The O.J Simpson trial was one of the most identifiable cases in American history. The real question of the case is if O.J. Simpson actually committed the double murder. In my opinion, I believe O.J. Simpson is guilty, but in reality there is not enough evidence to prove that he was the one who killed his ex-wife and her friend. According to the New York Times, they believed that there was proof that O.J. Simpson was the killer, but majority of the jurors believed that he was innocent. Did they find him innocent because he was a famous NFL player, or because he did not kill them? For the evidence, they say that the police tampered with the proof by “placing blood evidence swatches inside plastic, instead of paper containers, where their DNA could degrade; collecting some blood evidence weeks after the crimes had been committed; walking around for hours with a vial of blood evidence instead of delivering it immediately to a laboratory for preservation, packaging and storing, and spilling Mr. Simpson's blood in the very laboratory where, shortly after, other samples would be tested” (Kolata, 1995). Also, the medical examiner was not called to the crime of the …show more content…
He testified that he heard two men arguing and then saw a white van (similar to a Ford Bronco, the one like O.J’s) rapidly leaving the murder scene. Another witness is Jill Shively who says that she saw OJ driving his Bronco from the Bundy murder scene around the time of the slayings. Kato Kaelin, who was a house guest in Nicole’s condo saw O.J the night of the murders at 9:37 pm wearing a blue cotton suit, where the fibers from the same suit was found on the shirt of Ronald Goldman. By 10:50 p.m Kato heard someone walking outside by his window where a bloody glove was found. Before Nicole was murdered, she told a few people that she had a feeling that O.J would kill her. Even Nicole’s older sister Denise Brown thought that O.J was the