• The approach to the determination of the value of the individual proposed by Oliver Wendell Holmes was based on a philosophical concept of individual worth. Holmes believed that each person had their own intrinsic value and that it was important to understand and consider the individual circumstances in each case in order to fully appreciate their value. He argued that each person should be treated as an individual, regardless of their social class or status, and that the value of a person should never be judged by the prevailing standards of the day. His approach was based on the idea that each person had a unique value and that it was important to recognize this value in order to ensure that justice was done.
• Meanwhile, Dr. Liebbrandt's approach to the value of the individual was more focused on legal implications. As an applied expert at the Nuremberg Medical Trial, he was tasked with evaluating the individual cases of those accused of war crimes in order to determine the appropriate punishment. He sought to determine the culpability of the accused and to assess the evidence presented in order to determine the
…show more content…
Firstly, the challenge posed by Oliver Wendell Holmes' approach to individual value is the difficulty of determining what constitutes an individual's value in a philosophical sense 1. Because there is no single definition of value, it is difficult to assess the individual circumstances of each case in order to make an informed decision. Secondly, the challenge posed by Dr. Liebbrandt's approach is determining the appropriate punishment for those accused of war crimes. This requires a thorough evaluation of the individual circumstances of the case and an understanding of the legal and moral implications of the decision. In both cases, it is essential for researchers to be aware of the complexities of the situation in order to ensure that justice is