ipl-logo

Nature In Into The Wild

710 Words3 Pages

Humans have always had an interest in exploring the unknown. During the age of exploration european conquerors traveled overseas to colonize the New World. Whether for selfish reasons or not there has always been some reason or curiosity to escape the boundaries of society and enter an area that one should not. Jon Krakauer in his book Into the Wild tries to explain why Chris McCandless decided to exit out of a conformed society and find himself in nature. This book explains why humans are attracted to changes in their ways of life, what it provides Chris, and the realistics of nature and everything that must be faced when entering into it.
Many people get curious about what they do not know even if this means encountering risks and other uncertainties. Nature provides something that we cannot always get, a glimpse into the real world. Henry David Thoreau in Walden says “We need the …show more content…

Henry David Thoreau in Walden mentions that society is “too cheap” and hardly value the company of others and have formed certain sets of rules to deal with each other. Chris McCandless favored the works of Thoreau as many quotes of his books were highlighted next to his remains. There are essential nutrients of life within nature that one can find appealing such as the peaceful appearance and the calming environment. McCandless was pushed by his father to be something he did not want to and with all the conflict he had endured throughout his life going into the wilderness was the only solution he seemed was best for him.
Nature is always depicted as peaceful and pretty when it can also be deadly and dangerous, this is what truly makes it beautiful. A hurricane can rip through an entire country and cause mass destruction but in the end it can bring many people together. Jon Krakauer in this book does a great job of telling us how nature is not always our

Show More
Related
696 Words | 3 Pages

Chris McCandless and Henry David Thoreau were two very similar, yet very different men. Thoreau and McCandless both went into nature to experience what living off the land would be like. Chris McCandless once wrote in a letter to Ron Franz, “The very basic core of a man’s living spirit is his passion for adventure. The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun” (Krakauer 57).

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

Christopher McCandless went into the wild looking for something that is not clear, according to Jon Krakauer in his book “Into the Wild” (1996). The people he met along his journey and the actions he did, describe him as a hubristic, mentally disturbed, survivalist. But not all of this is true. Some people believe he went in the wilderness because he was tired of his parents who wanted him to be the same as them but he believed money was “shameful, corrupting, and inherently evil” (115). We have clear that one of his motivations was the love of literature, trying to follow some of the authors he idolized, London and Thoreau.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

He wanted to hide from reality from the mistakes his father made so with a surge of recklessness and erroneous optimism he went into the wild. Thoreau went into the wild for a greater purpose to live simply thinking on a higher plane, understanding the human heart, and connecting to nature. Perhaps it could be argued that McCandless lived out Thoreau’s beliefs in terms of living modestly in nature better than Thoreau because McCandless actually ventured into the wilderness rather than living outside of town, he lived in solitude rather than Thoreau who had many guests, and he risked his life to live out his philosophy. This shows the main discrepancy between Thoreau and McCandless – the planning and execution. Thoreau never advocates the need to be reckless but he escapes to the woods for inspiration and discovery.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

One of the many necessities in life is to love and be loved by another human being. Chris McCandless, Timothy Treadwell, and Henry David Thoreau separated themselves from society and did not experience the comforts of being around family. When deciding, one should consider how the outcome will affect their loved ones. Chris McCandless left his family at a young age to discover the world. Along his journey, he made some bad decisions including not bringing a map and having no supplies.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Sometimes, life can be hectic and stressful, but nature can help soothe away the pain and problems. Chris Mccandless would most likely agree to this statement, because he lived his life in the moment. The book, Into The Wild, written by Jon Krakauer helps one understand that Chris Mccandless was at peace and that he truly lived life. Mccandless grew up in a financially stable lifestyle, so he was provided with a higher education, but was not materialistic. Chris had trouble having a good relationship with his parents; once they fought, he felt misunderstood, frustrated, and unloved.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever wondered what it is like to live in the wild, and become a whole new person, or what it is like to live in the wild to find yourself? Well if you have then I recommend that you read the book titled ¨Into the wild¨ written by Jon Krakauer. In this book there is a man named Chris McCandless who left society and went into the wilderness of Alaska and cut off all contact with the outside world. He wanted to find himself, and become a better person. Some may believe that Chris went into the wild to escape a toxic relationship with his parents, but the real reason he left everything was he wanted to find himself, and he felt as if he could function without everyday things.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Chris McCandless abandoned the modern world and chose the wild because he believed that he could improve himself through living in the wild, and found the true happiness of the life. McCandless abandoned his wealthy family because of his complicated relationship with his father, and he was ashamed with his father’s adultery. Therefore, McCandless believed that human relationship was not the only thing that forms happiness, instead a man’s connection with the nature brings joy as well. He also believed the habitual lifestyle was not what people were meant to do, and people shouldn't have more possessions than what they need. For this reason, McCandless traveled with little effects.

