ipl-logo

Nature Of Capitalism Analysis

1779 Words8 Pages

Introduction
The Nature of Capitalism
The Capitalist system has been interpreted throughout the years as either, “moral, immoral or amoral”, depending on the various thinkers whom had associated themselves to a particular understanding of capitalism (Bassiry & Jones, 1993).Capitalism in its most basic sense, allows for, “commodity production, in which there is private ownership and/or control of the means of production”, in accordance with the Politics Oxford dictionary (McLean & McMillan, 2009).
Throughout history, Capitalism had undergone several phases before reaching the concept of what the notion is understood at present, or otherwise recognised as the “Stages of Capitalist Development”, and how the concept has shifted over time (Albritton, …show more content…

Critiques of capitalism throughout the years has involved common aspects associated to the art of capitalism, such as: the exploitation if labour, mass materialism (mass production), unequal dispersal of resources as well as environmental deprivation (Bassiry & Jones, 1993).
A critique of capitalism and therefore capitalistic ways, Hirschman emphasises, is not only the self-destructing effects along with it, but that capitalism is too, “weak to play the progressive role [that] history has supposedly assigned to it” (Hirschman, 1986). Albert Hirschman elaborates on how morals within society are affected by ideologies such as capitalism and commerce. Capitalism is said to carry, “the seed of its own destruction”, as in connection to what Karl Marx would critique about the notion of Capitalism.
The Nature of …show more content…

Hirschman’s (economist) writings within, “Rival Views of Market Society”, Hirschman evidently explains the rise of Capitalism coming out of the French Revolution during the nineteenth century (Hirschman, 1986), where the idea for the ‘perfecting’ of social order was seen during the French Enlightenment (seventeenth century). Capitalism came through with a bang into society, via the process of, “a perfectible society”, where it was structured, “in the guise of powerful critiques of the social and economic order”, thus defining capitalism (Hirschman, 1986). Market society takes on various definitions, such that a market society can either be interpreted as a ‘Free Market’, as initiated through Adam Smith’s writing, or as a ‘State Market’, where the market is controlled by the state, unlike that of a free market society. Hirschman introduces market society as the way in which markets are incorporated/influenced in all aspects of a person’s life. Market society consists of four similar yet contradictory theses known as the: Doux-Commerce Thesis, The Self-Destruction Thesis, and The Eclipse of the Doux-commerce thesis as well as The Feudal-Shackles Thesis. All origins of all four theses had derived from its “country of truth”, the country in which the theory was applied at that particular time (Hirschman,

Show More
Related
1406 Words | 6 Pages

During the post-Civil War period, an era commonly referred to as the Gilded Age, the United States faced a rapid expansion of industrialization and simultaneous economic growth. Despite the comprehensive surge of economic production, this period was also an era of abject poverty and inequality as wealth became highly concentrated. The development of industry was driven by a small number of capitalists who have been portrayed as either ingenious and industrious leaders who transformed the American economy, or as avaricious and callous businessmen who would neglect the conditions of his/her workers and competitors to accumulate wealth. The labeling of such capitalists as either captains of industry or robber barons, or both, purely mirrors the

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Extensive research was taken to write this novel, and was revealed in the offbeat telling of historical events. Instead of focusing on how capitalism developed in specific countries, Appleby told the story of how it developed over time and globally. She describes the positives and the negatives with equal tact, and makes it interesting for those who usually are not interested in these types of novels. While it may be difficult to understand the connection in some sections, the unique angle is enough to capture almost anyone’s attention. Altogether, the book clearly explains why capitalism is “A relentless revolution, yes, but not a mindless one” (Appleby

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

"The golden gleam of the gilded surface hides the cheapness of the metal underneath.” This remark by Mark Twain, an renown social commentator, sums up the corruption that concerned many during the 19th century (“Exhibitions”). It is estimated that one percent of the population had possession of 88 percent of the nation’s assets (Brinkley 477). Many felt their rights as a citizen of a republic were endangered because so few people controlled such power and money (Brinkley 472). People were concerned that the robber barons were using that power to control the prices to their own personal benefit (Brinkley 476).

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Capitalism and democracy Some historians, such as Charles Sellers and Nancy Cott, label the period following the war of 1812 as a Market Revolution. Whether the historian labels the period as such or not, all agree on the economic, social, and innovative changes and developments that occurred during this era. However, historians disagree on the positive or negative effects that took place because of these changes. Charles Sellers argues that this “Market Revolution,” called so because it introduced capitalism and other drastic changes, served only to strip the small farmers or businesses of any advantages and give it to the large corporations. Or in Jill Lepore’s words, “made the poor poorer; the middle-class smug, pious, and bourgeois;

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

This essay will attempt to analyze and discuss the ways tycoons and corporations could be exploitative without government intervention. One of the main ways capitalism could be seen as exploitative

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

He thought “Irresistible energy and efficiency of harmony and cooperation” could help the society move forward and create benefits for the work force, but the government will still regulate and guide them to public interest (Clements 9). Even though there could still be some people who still try to take advantage for their own personal gain. Capitalists try to maximize as much of their profit without taking into account the

Read More
1194 Words | 5 Pages

Political economics can play a large role into understanding a society. The relationship between economics, institutional development and the relationship with laws and regulation, one can better identify utopian and dystopian societies. In the short story Harrison Bergeron, by Kurt Vonnegut, there is a direct relationship between the theme of governmental power and the state of society. The relationship between the political economic statuses of a society and governmental power is one way to determine if a society is a utopia, dystopia. By focusing in analyzing the laws and regulation and its impact economically, one can come to the conclusion that the text, the society of Harrison Bergeron, is a depiction of a totalitarian society.

