ipl-logo

Olivier And Branagh: Film Analysis

1093 Words5 Pages

Throughout the generations, various film productions have made for Shakespeare’s great works, and in fact, the adaptations of the Shakespeare films are popular among publicists in advertising for the reason of the broadest attractions and influences (Jackson, 2007: 7). Among his greatest cinematic adaptations, numerous productions were also made for Henry V; among them, Laurence Olivier (1944) and Kenneth Branagh (1989) have always made headlines when it comes to the discussion of its excellence and influence. It could have been attention-grabbing for the contemporary people to see the combination of the greatest artists creating an all-time spotlighted movie, when both movies were released to the public. However, what makes them more astonishing …show more content…

Olivier’s version of the film is more focused on the patriotic tone, considering the fact that it was made in the height of the World War II. Such tendency leads to the illustration of idealized king, as the Olivier film plays a role of a heroic spectacle and a celebration of monarchy, reminding of Britain 's position in Europe (Canby, 1989). On the contrary, Branagh puts emphasize on satirical tone where the king is depicted as a more humane character (Buchanan, 2005: 197). At the same time, Branagh successfully humanizes Henry V by reviving the scenes from the original text that Olivier omits in his version as a reaction to Olivier’s. According to Canby (1989), “Olivier 's Henry V is a splendid film that is also splendid propaganda.” This quote demonstrates one of the central influences on the film that significant changes have made to express the propaganda morals of the war period (Aitken, 1991: p.262). In fact, the stark difference between the two cinematic adaptations is the battle of the Argincourt. In Olivier’s film, all the focuses are on how powerful and inspiring Henry V can be described in the battlefield, whereas Branagh emphasizes the realistic view of bloody battle in a dark and gloomy background (Jackson, 2007: …show more content…

Branagh’s version of Henry V may have taken a major step toward through screening more skeptical response about war compared to Olivier’s version. However, some limitations can be identified through pluralistic viewpoints he takes regarding the issue of war and power mechanism; specifically, the interpretation of Henry V as a heroic leader, though he regards the innocent sacrifices of war as a necessary evil, indicates the irony of Branagh whose original intention is to create realism theater (Jackson, 2007: 241). Also, in Olivier’s intriguing screen spectacle, he shows a tendency to excessively rely on the comic characters in the play, which can be seen narrow-minded in terms of understanding the characters (Crowther, 1946). Thus, in bringing Shakespeare’s plays to modern film audiences, it can be evaluated that the two versions have achieved both artistic and commercial successes, greatly influencing the contemporary society and

Show More
Related
541 Words | 3 Pages

Henry appeals to his viewers emotional appeal by conecting and allowing his viewers to understand that no matter what they do, they will fail, and the last resort will be war either way. Although Henry used pathos to appeal to their emotional side, he appeals to their logical side by using

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

In order to make the audience realize the reality of the situation, Henry asks “Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received?” (1) He inserts the adjective, “insidious” to describe the Britains who are “deceiving” the audience in that their continuous effort to make peace with Britain is coming to an end. Henry continues to ask, “ are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation?” Here he points out that the British has pretty much forced them into submission because they are already out to attack. His repetition of rhetorical questions challenges the audience in a way that it gives them no other option but to fight.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

Through the use of diction, Henry appeals to the senses by making logical connections for the audience and by appealing to the audiences credibility. By doing this he the audience receives his message better because Henry captivates their attention. Henry utilizes figurative language in order to instill a sense of urgency in the audience. He wants the audience to also believe that a war with Great Britain is necessary. Henry connects the audience with their religion through rhetorical devices, such as allusions.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

For example, Henry highlights the cowardice of the colonists when he emphasizes that they must “fulfill the great responsibility which we [colonists] hold to god and our country” (Henry 83). Henry appeals to his audience by assessing their religious values, then patriotism. By constructing this statement declaratively, the audience senses Henry’s passion and frustration with the lack of resistance that the colonists have shown to Britain's corrupt ways. Therefore, the audience believes it is a necessity to not only listen but to agree with a statement so direct.

