Nineteen Eighty-Four, 1984, is a dystopian novel written by English author George Orwell and published in 1949. It is one of the great classic books that leave the reader thinking about the concepts of life and society as a whole. The book presents a world divided into three superpowers known as Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia. These three superstates are engaged in an air-tight, never ending war in an attempt for world dominance which would never be achieved. Despite their geographical and cultural differences, the three superpowers share the same philosophies of controlling and manipulating their nations. The war is a complicated game consisting of endless maneuvers, betrayals and constant changing alliances between each side. However, the …show more content…
The Party wants power for its own sake and by any means no matter how cruel and inhuman they are. The Party doesn’t recognize family as a concept and only demands loyalty towards the Party. The elite control everything including past, present, and future. History is manipulated, documents are fabricated and human identities are removed if necessary. Some may ask what the end goal is. The answer is complicated and worthwhile consideration. Power is good for achieving ideas, reaching people, making money, influencing or controlling others. Leaders strive for power, but many maybe haven’t thought of the reason behind their ambitions. “Power by itself is nothing if one doesn’t know how to use it properly. Leaders can also become “intoxicated” by power – engaging in wrong behaviour simply because they can get away with it” (Riggio, 2009). Power brings responsibilities and moral duty to take the right courses of action. With the wrong mindset, power could be destructive and may only result in negative action. Having a constructive mindset, on the other hand, could lead to many good deeds that move humanity forward. In 1984, the Party achieves its purposes by using fear, oppression, and physical torture, but without these factors the Party would have no power. Achieving power is not respectable by itself before looking at the means it has been