The world is in need of fossil fuels. Without them, we would not have cars, airplanes, and not to mention enough energy. A lot of energy is produced from them. They are a very big support. Unfortunately, they are running out. Over the past 200 years, we have consumed an unbelievable amount of them. Not only that, but they have cause never ending environmental problems like climate change. Finally when they will be gone, they will be gone forever. Thus, we need to find a new method before they are gone. The world is a mysterious place where we can find anything in it, but the most important thing to remember is not everything is perfect. Today, the most germane method found in replacement of fossil fuels is nuclear power plants. They are an …show more content…
Stating the obvious that one of the main necessities for achieving human progress is a sufficient source of energy. I am going to be taking France as an example, a country in Western Europe that plays a significant role in production of energy. It is important to state both the advantages as well as the disadvantages to make the right decision of whether countries in western Europe, specifying France should increase the production of energy or not in nuclear power stations. To start with, France gets about three quarters of electricity from nuclear power. It is also known that France originates 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy. Being above what is average. Secondly, it is the world’s largest net exporter of electricity because of the extremely low price of generation and gains 3 million a year due to this. Which is a very big advantage. In addition, In the form of fission, nuclear energy is the primary source of energy in France. It has 58 nuclear reactors (3) giving a total capacity of 63.2 Gwe, providing 416 billion kWh. France today owns a significant level of energy independence and nearly lowest cost electricity in europe. Adding to a very low level of C02 emissions per capita from electricity generation because about 90% of its electricity is nuclear or hydro. C02 emissions are …show more content…
They are having second thoughts. In addition, the costly price of nuclear power plants and nuclear inflexibilty, meaning it has slow start up and shutdown hours. Finally, as I mentioned before, nuclear waste, a very hazardous