ipl-logo

Norman Cousins Arguments Against Euthanasia

1157 Words5 Pages

To Die Or To Not Die
“Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside of us as we live” stated Norman Cousins (“Brainy Quotes” 1). Many cultures have strong viewpoints on suicide, but even stronger beliefs on euthanasia. Euthanasia is the merciful killing of a terminally ill patient in relentless pain. It is illegal in most countries, however some do permit it. Euthanasia is mainly for those with long term cancer and who were in car accidents that left them paralyzed. Citizens around the world should be aware of the pros and cons of euthanasia and where it is accepted. Despite the United States and Australia that think to kill oneself is disgraceful and neglects the medical field, others like the Netherlands …show more content…

To begin, Australia and the U.S do not support euthanasia. In these cultures it is believed to be morally wrong. A human being should never kill another human being, even if they are allowed to do so. Both of these countries are big believers in medicine and have been making medical discoveries for centuries. To take part in euthanasia would be as if one is abandoning the medical profession, which both Australia and the U.S. strongly promote (“Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide” 23). Doctors are here to help people, not for someone to judge their own health. “If the current generation of medical professionals makes this a possibility, it would change the very character of the practice of medicine. The physician would no longer be purely a healer but would be an executioner as well” (Orr 6). Doctors encouraging euthanasia could unintentionally affects one’s health. Patients who would never consider it, would feel uncomfortable and scared knowing they could get persuade to do so. Euthanasia would no doubt wreak the sacred bond between doctor and patient. “Human life must be respected regardless of age, gender race, religion, social status or potential success. Life is good in and of itself, not just …show more content…

These cultures believe choosing whether or not to take one’s life is part of our human rights, so it should be our choice and our choice alone. No one wants to be a burden when they grow old or diagnosed with a disease that would make them dependent on family and friends (Orr 8). For those who get to a point where they can’t eat without help or walk without assistance to them dying is a much better option than being incapable of doing the little things in life. There’s more than one case where an accident occurs to an independent well respected human being. To those people having someone always there to do normal everyday things would be an insult to who they are as a person. It would be living a completely different life that is not suited for them. Most times euthanasia is described as a selfish decision, however Belgium and the Netherlands believes it helps make them in control of their own lives, something everyone should be guaranteed. Another point to consider is when a critically injured animal is in pain and suffering there is no thought other than to put it out of it’s misery. Belgium and the Netherlands believe the same should be said for humans (Orr 12). No one wants to live just to live, but get nothing out of it. Sitting in a bed all day barely eating and breathing is not living. It’s just the bare minimum to survive. When a person has no chance of improvement, and everyday causes them pain, they

Show More
Related
1436 Words | 6 Pages

“The ethics of euthanasia have been a contentious issue since the beginning of medicine. The Hippocratic Oath takes a strong stand against euthanasia, requiring doctors to pledge never to “give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor…make a suggestion to this effect” (Emanuel and Joffe). The oath directly states no to give a patient or to suggest giving them the deadly drug. From this statement it shows that even during the conception of the oath that euthanasia was a frowned upon practice. This is a vital part towards euthanasia’s legality along with its ethicality.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

Euthanasia is simply ethically and morally wrong. It ultimately denounces medicine and is the ultimate harm that can be done to another life. In addition to this, there would be significant ramifications for palliative care, which has been outsourced to companies around Australia. Palliative care is a specialised medical care for people who have serious illnesses, and they mainly focus on providing an escape from the stress and symptoms of serious illnesses. Palliative care is costly and would most likely be crippled from legalising euthanasia and would also reduce the number of people willing to specialise in this field.

Read More
2342 Words | 10 Pages

Although these are the only states and countries that have legalized Euthanasia and PAS, many countries have not expressed why they support it or not. It will only take a matter of time until other countries join in this movement. Many people resort to the choice of life or death when they are overcome with struggles in their life such as pain and disability. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is an unethical way to deal with life and it should not be legal because it contradicts the Hippocratic

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

By allowing doctors to be part of euthanasia signifies a rejection of the importance and value of human life. Supporters of euthanasia claim that it is already determined permissible to take human life under certain circumstances such as self-defense - but they miss the point that when someone kills in self-defense they are saving the life of an innocent person - either their own or someone else's. When euthanasia is performed there is no one being saved – there is only life that is being taken. Many who believe in euthanasia say that it is a means to avoid pain and suffering, but we have to remind

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia, commonly referred to as mercy killing, is the exercise of ending lives of those with terminal conditions or agonizing pain. The practice of euthanasia is permitted in certain places such as the Netherlands, Belgium, and some parts of Canada. Although some view Euthanasia as wrong and unethical, others believe that it is a natural right every person is born with. Therefore, Euthanasia should be legalized for those ailing with little hope because the quality of a patient’s life diminishes, it could be a welcoming relief for families, and a patient has the right to die. As patients go through extensive care, like advanced medical support and artificial nutrients, their quality of life changes.

