In the article “Dirty oil is turning Canada into a corrupt Petro State” written by the Canadian, Journalist, well-awarded author Andrew Nikiforuk, argues that bitumen, steam plants, and tar sands are changing Canada from a country that cared; to a country that does not stand for much. Throughout this rhetorical analysis, I will use the three appeals to prove these points.
The author Andrew Nikiforuk uses the appeal of Ethos to help get his message across to his readers. The appeals of ethos proves that the author has credibility and authority. Andrew has written about the energy in Canada and written for many famous magazines and newspapers, and specifically, in the article, he uses his extensive knowledge on the subject to, go into great
…show more content…
The first main section of the article writes how the mining of bitumen has destroyed 1.4 million hectares of forest. These operations have begun to create environmental messes, known as tailing ponds (Pg. 189). The article goes on to say that the steam plants used to melt down Bitumen are destroying the forest to install pipelines and wells. The amount of energy used to create Bitumen “Is so high that one joule of energy makes 1.4 joules of Bitumen (Pg. 189), which has resulted in the gain of barely any energy. The people who work on the tar sands are mostly temporary workers, and Canada employees 250,000 of them. The Canadian authorities “view temporary workers as stocks that can be bought in or out as required” Lastly the article talks about politicians and the economics view on Bitumen. The Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper believes that the oil sands have helped the Albertan Economy and has produced jobs that give people work. But the political party of the Conservatives has no plan if the Albertan Economy fails and has no sovereign land or no wealth saved. Canada is becoming a state that is controlled by oil and that needs to change. The logical flow of ideas throughout the essay allows the reader to understand the main messages of the