ipl-logo

Nietzsche Vs Sartre

1625 Words7 Pages

Starting on the foundation that God does not exist, both Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean Paul Sartre agree that affirming this premise results with consequences on our ethical values. Sartre himself even said “God does not exist and we have to face all the consequences of this.” But although they are unified in this regard, the philosophers differ significantly on how they think one ought to act. To understand their differences in how they approach existentialist ethics, an outline of what both are retaliating against--the ethical system of Christianity--is necessary to elucidate why exactly they diverge. Beginning with Nietzsche, throughout his works he proclaims his despise of the moral structure left over from centuries of Christendom. Even …show more content…

They both argue that when God is removed from the picture, what is left is a world in which one can create meaning and make choices by defining themselves through what they want to be instead of discovering how they are through a relationship with God. However, it is important to note that this distinction is what precisely makes these existentialist thinkers not nihilists. Although they do believe the world is inherently void of meaning prescribed by God or otherwise, Nietzsche and Sartre do not think that giving meaning to the world is impossible. They just underscore that it is formed and created by individuals through experience instead of existing a …show more content…

God does not exist, and when accepted as such, it is senseless to play by the old rules of the old game. Nietzsche writes in Twilight of the Idols, “When you give up Christian Faith, you pull the rug out from under your right of Christian morality as well....Christianity is a system, a carefully considered, integrated view of things. If you break off a main tenet...you smash the whole system along with it.. For Nietzsche, the humanist creed “good without God” or Sartre’s belief that when one makes a choice, one is imposing that choice for all people is no different. To consider the universal, e.g. what would be good for all people, is only Christian morality masquerading as freedom. In the end, Nietzsche’s observation that Christianity has a ruthless hold on Western thinking proves to be true, and can even be spotted in the writings of existentialists like Sartre in the 20th century. Living without God and Christian morality is extremely difficult and takes plenty of courage, but, as Nietzsche would argue, no other way of life is more worth living for the amount of liberty and creativity it can

Show More
Related
463 Words | 2 Pages

In the book, Grendel many theories were introduced. These theories were introduced because of the author, John Gardner, who wanted to go through the main ideas of Western Civilization and because Gardner wanted to relate the book to faith and reason. The theories that Gardner introduced were existentialism, nihilism, anarchy, and modernism. Although the theory that was constantly used by many of the characters was nihilism. Nihilism is a theory that moral principles and beliefs are meaningless and that life is useless and meaningless.

Read More
100 Words | 1 Pages

In the article “God and Morality” by Caroline Wilkerson, Wilkerson questions whether or not one’s ethics are independent of religion, pondering if it is just a man man-made concept focused on goals like survival and reproduction. Wilkerson attempts to explain that the moral codes that a particular religious god encourages others to follow may be in fact “arbitrary” based on her reading of Plato’s dialog Euthyphro. In the end, she concludes by saying that even though a god’s moral code may be “erratic,” it is better to follow their moral code rather than following what society considers to be

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

Louise M. Antony argues an important ethical concern in her article, “Good minus God”. Can a person do good deeds without God? Arguing from an atheistic point of view, Antony believes that a person does not need to depend on God in order to complete good deeds. I agree, whether Christian or Atheist, all can perform good deeds, but who ultimately defines good versus evil? Antony subjectively defines morality and uses nature as her source.

Read More
1356 Words | 6 Pages

Despite that, I know that I’m taking the better “wager” by believing in God. I know this for the reasons stated previously, plus when compared to the alternative, it makes more sense. Who would want to burn forever? The benefits of one are superior to the other, and the consequences are far more severe than the other. This is what Pascal was referring to and I support that belief and ‘’’wager’’ as

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

This is so because it becomes difficult to know whether moral goodness is independent of the will of God or if it is as a result of His will. The Euthyphro dilemma offers two intensely differing sides. On one side of the argument, theorists are of the opinion that morality is whatever God wills. This position then brings into question the goodness of God’s will if His command vindicates what is wrong. Arguing that goodness is the determined by God shows that what is rights is so because God wills it to be right.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Although Sartre agrees with Dostoevsky who says, “If God does not exist, then everything would be possible,” he tries to pull back from nihilism by saying that each human must act “for all humanity” and before the audience of all of humanity. Sartre claims that all humans have no nature or essence, he disqualifies himself from calling them “all humans.” First Sartre affirms that human beings lack a nature, but if we lack a nature, then the term “human being” has no reference at all. The descriptive term that applies to something with inherent qualities and do what is required of the qualities can be identified as “human being”.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

In this essay I will argue against the previously mentioned statement using the following arguments: The inconsistency between theists, the dependence of morality on religion and finally, Euthyphro’s dilemma. One problem with the Divine Command Theory is that it assumes that all its followers agree on what

Read More
1478 Words | 6 Pages

Nietzsche was a German Philosopher who wrote a book called Twilight of the Idols. I will be taking some of his main points from his story and giving my standpoint on them. In my paper I will be explaining Nietzsche's morality as an anti-nature and his four great errors of human nature. The four great errors include confusing cause and consequence, false causality, imaginary causes, and free will. Nietzsche believed that philosophy should be about jumping from one extreme to another extreme and that it should make you angry and ask questions.

