ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Should We Maintain Zoos?

1000 Words4 Pages

In every country, we can find a zoo easily. People could see whatever they want to see in the zoo and visitors who visit the zoo hangover in the zoo with making the loud noise. They act like this because they think they are safe thank to the fence which lock up the wild animals to the visitors. In these inhumane situation, There are taut confrontation of opinions in the world since zoos were built. Of course, zoo has positive effects in that it can give educational effects and happy memory to human. However, is it right to manage zoo if animals have the animal rights like human rights which make human can do whatever they want. Although some people insist that we should have to maintain the zoo, we have to prohibit the zoo in order to protect …show more content…

But it is just stereotype that we have to protect all the animals when they are in danger. Website The DEBATE.org states that "Everything will eventually starve to death if we allow everything to live. Then w 'ere REALLY monsters as humans. Look at Yellowstone. There are many examples of the negative consequences of over protection - we almost made certain trees extinct when we protected them from fire. Many examples. Its a bad idea. Just let nature do its thing." (‘Should We Protect Endangered Species?’) . In making this comment, opposition to remaining the zoo argues that humans don’t have to remain the zoo in order to protect the endangered animal. They said we just wait and see how they survive from the ever-changing environment. Moreover, they insist that "we should not protect endangered species. There are already many species that have become extinct, either because their habitat was destroyed, a food supply ceased to exist, or they were hunted to extinction. No amount of laws and watchdogs can guarantee that a species will survive. As mankind and civilization spread out over the world, more animals will be become extinct. It is not realistic to think we can protect them all." (‘Should We Protect Endangered Species?’) . Whatever we do we can’t save all the animals which is in danger and this just grow the stereotype that animals in under human’s

Show More
Related
975 Words | 4 Pages

Gopnik creates an argument about the problems of American history and its truthfulness. Specifically the Revolutionary War, he enlightens the truths of the violence and gore of the time period. Using characters like the Whigs and the Patriots he sheds light on the true story. As America moves forward throughout history he argues the importance of stop glorifying what truly was a horror. Contrasting Gopnik

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

Have you ever heard the deafening trumpet of an elephant or witnessed the quick and sudden turns of a cheetah? These natural wonders are merely a fraction of the countless species that compose the complex web of life on Earth. However, the continued presence of these creatures is becoming increasingly jeopardized, as human activities like habitat destruction and poaching are carried out. Enter the wildlife protection community, a network of passionate individuals who devote their efforts to preserving endangered species and their associated habitats. The wildlife protection community is a committed group of individuals who recognize the importance of conserving these creatures and their natural surroundings in order to maintain biodiversity,

Read More
1736 Words | 7 Pages

People such as animal activists go against zoos and aquariums and try to show the problems with zoos and aquariums. Some of the issues they bring up about these places is that it is inhumane to keep these animals

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

One case of this being shown is when children see what is happening to these animals it very much hurts their views on life and societies actions. For example an article written by Jenson E. states, “It is hardly surprising to learn that most children visiting zoos are neither empowered nor educated by the experience of seeing captive wild animals so far removed from their natural habitat. Zoos present an entirely false view of both the animals themselves, and of the real and very urgent issues facing many species in their natural homes. This new research appears to confirm what we have said for many years. Zoos do not educate nor do they empower or inspire children to become conservationists”(Jenson E.).

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

Zoos Should Be Banned Imagine you are five years old, someone breaks into your home, kills your aunt and possibly your older brother in the process of kidnapping you. You are separated from your loved ones, leaving your mother in severe pain and grief. You are taken somewhere unknown, imprisoned in a cell where people come watch you for their own entertainment.

Read More
1834 Words | 8 Pages

This argument is split into three main viewpoints, the opinion that zoos harm animals, the opinion that zoos save endangered species, and a mix between the two. Viewpoint number three is more of a critique how zoos are good places where bad things happen and should be reformed. Each option has its own individual pros and cons but a reform of zoos and their standards would be the most economical for zoos and aquariums and this method would also be the least harmful and less stressful for the animals involved. The care and wellbeing of the animals involved should be the number one priority of all groups and by cutting back on over breeding, the phasing out of lager animals that naturally roam large distances, and creating environments that’s sole purpose is to educate people, zoos can become a better place for people and animals

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

This explains that animals have a small chance of going back to the wild. To add on to that, Some zoos don’t provide the things that animals animals need. A bear starved to death at the Toledo Zoo after zoo officials lock her up to hibernate without food or water (Baker). This piece of evidence means that zoos sometimes don’t give animals the things that they need. There should not be zoos because they treat animal

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

The question of the necessity of zoos is extremely controversial nowadays. There are many people who advocate for replacing them with sanctuaries as they believe money spent on keeping wild animals captive might have been used for conserving them in wild. Others are concerned that zoos serve not only for people's pleasure but for preserving and keeping populations that otherwise would go extinct. There are sufficient arguments for both points of view, expressed in various articles that are dedicated to the significant topic. “Do elephants belong in zoos?” by Jeffrey P. Cohn and “Eight reasons why zoos are good for conservation” by James Borrell are the examples of such articles.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Zoos have always been something that families love and kids look forward to going to. Kids learn about the animals and the habitats and enjoy the entertainment. It is a great experience for people, but not for the animals. Zoos are downright cruel to Animals. Animals our forced to live in an unreal stressful, and boring conditions.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Zoos are places where animals are put on displays and where they have to live their entire life. People can visit zoos for money and watch animals like they are in some kind of television show or commercial program what is done for people only. People have to notice that zoos are not people entertainment. It is seems like animals in zoos should be free and live in wildlife where they belong.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

Oh no you have just been shot by a tranquilizer dart and you 're put in a truck and you never see your friends and family ever again. Well that 's what happens when animals go to zoos. Zoos are harmful to animals. To begin with, Animals aren 't getting the right diet when they live in zoos. Also, animals are not getting the right amount of space.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

To start, Zoos make animals in confinement hurt each other. According to Spanishzoos.org animals hurt each other. when they are in confinement together. This is bad because if the animals hurt each other they could kill each other or severely injure each other. animals even get ill because of zoos.(Spanishzoos.org).

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Humans are the cause for almost all of the animals who have gone extinct, but yet other people don’t want to help save them? From 1970 to 2012 our animal population has dropped by 58%. That my friends is why we need wildlife conservations. Think of all the animals being poached, such as tigers, rhinos, and whales and then tell me you don’t feel bad, because you don’t want to save them. People who argue against conservations, saying they don’t work are full of crap.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

This leads to many concerns from the public on the physical and mental impacts of captivity on the wild animals. This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of zoos to lead us to a possible conclusion whether it is ethical to place animals in captivity. We will also examine if zoos have the best possible facilities to keep animals in captivity. Body One of the advantages of having zoos, is to provide protection to some animals that are endangered.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine you are taken from your home, mother, and environment to a small cage where everybody is looking at you, taking pictures, and having fun. Your owners sell you to a bad zoo where all animals only get food sometimes and the bare cages are cold because you’re getting too expensive to feed and even take care of. This is why I take the position that zoos should be banned because they can cause Animal cruelty, Too expensive, and finding new homes. Say no to zoos!

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Should We Maintain Zoos?

Related Topics

Open Document