ipl-logo

Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

469 Words2 Pages

Olaf Dietrich, a German born migrant with a history of prior offences as his alias “Hugo rich” found himself face to face with the law after being found guilty for a range of drug related offences. The offender both naive and ignorant to the processes of the law took it upon himself to represent his case alone, a decision he did not expect to be incriminating in the outcome of his final verdict. Olaf Dietrich believed, although much to the dismay of any potential representatives, that he had a high chance in succeeding in his case and refused to plead guilty or believe otherwise. After exhausting all attempts he made to seek legal representation and being forced to then proceed with his trial as a lone representative, it wasn’t until he had …show more content…

Dietrich also believed that it was in the discretion of a judge to delay or adjourn a trail for any accused without representation until appropriate representation was found and the trial could advance fairly and justly The issue began the day Dietrich landed on Melbourne soil on the 17th of December 1986 after having travelled to Thailand. At the time of his arrival Dietrich was retrieved and arrested by federal police/officials for having imported a minimum of 70 grams of heroin that he had hidden in a number of digested condoms. Dietrich was then tried for three counts in the Victorian county court one being for importing a trafficable quantity of drugs into Australia. Throughout the 40 day trial procedure Dietrich was forced to represent himself given he had already exhausted all possibilities of retaining any form of legal representation. After having applied countlessly, failing then reapplying for assistance from the supreme court of Victoria his request was once again denied and was obligated to continue the process

Show More
Related
1235 Words | 5 Pages

Crime Description This paper will analyze the murder of Vanessa Pham by Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia. Around 3:30 in the afternoon on June 27, 2010, as Vanessa Pham was leaving a nail salon in Fairfax Plaza Shopping Center when Julio Blanco-Garcia approached her. Blanco-Garcia, high on PCP and carrying his infant daughter, told Pham that he was having a medical emergency and asked her to drive him to the hospital. Vanessa agreed and allowed the two into her car.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

He had murdered a security guard in cold blood. This resulted in Olaf Dietrich receiving the life sentence. This decisions biggest affect was the way the Australian government deals with providing legal aid to any individual who may not have access to legal aid, to people may not be affluent enough or to those who have committed such serious crimes to which legal aid isn’t supplied. The decision also affects the way legal aid works itself and how it works in the Australian legal system.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Tara Brown’s murder, various groups of individuals are affected. As well as maintaining principles of fair punishment and deterrence, the criminal justice system has to consider perceptions of the victim’s family (secondary victim), the community’s demand for crime prevention, and the offender’s rights to a fair court hearing. The most likely outcome is imprisonment for Lionel John Patea due to committing an indictable offence. It is important to note that if this was only a case of domestic abuse without murder, it would utilise more time, effort and expenses to come to a resolution. This is due to the different circumstances and degree of abuse that the judge has to assess.

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

On April 18, 1977, Leonard Peltier was found guilty of two accounts of first degree murder. He was sentenced to serve two consecutive terms of life imprisonment for the murders of two FBI agents. Despite the jury’s unanimous verdict, many individuals believe that Peltier is a victim of social injustice. The evidence used against Peltier is in many cases circumstantial and does not provide solid evidence to convict him. Whether or not he was responsible for the deaths of the two FBI agents, his case deserves to be viewed from other perspectives in addition to personal bias.

Read More
1411 Words | 6 Pages

Adnan handled his trial in a respectable and mature manner, however, the same can not be said about those around him. If only all aspects of the court had been respected, and Jay’s testimony not accepted, Adnan may have been walking free today. Instead, he remains locked away as a result of the faulty trial he

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More
1340 Words | 6 Pages

“On July 30, 1992, an innocent person was convicted of a heinous crime”. Guy Paul Morin, an ordinary man, was arrested, imprisoned and convicted of first degree murder. The victim was Christine Jessop, a nine-year-old girl from Ontario, Canada. She was found murdered in a field about fifty kilometres from where she lived. Due to the investigation team’s carelessness and tunnel vision, the systematic failure of the justice system, and the poor handling of evidence by the crown there was not only one, but two victims in this case.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

But somehow, when I present this same basic belief in the context of a secular humanist thrust into the brutal world of criminal justice, it loses its coherence. (Feige 238) Feige cites the criminal justice environment as “brutal,” which has been demonstrated time and time again in the book. He sums up his argument by reminding his audience that there exists no relative glamour in being a public defender: “We public defenders are a strange breed: passionate people spending ourselves in a Sisyphean struggle for justice in a system rigged to crush us” (Feige 268). Exceptionally thankful, then, should all people be for public defenders who spend day in and day out consistently doomed to fail.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Dr Haneef’s detainment without charge was in direct violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) article 10 and 11. Article 10 and 11 state respectively that “Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him” and “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence” . Because Dr Haneef was not given a fair trial upon his criminal charge, nor was he presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, this illuminates the erosion of an individual’s right to civil liberties. These two conditions are regarded as an international human right under the United Nation’s UDHR, yet, Australia’s laws are depicted to be disregarding an individual’s civil liberties in exchange for community

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Although Canada is universally known as safe haven for refugees, hundreds of unwanted immigrants across the country are held captive under maximum security. Despite the circumstances of these immigrants and refugees, I believe that keeping an innocent man locked behind bars in maximum security is unfair and hostile. Using Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance, I will be analyzing Ebrahim Toure’s conviction. I will also be applying the Potter Box Model of Reasoning by explaining every detail of his case and exploring the values, the principles and the loyalties that lies within this wrongful conviction to conclude with moral standpoint for Ebrahim Toure.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

“ I won’t write a word because I am innocent. ”(Ha 472) Mr. Chiu still believes that his plead of innocence will help him win his freedom. He does not realize that he is not in a place of influence or power to sway their decision. His complaints have no impact on those in charge of him.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

We must go and overthrow the court, he says!’” (Miller 119). Miller gives insight into how the accusations around 1950-1954 may have also included the pressure of higher authority forcing someone (of the lower authority) with power, money, and etc. to testify false accusations. The author presents an interesting story that mirrors and represents a different time period, displaying the social injustice of people as they are motivated by fear, jealousy, hatred of one another, and more.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

Victims are not given a formal or active role in all criminal trials. Testimonies from victims are subject to examination. This does not provide an adequate process for transitional

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

In this essay I will argue that the right to private and family life in case of overstayers facing removal should be restricted. However the restriction to private and family life right of foreign criminals facing deportation could be problematic, given their immigration status prior to the committed crime and the strength of their establishments in the United Kingdom. I will argue that a blanket restriction to private and family life right of foreign criminals facing deportation will be unjust and could raise the question of proportionality, whilst we evaluate the type and circumstances of the crime committed to the restriction of the rights envisaged. I will also address the situation where the Home Secretary delay in decision takings could raise a positive expectation and could make it unconscionable to restrict those rights of overstayers or foreign criminals.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

More about Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

Open Document