Read More
294 Words | 2 Pages

Nietzsche would be suspicious of more traditional conceptions of freedom because he would recognize that freedom can be defined by who is in power. He states that “It is much more the case that the "good people" themselves, that is, the noble, powerful, higher-ranking and higher-thinking people felt and set themselves and their actions up as good, that is to say, of the first rank, in contrast to everything low, low-minded, common, and vulgar” (3). If freedom is considered as being part of the “good,” then its definition can also change depending on the form of morality it is defined by. If a person following slave morality believes that freedom is found in God, Nietzsche would argue that they are not free. In fact, Nietzsche would argue that

Read More
1719 Words | 7 Pages

Christianity has always been subjective and ambiguous, which allows for theories and speculation to develop regarding the religion’s values and characteristics. A key matter in theology seeks to understand those values and to identify a model of living that guides people away from corruption to remain in God’s image. Athanasius of Alexandria’s On the Incarnation and Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Anti-Christ address this issue with viewpoints that directly contradict each other. Athanasius examines the Incarnation to defend his position that natural human desires corrupt mankind and suggests there is nothing to prevent evil and sin other than God’s salvation while Nietzsche asserts that corruption occurs from a loss of instinctive nature and proposes

Read More
1197 Words | 5 Pages

The voices of history and tradition are present in quite a few of Jean-Paul Sartre’s pieces. Jean-Paul Sartre, born Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartre, was a very complex man. In the 1940’s, Sartre served in the military during World War II. The war heavily influenced Sartre, causing him to relate many of his pieces to his experiences in World War II. Sartre was a French philosopher, and was a major contributor to existentialism - the 20th century way of thinking.

Read More
1411 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will focus on Merleau-Ponty’s account of our relations with Others, as well as its relation to Sartre’s philosophy and how effective of a critique Merleau-Ponty offers to the Sartrean understanding of our relationship to the Other. Throughout the essay i shall refer to the relationship between the Individual and the Other, this is simply to mean the relationship found between the ‘I’ and the other humans they interact with who have questionable similarity to the ‘I’. Our relationship to Others is a significant area of discussion because it opens the problem of Other Minds, which entails the idea that I, as an individual, cannot verify that any other individual I interact with is conscious in the same way I am. Both Sartre and Merleau-Ponty

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

Critics of Religion Midterm 2. Although Friedrich Nietzsche’s ideas and work have long been associated with atheism and even the antisemitism that would eventually lead to the Holocaust, I think a slightly more fitting description of his point of view in The Genealogy of Morals might be “anticlerical”. While I believe there are good arguments that can be made for both atheism and anticlericalism, Nietzsche seems to focus most of his energy on critiquing religious clergy such as priests as well as organized religion and its impact on morality, rather than critiquing belief in God. The first essay includes an etymology of the words “good” and “bad” and how they underwent a transvaluation at some point due to religious clergy, which ultimately lead to a morality system that he argues is not natural or innate within us.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

"If a temple is to be erected, a temple must be destroyed!" Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) is one of humanity's most influential and amaranthine thinkers. He was a German philosopher, political critic, philologist, writer, and poet. Some of his most famous works include Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1891), Beyond Good and Evil (1886), The Gay Science (1882), The Birth of Tragedy (1872), Twilight of the Idols (1889), The Will to Power (1901), etc. His impact isn't just on recently found scholarly insight, but additionally on the way numerous contemporary Western philosophers approach "life".

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The argument Jean-Paul Sartre, a French philosopher, presents on existentialism helps to prove the foundation which is “existence precedes essence”. Existentialism is normally understood as an ideology that involves evaluating existence itself and the way humans find themselves existing currently in the world. For the phrase existence precedes essence, existence’s etymology is exsistere or to stand out while the term Essence means “being” or “to be” therefore the fundamental of existentialism, literally means to stand out comes before being. This can be taken into many different ideas such as individuals having to take responsibility for their own actions and that in Sartre’s case the individual is the sole judge of his or her own actions. According to him, “men is condemned to be free,” therefore “the destiny of man is placed within himself.”

Read More

More about Nietzsche Vs Sartre

Related Topics

Open Document