ipl-logo

Nietzsche's Philosophy: Discussion Questions

1227 Words5 Pages

PHL100-701 Name:___Paul Ridgeway________
Midterm Exam
Due (in D2L drop-box): 10.26.15, 11:59pm

Section 1
Multiple Choice – 2 points apiece

1) In Plato’s Meno, while attempting to account for the possibility of acquiring knowledge, Socrates makes which one of the following claims about the human ‘soul’? (A)

a. The human ‘soul’ is immortal, and will re reincarnated when the body dies.

b. The human ‘soul’ passes away with the body. Immortality is a fantasy.

c. There is really only one ‘soul’, and each human is merely a part of it.

d. The individual natures of each human ‘soul’ determine who will be virtuous and who will be vicious.

2) Which of the following best summarizes the famous paradox concerning the possibility of knowledge described in Plato’s Meno? (B)

a) It seems impossible to have any real knowledge, …show more content…

What would knowledge be for these two philosophers, and what is the human being’s relationship to it? How do their positions differ, and what, if anything, do they have in common? Include at least two passages from the relevant texts to illustrate your conclusions.

Descartes and Nietzsche

Descartes: I think therefore I am
Nietzsche: I am therefore I think

Well, Descartes' conclusion came after he was doubting everything he knew in order to reach the ultimate knowledge which he can't doubt no more. He noticed while he was doubting everything including his own knowledge, he was doubting. In order to doubt, you need to think, and henceforth he came to the knowledge that he was looking for which is in order to Doubt you need to think. That "breakthrough" was convinced him that the proof of his existence was the fact he was a thinking entity. Thus: I think therefore I am. Descartes' mistake was he used this fact for a bigger target which is his attempt to prove the existence of

Show More
Related
745 Words | 3 Pages

In response to the long-standing philosophical question of immorality, many philosophers have posited the soul criterion, which asserts the soul constitutes personal identity and survives physical death. In The Myth of the Soul, Clarence Darrow rejects the existence of the soul in his case against the notion of immortality and an afterlife. His primary argument against the soul criterion is that no good explanation exists for how a soul enters a body, or when its beginning might occur. (Darrow 43) After first explicating Darrow 's view, I will present what I believe is its greatest shortcoming, an inconsistent use of the term soul, and argue that this weakness impacts the overall strength of his argument.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

Anish Yonjan Philosophy 1301-73426 Prof. Marcos Arandia Feb. 19, 2017 Explain and evaluate Socrates' claim in the Apology that "the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being," and briefly analyze and discuss the particular method he uses to discover the truth (i.e., dialectics or the Socratic Method), using at least two examples from Plato's Euthyphro and/or Apology. Do you agree that a human being cannot live a fully satisfying life if he or she remains ignorant, like the slavish prisoners in Plato's cave? Why or why not? In the Plato’s Apology, Socrates claims that the “unexamined life is not worth living for a human being”.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

At the end of Book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates attempts to persuade Thrasymachus that the just lead a happier and more flourishing life than the unjust (354a). He argues that justice is the virtue of the soul, which allows the soul to perform its ergon, or function, with excellence. Because the soul’s function is to live, justice allows the soul to live with excellence. In this paper, I shall present and critically examine Socrates’ reasoning behind this conclusion. The argument subtly commits the fallacy of equivocation because the term function is ambiguous.

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

Plato claims that the soul is immortal because of his argument of Opposites, to which I agree. Socrates says, “For all things that come to be… [come] from their opposites if they have such...” and “…those that have an opposite must…come to be from their opposite and from nowhere else.” (70e) Socrates argues the opposites of Bigness and Smallness. For something to be considered big, it must have first been smaller, and for something to be considered small, it must have come from being big.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, he explains the soul and comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal. Through describing the last hours of Socrates life before his execution, he lays out three arguments in support of the idea that while the body may cease to exist the soul cannot perish. In this paper, I will explicate Socrates three arguments for the immortality of the soul and their objections. Then I will argue on the presupposition of the Law of Conservation of Mass, that the universe, entailing the soul, must be cyclical. The Law of Conservation of Mass

