ipl-logo

Nuclear Energy Persuasive Essay

1117 Words5 Pages

The world is in need of fossil fuels. Without them, we would not have cars, airplanes, and not to mention enough energy. A lot of energy is produced from them. They are a very big support. Unfortunately, they are running out. Over the past 200 years, we have consumed an unbelievable amount of them. Not only that, but they have cause never ending environmental problems like climate change. Finally when they will be gone, they will be gone forever. Thus, we need to find a new method before they are gone. The world is a mysterious place where we can find anything in it, but the most important thing to remember is not everything is perfect. Today, the most germane method found in replacement of fossil fuels is nuclear power plants. They are an …show more content…

Stating the obvious that one of the main necessities for achieving human progress is a sufficient source of energy. I am going to be taking France as an example, a country in Western Europe that plays a significant role in production of energy. It is important to state both the advantages as well as the disadvantages to make the right decision of whether countries in western Europe, specifying France should increase the production of energy or not in nuclear power stations. To start with, France gets about three quarters of electricity from nuclear power. It is also known that France originates 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy. Being above what is average. Secondly, it is the world’s largest net exporter of electricity because of the extremely low price of generation and gains 3 million a year due to this. Which is a very big advantage. In addition, In the form of fission, nuclear energy is the primary source of energy in France. It has 58 nuclear reactors (3) giving a total capacity of 63.2 Gwe, providing 416 billion kWh. France today owns a significant level of energy independence and nearly lowest cost electricity in europe. Adding to a very low level of C02 emissions per capita from electricity generation because about 90% of its electricity is nuclear or hydro. C02 emissions are …show more content…

They are having second thoughts. In addition, the costly price of nuclear power plants and nuclear inflexibilty, meaning it has slow start up and shutdown hours. Finally, as I mentioned before, nuclear waste, a very hazardous

Show More
Related
836 Words | 4 Pages

As this forms we now have a fuel source that we can collect and use. What

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

However, the cons of nuclear energy are numerous. For example, not only are there high risks of potential meltdowns, but the nuclear waste that is is created is extremely toxic. Also, the energy source of nuclear energy is Uranium, which is a scarce resource, and its supply is estimated to last only for the next 30 to 60 years. Why are people choosing to build numerous nuclear power plants all over the world when we will eventually get stuck with them and their radioactive waste in a short period of time? The film The China Syndrome is fair to the nuclear industry because it explains the potenial dangers of a nuclear power plant realistically to the

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

They also don't have renewable energy, meaning it will eventually be consumed. Although nuclear power plants don't release as much carbon dioxide as coal power plants mining the uranium still releases a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Nuclear power plants can help the environment drastically but they also come with a drastic price, they won't last forever

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear energy doesn’t mean putting power into a crazy man’s bomb. Nuclear energy means powering millions of people’s homes. Currently, nuclear energy powers twenty percent of U.S. electricity. The power plants of American generate 797.1 billion kilowatts per hour. There are thirty states within the U.S. that have operating nuclear reactors.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

Nuclear power plants provide cheap, clean, and efficient energy and new technology might soon overcome the current drawbacks. Disasters like the ones at Chernobyl and Fukushima have long given nuclear energy an ill-deserved reputation. It produces no greenhouse gases and only trace amounts of radiation at a comparable price to coal power. However, the large initial cost and the potential for meltdowns has prevented nuclear energy from growing to supply a significant portion of the world’s electricity. Safety features on current nuclear reactors make a nuclear disaster highly unlikely, but technological advances could soon negate those risks completely.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear power plants have many flaws and risks, and analysing the Fukushima incident this can be noted. An earthquake caused the boiling water reactors to lose off-site electrical power, and the subsequent tsunami formed an inundation which produced an general black out, losing all control systems, safety mechanisms, etc. the first thing that happened is that they took on account the seismicity of the place, not the probability for tsunamis. With no energy they didn´t t have the energy to cool the excess heat. They tried pumping water, but there wasn´t any emergency procedure for the event.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

