Muslims After 9/11 Pros And Cons

638 Words3 Pages

Do you agree with the notion that the United States Government has seriously discriminated against Muslims in post 9/11 era? In this paper I will argue whether the United States Government has seriously discriminated against Muslims in post 9/11 era or not. On this topic, I chose to agree with the notion that yes, Muslims have been discriminated against by the United States Government especially after the events of 9/11. First, I will argue that the United States Government has implemented procedures and regulations against Muslims that violate constitutional law in response to the events of 9/11. Second, I will argue that in matters of national security, Muslims are a primary target of surveillance, investigation, and interrogations compared to …show more content…

In this first paragraph, I will argue that the procedures and regulations the United States Government has implemented against Muslims in response to the events of 9/11 violate constitutional law. To start off, Under the Fourteenth Amendment, also referred to as “the protection clause,” the definition according to CNN news in an article titled “The Bush-era Muslim registry failed. Yet the United States could be trying it again,” the article, states that the United States must treat every individual living within the United States territory in the same manners as any other in similar conditions and circumstances, including the equal protection of their rights. The fourteenth amendment also prohibits states from denying any person within its territory the equal protection of the laws. This includes the rights to freedom of speech, the rights to free travel, and religious freedom. Former President George W. Bush and his administration started a program named The National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) on 9/10/2002. According to the CNN, Attorney General John Ashcroft stated the attack of 9/11 exposed the

More about Muslims After 9/11 Pros And Cons