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

However, the number three cannot ever be even for it holds a natural form of oddity that cannot be changed, the same is found with immortality. A soul cannot admit to death, which is the opposite of its essence immortality just as the number three cannot admit to being even. Leading to Plato’s conclusion of how a soul then must have to retreat, connecting back to Socrates believing death is best characterized by the soul separating from

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

Additionally, since physical senses are inaccurate and deceiving, philosophical search for knowledge is more effective when the soul is "most by itself." this point holds more clearly in the objects of philosophical knowledge that Plato later on in the dialogue (103e) refers to as “Forms.” They are mentioned Here maybe for the first time in Plato 's discussion: the Just itself, the Beautiful and the Good; Bigness, Health, and Strength; and “in a word, the reality of all other things, that which each of them essentially is” (65d). They are better approaching not only in a mental sense but with pure thoughts. These parties have been re-disputed by Simmias and Cebes and are discussed more deeply

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

In the passage 81d (2002), Socrates describes a phenomenon where the human soul is ultimately immortal despite the perishable nature of the body. The immortality of soul means that the soul has learned everything that needs to be learned in its previous incarnations. So, the process which humans call learning, is in reality a step towards recollecting what the soul already knows. This disarms both horns of the dilemma because firstly, the idea of recollection suggests you do know everything in your soul and all you need to do is uncover them through reason. This means, you can rediscover things you perceive as unknown through inquiry and logic.

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

“How successful is Plato’s doctrine of anamnesis in undermining Ancient materialism?” Throughout Plato’s “Meno” and “Phaedo” dialogues, the philosopher presents his readers with the doctrine of anamnesis, a psychological theory which undermines ancient materialism. Plato’s theory states hat man discovers in his own memory, knowledge which he previously acquired during previous incarnations of the soul, such as; values whose objects can not be material and basic universal ideas, as well as the concept that the soul is immortal. The theory supports the idea of the transgression of souls and pre existence.

Read More
136 Words | 1 Pages

References; 1. Pecorino, P.A. (2000), Chapter 2: The Greeks- Socrates Legacy, An Introduction to Philosophy, Accessed: September 9, 2013 from http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%202%20GREEKS/Socrates_L

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

In the Republic, Plato gives an argument saying the soul is immortal. In this paper I will present his argument and show that his argument is invalid. I will show why the conclusion is not true and restate the argument to make it valid to help with Socrates’ claim. Plato’s argument on why the soul is immortal: 1. Something can only be destroyed by the thing that is bad for it.

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

Meno brings forth the an argument of nature versus nurture. The goal of this dialogue is to understand whether virtue is learned through society or if those who are virtuous are born with this quality. Socrates presents his response through a serious of questions, followed by the realizations of Meno and the falsification of premises leading to the conclusion. Throughout the dialogue, Socrates makes the claim that virtue cannot be learned. He begins by arguing that there are no teachers of virtue, and if there are no teachers of virtue, there cannot be learners of virtue.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Plato and Phadeo doesn 't give work to the meaning of connection in the soul and the right type of life. Which if gives an warning against the soul contamination with sense and pleasure by the temptations. Plato states that the nature idealize a descriptive way that gives Phadeo to take to literary have an attention to the moral massage in ones soul.

Read More
1619 Words | 7 Pages

Socrates successfully exhibits that knowledge is required before one can achieve further knowledge. Socrates establishes the reasons why Theaetetus’ definitions of knowledge are incorrect. Knowledge is not perception because each individual man cannot be the objective measure of everything, and a constant flux contradicts the notion of relativism because one cannot measure something that is in constant flux. Knowledge

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

Depending on the level of goodness and purity the soul participated in during the life of the physical body, the soul enters a new being which can go from an ant (if one has led a life of evil), or a human again,

Read More

More about Nietzsche's Philosophy: Discussion Questions

Related Topics

Open Document