In this day and age we seem to come across one big question where is are next source of power going to come from and for lots of countries out there seem to becoming very dependent on nuclear reactors as a main power source maybe this is because of the high energy output it has or maybe it's because of the high high availability of uranium and plutonium that is needed as the main fuel source for the reactor or it could be a combination of both of these factors. Even though the use of these nuclear reactors as a main source of energy has its benefits, the dangers these nuclear reactors pose are still very great. Accident do occur at these power plants some are small and not so bad and others can be catastrophic and accidents are not the only

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

High Stakes Since the Industrial Revolution, the use of fossil fuels has increased so quickly that the supply will no longer meet the demand. Due to this dilemma, scientists have been able to discover new ways to obtain energy through methods such as geothermal, hydroelectricity, solar, wind, and nuclear. Of the above, the most controversial method is nuclear power. Despite its promising ability to produce large amounts of energy, it places our lives, wallets, and environment at stake.

Read More
1727 Words | 7 Pages

But coal is in a unique position, as there is a growing backlash against the use of it to a degree never before seen. In a comparative check, all fossil fuels have a higher rate of mortality (individual and cumulative basis) than renewable resources. Out of the renewable resources, nuclear energy currently holds the lowest mortality and pollution rate of all. Granted, nuclear energy is used far less globally. But in the countries that nuclear energy is increasingly becoming the primary energy source, the have been zero notable fluctuations in mortality, pollution, and cost attributable to nuclear energy.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Our society is in constant need of energy. 40 percent of the United States energy consumption is from oil. Coal provides 23 percent and natural gas provides 22 percent of our energy. These sources and how much we get from them will soon have to change because as most of us know, our fossil fuels are limited. Once these fossil fuels are used, they cannot be replaced.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear energy has long been proposed as a viable alternative to fossil fuels for energy worldwide since the first commercial nuclear power stations began operation in the United States during the 1950s. At present, there are over 435 commercial nuclear power plants operating in 31 countries worldwide, generating 11 percent of the world’s power. Nuclear plants are able to generate large amounts of energy through the splitting of atomic nuclei in a process known as nuclear fission. The amount of energy released by nuclear fission is measured in units of electron volts, eV, and typical figures can range up to 200 million electron volts. Compared to the combustion of fossil fuels, which release only a few electron volts per reaction, nuclear power dominates in terms of power

Read More
1220 Words | 5 Pages

France obtains about 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy, because of a long-standing policy based on energy security. France's electricity generation is based on nuclear, which considers for 75% of its power. Renewable energies make up about a quarter of electricity amount, the majority of which comes from hydro. Nations such as Lithuania, France, and Slovakia get almost all of their electricity from nuclear power plants.

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy is one of the several alternative energy sources that have been introduced ever since. Nuclear energy’s various advantages entice many countries to start practicing it. One must consider the amount of energy generated by nuclear fuels, as they are highly-concentrated energy sources. Small uranium pellets, which are the most common form of fuel in generating nuclear energy, can generate as much electricity as a trainload full of coal does. In addition, nuclear power plants do not produce green house gases as byproducts.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

It makes pollution in the water which it releases back into the environment. Fossil fuels cause acid rain and global warming by putting carbon dioxide. It makes other alternatives look like the are the worst thing ever. Thorium, It is possible to fuel nuclear power plants with other fuel types than uranium. Thorium, which also is a greener alternative, has lately been given an increased amount of attention.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

They are able to meet the needs of large industrialized cities as well as the suburban towns, as the energy is quick to create, meaning that they are able to make large amounts of energy if it is required due to an emergency ("Nuclear Fission Advantages and Disadvantages"). Small amounts of U-235 can produce large amounts of energy while burning of fossil fuels produces much less energy with a much larger amount ("Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear"). Nuclear fission has been proved to be the most powerful and efficient source than any other alternative energy sources, due to the advancement in technologies, it has made it a more viable option than others. It is due to this, why many countries are putting huge investments in nuclear power ("Nuclear Energy"). It also makes the electricity cheap as the cost of uranium, is quite low and also the average life of a nuclear reactor ranges from 40-60years, so it is great investment it can last a really long time.

Read More

More about Nuclear Energy Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document