Read More
1514 Words | 7 Pages

Society cannot listen to recordings of Henry’s speech from when Henry First spoke it. Instead, modern audiences have to interpret his character through his words. Henry’s character is one faced with an ultimatum; “Give me liberty or give me death” is his final cry which is remembered throughout history. It is this final line which shows the audience that Henry’s character is at a crossroads in their life, will they fight for the liberty and truth they so desired or stay in “submission and slavery”. The character resounded with the audience at the Virginia Convention and still resounds with many people around the world today.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

During the exposition where Henry and his battalion are camped and preparing for the enemy to present themselves, Henry reveals his ambitions and expectations of war. Henry illustrates his clear incapacity to combat the mental strain war inflicts on its victims through his romanticization of his ‘imagined’ outcome. Henry’s mother’s statement of disapproval and insecurity reinforces his immaturity and vanity as his primary goal for joining in the war is recognition of

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

This shows that Henry is patriotic, yet still his own character. Henry is trying to grant the audience a diverse viewpoint, rather than discrediting their

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Known for producing one of the most renowned and successful depictions of Hamlet, director Kenneth Branagh has transformed the world of Shakespearean films. Within his film, Branagh placed a fair amount of

Read More
843 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s Henry V, the character of King Henry delivers some powerful verbiage, known as St. Crispin’s Day Speech, to his troops in order to rally the men for battle. In this speech, King Henry chooses to invoke themes such as glory, religion, and comradery to make the battle they are about to fight immortal in the soldiers’ minds and to motivate them to fight together. These themes draw similar emotions in all men, no matter their background; all men have the need for honour, the urge to please the deity they believe in, and the need to trust in their fellow men. Every man wants his story to be remembered.

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

“For never was a story of more woe than this of Juliet and her Romeo.”, is a line that was very important to the history of literature. It tells of the inevitable fate of two star-crossed lovers that were bound to death because of each other. There have been many movies and plays preformed with this story line, but two in particular are the Baz Luhrmann film and the original play’s text. Both the Baz Luhrmann film and William Shakespeare’s play of Romeo and Juliet may be compared by focusing on the following scenes: the party scene, balcony scene, fight and death scene of Tybalt and Mercutio, and the suicide scene.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.

Read More
1574 Words | 7 Pages

MIP Rough Draft The play “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare and the book, “The Handmaids Tale” by Margaret Atwood, both create a fall of power in society and this loss of leadership opens the door for corruption to take over. Both authors have created this instability in society and use the motifs: loss of power, religion, and relationships to explore characters’ innermost selves. This exploration of characters proves that one will submit to anything in order to obtain stability in a corrupt environment. Both Shakespeare and Margaret Atwood immediately pull the rug out beneath from the characters in their work, creating instability not only in the character’s mind but in the reader’s mind as well.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

His choice of language is effective at evoking emotion. Through rhetorical questions, Henry was able to emphasize his points, and grab the audience’s attention, creating an emotional effect on the listeners. “Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?” These statements prove the speaker’s argument and stir the audience’s emotions.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare was a famous author and poet that wrote extremely well-known texts, such as “Romeo and Juliet” and “Hamlet.” Shakespeare lived during the Renaissance when art and science advanced and he was one of the major contributors to this historical period. “Shakespeare Influences the way we speak now” by Hephzibah Anderson, “William Shakespeare’s Impact on Theatre” by Octane, and “How Outrage Built Over a Shakespearean Depiction of Trump” by Sara Krulwich suggest that Shakespeare had a great influence on many aspects of society, such as the phrases we use, style of theater, and is a figure of inspiration to many people. Shakespeare has contributed to many well-known phrases that are still used to this day, showing his significance in history.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

In the twenty-first century, the plays of William Shakespeare may at first appear dated and irrelevant: they use archaic language, are set in the age of Kings and Queens, and the Kingdom of England. However, it would be plainly mistaken to construe that Shakespeare’s works do not still remain integral to a twenty-first century society. Shakespeare’s plays gave the words and expressions one uses every day, revolutionized the art of theater as it was known, and forewarned about issues that would unknowingly still apply centuries later. Therefore, Shakespeare has had a profound effect on our lives by enriching our language and culture, as well as providing ideas that would still apply five centuries later, and it would thus behoove us to learn from his works and life.

Read More

More about Olivier And Branagh: Film Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document