Read More
1908 Words | 8 Pages

This is why I consider McCandless was driven to the last frontier of Alaska and many of us sense that we must voyage to Yellow Stone or the Grand Canyon to have a true nature experience. Approaching his death, Chris realizes that he truly cannot live without society and people. This exhibits the boundaries of the frontier ideology and rather than establishing a connection between nature and humanity it makes it impossible to have one. In showing us this extrication, we can see the problems that the frontier ideology creates and generates constraints to the environment we protect and

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

There’s a place in the world that they feed bull sharks, because when they do for the sharks they do not have to hunt. When they are full they do not hurt people. Bull sharks are just looking for food, and when they are fed they are really cool animals. Bull sharks are cool animals, here are some facts. They are fond all around the world, and they are found near shore lines.

Read More
1240 Words | 5 Pages

Many people who go into nature always see it as something beautiful and aesthetic, but they never see the other side to nature. Humankind’s connection with nature isn’t a real one. They always look at the bright side of nature but are blind to the true dark side of nature. JB MacKinnon’s article “False Idyll” (2012), reveals that nature is not just flowers in a field but can also be the survival of the fittest. He backs up his claim by talking about nature through anecdotes and expert’s research.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

As evident by this quotation by Thoreau, his motives purely consist of living in the idealistic states of nature rather than that of “civilization”. Thoreau also stated, “I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life…”- (taken from Henry David Thoreau’s “Walden”). Thoreau, in this statement shows that he is completely self reliant in the sense that he alone went out to nature to reap what he could and survive by his merits alone, sustaining himself only on what nature had to offer. While conversely McCandless could only survive with a

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Their perspectives of nature, however, are vastly different due to their circumstances regarding companionship and affection from companions. Victor Frankenstein describes nature as calming and it brings him great happiness when he is surrounded by nature because he himself is happy and adored by friends who surround him. Frankenstein has friends whom he holds strong bonds with where “harmony was the soul of [their] companionship, and the diversity and contrast that subsided [their] characters drew [them] nearer together” (29, Chapter 2). He is surrounded by companions that give him plenty of love and affection that in turn, bring him happiness and a favoring outlook on nature. Victor takes pleasure in wandering through various scenes of nature, feeling accepted by it, therefore, he can portray it as full of life and “awful and majestic” (82, Chapter 10).

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

Nature is easily projected onto, as it allows for a sense of peacefulness and escapism. Due to its ability to evoke an emotional reaction from the masses, many writers have glorified it through various methods, including describing its endless beauty and utilizing it as a symbol for spirituality. Along with authors, artists also show great respect and admiration for nature through paintings of grandiose landscapes. These tributes disseminate a fixed interpretation of the natural world, one full of meaning and other worldly connections. In “Against Nature,” Joyce Carol Oates strips away this guise given to the environment and replaces it with a harsher reality.

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

What really drove Chris McCandless into the wild? I believe the top three of the countless reasons that drove McCandless into the wild was the emotional damage from his parents, rebellion of the youth & risk taking tendencies, and his hubris and detestation against authority and/or someone telling him what to do. Some may believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild because of his literary heroes Leo Tolstoy, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau , and Jack London but the real reason he left everything was because of those reasons. In this essay I will elaborate on why I believe those are the reasons that drove McCandless into the wild.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

At the same time, nature as a teacher teaches man to accept all the changes in life. It also motivates man. In the world of literature nature plays a very role to set the mood of the text. The creative artist uses nature to reveal both comic and tragic aspects of human life. Nature itself acts as one the most dominating characters in text which exercises its powerful impression upon the character.

Read More

More about Nature In Into The Wild

Related Topics

Open Document