ipl-logo

Nuclear Fission Essay

1472 Words6 Pages

The problem is that the world is a very massive place, where we need a lot of energy to fulfil the basic needs of our lives. Through the years we have been presented with several different alternative energy source options, as the energy sources like fossil fuels works against the environment. Nuclear fission is one of the alternative energy sources which is considered to be the future energy source of the world, but just like any other things nuclear fission has several disadvantages and advantages, but it is our responsibility as a society to weigh those implications and come up with a solution which supports the world for the better. Nuclear fission is one of the things which still remains to have an uncertain future which is due to two …show more content…

They are able to meet the needs of large industrialized cities as well as the suburban towns, as the energy is quick to create, meaning that they are able to make large amounts of energy if it is required due to an emergency ("Nuclear Fission Advantages and Disadvantages"). Small amounts of U-235 can produce large amounts of energy while burning of fossil fuels produces much less energy with a much larger amount ("Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear"). Nuclear fission has been proved to be the most powerful and efficient source than any other alternative energy sources, due to the advancement in technologies, it has made it a more viable option than others. It is due to this, why many countries are putting huge investments in nuclear power ("Nuclear Energy"). It also makes the electricity cheap as the cost of uranium, is quite low and also the average life of a nuclear reactor ranges from 40-60years, so it is great investment it can last a really long time. The main reason behind the costs of the fuel being low is because a small amount of the fuel can create massive amounts of energy, it releases million times more energy as compared to traditional sources of energy ("Nuclear …show more content…

Even though the application of the energy source as a alternative is a affordable, establishing a plant for it would require a high initial cost and would also take up to 5-10 years, along with this, the safety measures that need to be utilized inside the plants would be very expensive ("Disadvantages of Nuclear"). To build the complex technologies that are needed and the extreme safety measures that must be built, would require a staggering amount of money, for it to be built and also for the factories to run effectively. If the safety measures aren’t taken strictly then just accidents like the two major nuclear catastrophes at Chernobyl and Fukushima will repeat itself ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). As nuclear reactors cannot explode like nuclear bombs, as that would require a mix of 90% highly reactive fuel vs about 4-5% of highly reactive furl for nuclear power, which can melt down if the safety measures are not properly carried out, with some highly disastrous consequences ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). The radiation from Chernobyl incident extended as far a Sweden and Italy resulting in thousands of cancer cases to arise in those areas. Another disastrous incident happened in Fukushima Daiichi, which leaked into the Pacific Ocean, where it dispersed widely. Radioactive tuna was detected off the US Pacific coast in 2014,

Show More
Related
354 Words | 2 Pages

When the nuclei of Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239 undergo nuclear fission, they produce waste as a by-product, which is known as nuclear waste or “fission fragments”. (Leslie Corrice, 2015) This waste contains radioisotopes, which are radioactive isotopes that have long half-lives. This means that the radioisotopes are able to stay in the atmosphere for hundreds of thousands of years, which is extremely hazardous to the earth’s environment. Very commonly this waste contaminates water and ruins the quality of both air and soil, which in turn devastates the planet.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Power plants burn fuel to produce heat to generate energy; however, nuclear power plants use the heat given off fission to turn water into steam. Nuclear energy is without a doubt a great way to power our homes because, Nuclear power plants are safer than other energy alternatives. Nuclear plants are safer than other energy alternatives. Coal is responsible for five times more deaths than nuclear power plants, coal also causes over one thousands more serious causes of illness than nuclear. Nuclear plants produce steam while coal plants, heat water by burning coal that produces greenhouse emissions.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Nuclear energy only creates minimal negative effects to the environment. Nuclear energy produces steam and low levels of carbon dioxide. Nuclear energy is also beneficial seeing that it produces a large amount of energy for a low cost. Nuclear reactors generate energy at a lower cost than oil, gas or coal. This nuclear energy will be a stable source of energy seeing that it is a base load source and it is synergistic with other renewable resources.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

Facts, data, expert opinion: a) Low Pollution such as air pollution, water pollution - Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide b) Low Operating Costs - The cost of the uranium, which is utilized as a fuel in this process, is low. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. The normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

In this day and age where energy is one of the greatest factors in world events, it is unsurprising to see nuclear energy, the bridge between fossil fuels and renewable resources, argued for and against so fiercely. Yet under this umbrella term of “nuclear energy” that people enjoy throwing around, there are two wildly different forms of energy. Things that perhaps shouldn’t be lumped together so haphazardly. Those are Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion.

Read More
1790 Words | 8 Pages

Nuclear energy has numerous world benefits that other forms of energy creation just don’t, and its pros are truly unprecedented by any other source of energy. Nuclear power plants are inexpensive to run, which means they can easily be maintained and sustained at a low cost. And while the reactors themselves may be expensive, with government grants the materials can be much more easily purchased and built. The most expensive part of the nuclear reactor process is the uranium, which again, isn’t hard to get as it’s used in few other applications and can be acquired through government programs. Additionally, the energy emitted from these power plants compared to their cost is immense and an extremely worthwhile investment for governments and private businesses.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

Fission is used in nuclear power plants and produce a great amount of energy for us. To produce any type of these reactions, different conditions must be met and different amount of energy is

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

“Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy.” Michael Burgess Prior to the introduction of nuclear energy, fossil fuel was thought to be the only available source in producing energy. Although fossil fuel, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, contains high energy value, it produces too many harmful byproducts that ultimately pollute our environment. With the rising concerns over global warming as more and more greenhouse gases accumulate in our Earth’s atmosphere, many voice such opinions that new alternative, yet sustainable method must be adopted to produce energy.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

All of these costs eventually add up. Building the nuclear power plant itself if extremely costly. It costs an estimated 6 to 9 billion dollars for each power plant, far more expensive then the industry had first expected. However, obtaining the energy itself is actually cheap. It costs only 2 cents per kilowatt per hour.

Read More
1466 Words | 6 Pages

Probably words like radiation, mutations and Homer Simpson pop into your head. However, that is not the case. According to Mark A. Jones, Director of Nuclear Operations and Engineering at Hutchinson Island Nuclear Power Plant, during our interview stated: “Nuclear energy compared to solar energy brings less of an impact because nuclear energy doesn 't emit air pollution unlike other forms of energy. It also only needs the fraction of land the salon energy needs and self-contain its own waste from polluting the environment.”

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The potential is limitless, and it should be realized as they have low greenhouse gas emissions, are efficient, powerful, cheap and reliable. Positives outweigh the negatives, and we should keep on using nuclear energy. Firstly, nuclear power generation has low greenhouse gas emissions, which make it good for the environment. The actual fission

Read More
1917 Words | 8 Pages

Indeed there exist many pros and cons of using nuclear technology where both sides of the spectrum hold arguments which are understandable. It is alright to use nuclear energy, yet without a doubt, we have to be cautious when using it. Failure to do so may lead to the very destruction of ourselves from the something which could ironically, save us in the face of global warming. Hence, despite the risks of accidents, the advocation of the use of nuclear energy remains justified given that these risks and damage can be minimized through apt

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization. Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats.

Read More

More about Nuclear Fission Essay

Related Topics

Open Document