Read More
2901 Words | 12 Pages

Very few books in the history of economic thought still render an accurate portrayal of society today. Written 115 years ago, Thorstein Veblen’s The Theory of the Social Class (1899) describes a materialistic society obsessed with reputation and social status, echoing a portrayal of the modern capitalistic consumer culture that defines us today. As Roger Mason (1998), professor of consumer theory states: “Consuming for status has, in fact, become a defining element of the new consumer societies” (p.vii). In his treatise, Veblen’s discusses such a society, in order to portray the ‘leisure class’, the 19th century society that characterized the upper class that formed as a consequence of the Second Industrial Revolution. Such a society uses the consumption of goods and leisure as means of climbing up the social ladder.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Area of Conflict Homelessness can be understood in the perspective of conflict theory, which holds that capitalism is one the main reason for homelessness. “Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned”, (Ayn Rand). There are many reasons why a person becomes homeless, an increasing number become homeless each year, with up to 5,000 people becoming homeless every year. Generally the experiences that lead to homelessness are determined by poverty and structural inequality.

Read More
2521 Words | 11 Pages

Capitalism is a highly dynamic system which brought immense material wealth to the human society. This essay traces the historical dynamism of capitalism from its minority status to its majority status in term of demand and supply of investment capital. The emergence of capitalism as a mode of production out of pre-capitalist mode of production was fully formed by the mid-nineteenth century (Hobsbawn, Age of Capital: 1848-1875) this in no way implies that it was quantitatively dominant mode of production.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Capitalism is understood to be the “economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” In modern society, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has become so integrated that it has resulted in a change in the relationships individuals have with other members of society and the materials within society. As a society, we have become alienated from other members of society and the materials that have become necessary to regulate ourselves within it, often materials that we ourselves, play a role in producing. Capitalism has resulted in a re-organization of societies, a more specialized and highly segmented division of labour one which maintains the status quo in society by alienating the individual. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim theorize on how power is embodied within society and how it affects the individuals of society.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Capitalism and Socialism are types of systems throughout the world in different societies that have had their successful periods of time, but did not show to have the same success at other times during the course of history. Socialism’s theoretical essence says that ownership of property should be in the government’s hands meaning that government has more rights in the assets than individuals do while Capitalism gives to the individuals the right of property, creating a better society since the individuals can produce and purchase as they need to. Capitalism is the political and economic system where land, factories, companies, etc. are owned privately to produce profit for those who own them. Prices of services and goods vary from the costumer’s

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

It provides capital for economic development and encourages global expansion by compressing the world into a single space (Robertson and Khondker, 1998). This in turn delivers political stability (Miller, 2001), and as is seen in China, improves living conditions and educational opportunity for more people (Chun, 2013). Competition often drives technological innovation, and online debates has pointed interest towards capitalism in providing the impetus for democratisation through the creation of a middle class that demands civil liberties (Bailey, 2007). Furthermore, where individual liberties are prioritised, individuals are able to develop hobbies and activities that allow them to travel, create and explore, which arguably fosters the control over one’s environment that Marx believed to be natural. Hence, capitalism could possibly reduce alienation, although this can be considered to ultimately be a form of false

Read More
1433 Words | 6 Pages

Liberal Dream The liberal dream camp show that with virtues and ethics of markets, cooperation, freedom, and fostering creativity that markets are good and make people do good things. These organizations force people in a positive way to make choices to be economically sound but also good people. This idea can be seen in the quote, “Markets, then, not only produce economic harmony (the satisfaction of individuals’ desires and needs), they also create social harmony,” (Forcade and Healy 2007:287). This can be seen with how businesses have to interact with consumers to stay in-business.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx’s legacy in social theory does not lie in his predictions of future utopias but it rather lies in his analyses of the contradictions, as well as the workings, of capitalism. Within contemporary sociology, this tradition is very much alive in world-systems analysis, it is a perspective that has been developed by Immanuel Wallerstein in the 1970’s. The Modern World-Systems (MWS) theory is a macroscale and multidisciplinary approach to world history, as well as, social change. The MWS theory emphasizes the world system, as opposed to nation states, as the primary unit of social analysis, but it is not the sole unit of social analysis. According to Wallerstein, the modern nation state lies in a broad political, economic and legal framework

Read More

More about Nature Of Capitalism Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document