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

Dr. Christof Hufeland wrote in 1806 that ‘The physician should and may do nothing but preserve the life.’ Anti-euthanasia doctors in contemporary society follow this same code as they believe that a doctor’s only role is to care for the patient and no more; they should not intervene with moral issues such as if their life is precious or

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia has become more and more accepted in society and it needs to be fought against in the United States. Euthanasia is the process in where a doctor helps patients that have wished to die due to illnesses or physical well being. This action devalues life, prevents natural death and there are ways now to treat illnesses that we encounter. Euthanasia is not a very common thing for people to do but it is still used to help take their own life. The act is also very frowned upon in the medical field because of how it goes against the medical ethics that doctors learn to follow and go by in their work.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Euthanasia is a process where humans or animals go to the Doctor and are killed/put down. The condition that they are in is so terrible that they feel the only solution is death. Euthanasia is only legal in seven states, Hawaii, Vermont, California, Washington D.C, Colorado, Washington, and Oregon. I don’t agree with the reasons why people are Euthanized. Euthanasia is wrong because it weakens the sanctity of life.

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

Euthanasia or mercy killing both have the same meaning, which is stop the patient who will not recuperate from torment by using medical tools which are painless. Originally, euthanasia is a combination of two Greek words: “Eu” meaning “good”, and “ thanatos” meaning” death”, which means good death (1). Euthanasia has been known for a long time, in world war two the German soldiers who got very serious injuries and mostly would not recover let die(2). Locally, the Republic of Ireland criminalized this action. While in some other countries, as, the United States have three states that legalized euthanasia are Oregon, Washington and Montana states.

Read More
1749 Words | 7 Pages

Imagine having to endure so much pain and suffering for a majority of your life that you would just want it all to end. Well, there is a way one can stop their own pain and suffering and it is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The act may only be done solely to those diagnosed with terminal illnesses such as cancer, aids, and heart disease. Many people agree with the idea of euthanasia as it can help those who are suffering be stripped of all the pain they are enduring.

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia is a debatable topic that has recently gained a lot of attention. It is also referred to as physician assisted suicide. Euthanasia was first created and used for terminally ill patients or patients who live with very painful diseases. It is an option that some terminally-ill patients have considered and in my opinion, an option that every terminally-ill patient should have available to them. Euthanasia enables individuals to make a tough decision, but a decision that should be up to an individual to make; whether a terminally ill individual wants to die should be their decision without an outsider’s input.

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

From an economic standpoint, euthanasia is a brilliant alternative. Though many see it as unethical, it may be relieving for the victims to know that once they’ve passed they’re no longer considered burdens to their families. Though harsh, keeping a terminally ill person alive for a year costs no less than $55,000, dying in a dignified way is their last resort when they know their condition is not going to improve. Many patients with incurable diseases have stated that the lengthy and expensive time and operations granted by their families are not worth the few extra months they get of spending time on Earth.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

One disadvantage to this is a lot of doctors feel that euthanasia breaks the Hippocratic Oath the physicians are sworn to obey when they graduate from medical school. Euthanasia, when used for the correct reasons, can be a powerful resource for patients who cannot live with their pain. Smith (2006) states: You see, real people--that is patients--don 't blithely dismiss the Hippocratic Oath as if it were merely akin to a secret handshake. In their commonsense understanding, the Oath protects their welfare by making doctors honor-bound to always 'do no harm ' (a catchphrase that succinctly summarizes the moral thrust of the Oath, although it does not appear in the document itself).

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual

Read More
1443 Words | 6 Pages

The most common location for the euthanasia act is in Netherlands but also in some other locations around the world. In the Netherlands euthanasia is also allowed without a parents or guardians consent. My argument is that I am pro euthanasia just because when you put yourself in a person shoes you would understand what they been through and the suffering pain they endure every day after the cause of illness. My opinion on this topic is that if I was in this predicament I would want to be able to choose whether or not I would like to choose a quick and painless death than suffering from pain and suffering on a daily basis.    The cost for the medication or what the lethal dosing item is less than 100 dollars but the cost of a assisted suicide can cost up to 100,000 dollars just to insure proper care of the patient to help the family in grief.

Read More

More about Norman Cousins Arguments Against Euthanasia

Related Topics

Open Document