For many years now history has been shown from one perspective, the winning side. For Example, Neither Wolf nor Dog by Kent Nerburn discusses the hardship the Native Americans suffered during the westward expansion. Most people only know it through the U.S. government’s view and not the people affected by it. The book gives a first-hand story about what happened and how the Native Americans felt about the movement. When reading the book, many people find something different about what they learned and see that looking through both perspectives will help them understand what actually happened. Although people believe that history should be shown from the winning side, it is better to show multiple perspectives, if not it can cause false …show more content…
According to Neither Wolf Nor Dog, it states, “‘I see a lack of concern for the land you claim to revere,’ - ‘ You mean, you see a bunch of shit, right?’ - His candor was liberating. ‘Yes,’” (Nerburn 75). As shown most white people only see Natives as people who keep junk, but if the perspective was shown from both sides people would see its part of their culture. In comparison, it hides how people actually are. “‘See, it never bothered me about the way those movies made Indians look. But it bothered me about the way they made us look to white people - like a bunch of savages who just rode around faster than hell on horseback shouting and hollering. Made white people treat us bad,’” (Nerburn 86). This illustrates that false things about Native Americans were shown even though they are good people that were just trying to protect their …show more content…
A reason for motivation from a side can be because they weren’t listened to. “ ‘ The worst thing is that you never even listened to us. You came into our land and took it away and didn’t even listen to us when we tried to explain. You made promises and you broke every one. First, you said we could have our sacred lands, but then when you wanted them you took them. That is what happened with the black hills,’” (Nerburn 49-50). This clearly reveals that the Natives didn’t have anyone listen to them and were lied to. Most people don’t know about this because it was only shown through one side and not the other. Similarly, Native Americans were forced to change their lives. “Then later you tried to divide our land up and give us little pieces, you tried to make us have last names and marriage certificates, like we were white people,” (Nerburn 272). Undoubtedly, the U.S. was trying to change the way the Natives lived and
One of Washington’s goals was to have Native Americans “gradually, over the course of the very next century, become assimilated as full-fledged American citizens,”(Ellis 54). However, Native Americans were not granted citizenship until 1924, long after both the McGillivray Moment and Chief Joseph’s Surrender. Although the Creek nation chiefs in the McGillivray Moment were seen as a sign of hope, and treated with respect, “celebrated, feted, honored, and ‘speechified’ by local officials eager to acknowledge their passing presence,”(Ellis 52), they were still seen as the lesser race--Native Americans. White settlers refused to recognize them as citizens of the United States, regardless of the fact that they were here first. The Nez Perce Indians in Chief Joseph’s Surrender were, of course, treated with less respect, but were still not seen as fellow citizens.
In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
Native Americans have been thrown under the buss many a times by the United States. A lot of that comes from the way we our knowledge of them was framed to fit our needs rather than theirs. Cynthia-Lou Coleman’s piece “A War of Words” talks about how news stories frame their information to help or hurt one side or the other. The “Conflict Frames” section, is the best put together, and has strong evidence and examples to support the reasoning. The “Progress Frames” section was very one sided, and didn’t offer much information about the Native American side to the story.
The US government wanted the indians to take come into “white ways”. Chief Luther Standing Bear tells his experience after leaving the reservation. He explains how he unexpectedly learned the ways of the white man instead of his original idea of doing a “brave deed”. Also, in Powell’s report, he pushes for Native children to be put into schools to learn english and american ways to work. He pushed for houses to be built to encourage indians to convert to american traditions and ways of life.
The whites forgot to fulfill their ends of the deal with the Native Americans, but if the whites asked the Native Americans for help they never
(Baigell, 3) The clashes between Natives and settlers and enormous consequences, including bloodshed, the forced removal of Natives from their lands, and the establishment of settler dominance. (John P, 6) This exploring of history in a made-up story gave good understanding of how things that happened and the relationships between the groups changed what each group thought over many years. By following the stories of specific people across many generations, readers could really understand in a deep and human way the difficult, long-going conflict that lasted for centuries.
Throughout the past few weeks not only have I studied several different government policies and agencies created for Native Americans, but I have also studied a text that provides several interesting ideas and concepts regarding the United States treaties, policies, and, regulations with Native American individuals, tribes, and reservations. The book that I studied and reviewed for this quiz is Custer Died for Your Sins by Vine Deloria, Jr. This text is able to not only discuss several different policies for various Native American tribes, but it also provides information regarding different white people’s ideas about Native American culture. In this write up we will be able to see a little of Vine Deloria’s background and biases, the information he provides, and the scope of the text’s monograph.
The people of today should not be held responsible for the mistreatment of past American Indians, but the frustration American Indian’s feel about their mistreatment of the past is valid. The past attempted genocide of American Indians including the elimination of many American Indians a main point of frustration for American Indians and the main question still stands today: why? The discrimination the American Indian genocide started and the forced movement from the American Indians original land to reservations proves the ignorance of America’s past and the ignorance it brought with it because people today still stereotype American Indians but it's important to diminish those stereotypes. Ignorance, stereotypes and greed are the underlining causes for the attempted genocide and discrimination of the American Indians and its crucial that this topic still be discussed to get rid of the idea of genocide and
Native Americans flourished in North America, but over time white settlers came and started invading their territory. Native Americans were constantly being thrown and pushed off their land. Sorrowfully this continued as the Americans looked for new opportunities and land in the West. When the whites came to the west, it changed the Native American’s lives forever. The Native Americans had to adapt to the whites, which was difficult for them.
Merrell’s article proves the point that the lives of the Native Americans drastically changed just as the Europeans had. In order to survive, the Native Americans and Europeans had to work for the greater good. Throughout the article, these ideas are explained in more detail and uncover that the Indians were put into a new world just as the Europeans were, whether they wanted change or
Even today, movies and cartoons that depict Native Americans in any way are most often being portrayed in the same fashion as they have been for hundreds of years: through the eyes of the earliest white settlers. When Disney’s Pocahontas came out, the brutal song “Savages!” devastated Native American children.
Losing one’s cultural knowledge, and therefore the reality of their culture, allows others to have control over their collective and individual consciousness as well as their destiny. In this case, it is clear that the United States government has had the dominant relationship over the Native
Throughout history, there have been many literary studies that focused on the culture and traditions of Native Americans. Native writers have worked painstakingly on tribal histories, and their works have made us realize that we have not learned the full story of the Native American tribes. Deborah Miranda has written a collective tribal memoir, “Bad Indians”, drawing on ancestral memory that revealed aspects of an indigenous worldview and contributed to update our understanding of the mission system, settler colonialism and histories of American Indians about how they underwent cruel violence and exploitation. Her memoir successfully addressed past grievances of colonialism and also recognized and honored indigenous knowledge and identity.
In Life Among the Piutes, sarah winnemucca hopkins describes what happens when soldiers came to their reservation based off what white settlers tell the government. The most shocking instance of this happened when Winnemucca encountered a group of soldier who told her the white settlers accused the natives of stealing cattle, “the soldiers rode up to their [meaning the Piute’s] encampment and fired into it, and killed almost all the people that were there… after the soldiers had killed but all bur some little children and babies… the soldiers took them too… and set the camp on fire and threw them into the flames to see them burned alive”(78). This is an abhorrent act that is unthinkable in a functioning society. The natives had done nothing but want to hold some shred of land from the settlers who had taken everything from them and are exterminated like vermin. This was something that stayed hidden from many white settlers because of its barbarism and by exposing it Winnemucca truly educates the reader, past and present, on how natives are
Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.