"Canada is a country built against any common, geographic, historic or cultural sense" (P. Trudeau). In Neil Bissoondath’s “No Place Like Home” and the Canadian Government’s Policy on Multiculturalism, there are strikingly opposing views on multiculturalism in Canada. The policy protects the individual’s rights, to their culture, race, ethnicity, religion and any other means of what defines someone as an individual. As a nation that is renowned for its liberal stance on multiculturalism, I believe that it is a policy that defines us as a country, that welcomes people from every walk of life. However, multiculturalism is a difficult idea to understand and define. Trudeau’s comment paints a picture of the logical fallacies in the multiculturalism policy as a whole that are described by Bissoondath. If we are built against a common sense of any kind, how will we achieve a culture that is truly Canadian? This cause and effect idea implies that by continually promoting multiculturalism, we are suppressing the Canadian identity. How will we balance on the tightrope of being a …show more content…
The language used in the policy also has isolating qualities, allowing people “to identify with their specific group or not (CIC).” This logical fallacy made me rethink my view on multiculturalism. Of course, everyone is entitled to their views and opinions, the multiculturalism act ensures that, but in this case Bissoondath misconstrues what the Act is saying. Exactly how people can take countless interpretations on what the Bible implies, Bissoondath views the Multiculturalism Act as a backwards step towards multiculturalism. Bissoondath argues that we should try not to sequester ourselves into defined groups, but rather unequivocally identify everyone as just