (Taylor, 182). Taylor suggests the next most logical step is to put second-level diversity into place where the plurality of diversity will be accepted in order for individuals to find their sense of belonging (Taylor 183). However, this idea of shared and divergent values prescribed by Taylor once again comes under fire by Mark Redhead as he notes that not all Quebeckers will associate “themselves as belonging to Canada through a certain image of Quebec as a certain type of North American francophone nation” (Redhead 79-80) but that returned to the nature of the original debate – Quebec as a distinct society and region in
Therefore, Pearson changed the negative sentiments of the French towards the rest of Canadians and vice versa into more positive ones. In addition to this, Pearson also welcomed more minority groups into Canada by establishing the world’s first race-free immigration system, which was outlined in the White Paper on Immigration of
Throughout its history, Canada has pride itself on its ability to facilitate multiculturalism. It is a place where people of diverse origins, cultures and languages can work collectively and be successful. However, in Quebec, some minority groups may feel neglected in comparison to another; hence discrimination. As a result, one of the most essential factors to reduce racial tensions is to provide equality for all. Therefore, this paper will examine the adoption, justification and criticisms of Bill 62 by the current Quebec Liberal Government.
To what extent should people recognize the many ethnicities of Canada as being different from each other, and to what extent should they attempt to integrate them into new ways of life? Premier Francois Legault would likely state that people arriving into Quebec from other ethnicities should make an effort to learn the language of Quebec people and should make an effort to fit in with those who already live there. Individuals who would agree with this statement include those who live in Quebec and wish to maintain their cultural identity among all people who live there. People who would disagree with this quote would be those who believe in multiculturalism and diversity of
The Multicultural Perspective perceives Canada as a diverse mosaic of cultures and ethnicities, each maintaining its unique identity while enriching the overarching Canadian identity. This viewpoint aligns with Canada's official policy of multiculturalism, which advocates for diversity and the preservation of cultural heritage. Conversely, the Bicultural Perspective emphasizes the dual nature of Canadian identity, stemming from the coexistence of English and French cultures, the nation's two founding nations. It portrays Canada as a country fundamentally shaped by the interaction and integration of these two distinct cultural streams. Additionally, the Indigenous Perspective highlights the significant role of Indigenous peoples in shaping Canadian
The cultural mosaic is definitely present in Canada 's society, as there has been Canadians reported of more than 200 different ethnic origins in a 2001 census. Canada feels that it is necessary to have an official document that is proposed by the government called "The Multicultural Act", where the cultural mosaic can be sustained and promoted throughout the country.
It signifies their unwavering connection to Quebec and the lifestyle of a French Canadian, which they hold dear. By placing their Québécois identity at the forefront, they prioritize preserving and promoting Quebec's distinct cultural heritage and traditions. This emphasis on their regional identity allows them to fully embrace and live the Quebecois way of life, fostering a sense of belonging and pride. While they acknowledge and take pride in their Canadian citizenship, their more substantial connection to Quebec reflects their desire to preserve their unique cultural heritage and maintain a distinct sense of identity within the broader Canadian context. This individual's perspective highlights the importance of their Quebecois identity and their commitment to maintaining and promoting their regional community and culture.
Culture is defined as behaviours, values and beliefs shared by a group of people and passed on from one generation to another. Canada is a bilingual and a multicultural country. Canada is also known as a cultural mosaic as it allows people of many cultures to coalesce into one. Immigrates are coaxed to keep their culture and teach others about their cultures. Canada was established in 1867 by British North America act.
Multiculturalism is often seen as a defining aspect of the Canadian identity and the Canadian collective society. Many Canadians feel proud of Canada’s position on multiculturalism and the government 's cultural support system. Canada adopted its first policy concerning multiculturalism in 1971. The Canadian Multiculturalism Policy of 1971 was introduced to maintain the cultural freedom of all individuals and to recognize the cultural, diverse, and ethnic groups living in the Canadian society. In 1982 multiculturalism was recognized by section 27 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
In conclusion, it can be stated that multiculturalism works better in theory than in practice. Although I may agree with Kymlicka that multiculturalism is a wonderful rhetorical question to send out to the Canadian population, I think his explanations are rather shallow as he fails to acknowledge the disadvantages and problems of multiculturalism. Canada may describe itself as multicultural, but there is a lot of work that must be done before it can be described as intercultural. For the moment, it is not clear what multicultural policy is and how it may or may not be related to diversity and oppositional cultures. Baron’s article is more in line with interculturalism which takes for granted the centrality of Canadian culture, but then works
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section fifteen clearly states “every individual is equal before and under the law … without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability” (CITE) While Canada can be viewed as representing a cultural mosaic, it
Conclusion Compared to other nations, such as its neighbour America, Canada has continuously been viewed as a more diverse, respectful, and accepting country. However, Canada is not as perfect as it is deemed. Racial discrimination exists in many parts of the country, including British Columbia. Historical acts of overt racism showcased BC as a narrow-minded province, however, the province has made immense strides in becoming more welcoming and inclusive. Nevertheless, covert racism is still prevalent in the province.
The Canadian citizenship study guide is designed to help newcomers gain a better understanding of Canada as a country, as well as the rights and freedoms of a Canadian citizen. Its main purpose is to inform the newcomer of Canada’s policies and procedures – from voting procedures to the justice system to the economy… etc., and provide the newcomer with a brief history of Canada. As stated in the study guide, “Canadian citizens enjoy many rights, but Canadians also have responsibilities. They must obey Canada’s laws and respect the rights and freedoms of others … this guide will help you prepare to become a Canadian citizen” (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2012, p.3). This then helps the prospective Canadian citizens realize what the perks and rules of being a Canadian citizen are, as well as outline the process to becoming a Canadian citizen.